backtop


Print 44 comment(s) - last by Lerianis.. on Mar 3 at 4:17 PM


Anthony Stancl   (Source: AP)
Stancl's sentence was part of a plea deal

One of the most common things for internet users to access are social networking sites. Facebook is the largest social networking site online right now followed by MySpace. Both social networks have had their share of serious trouble caused by users of the networks. In January 2009, a man in England was sentenced to 18 years in prison for killing his wife after she changed her Facebook status to single after a bitter divorce.

MySpace has had problems with sexual offenders frequenting the site as well and kicked 90,000 sex offenders off its site in February of 2009. One of the most disturbing cases involving sexual abuse that stemmed from a social networking site happened on Facebook and involved 18-year-old Anthony Stancl. Stancl was charged in February of 2009 with five counts of child enticement, two counts of third-degree sexual assault, possession of child pornography, repeated sexual assault of the same child, and making a bomb threat.

The charges stem from a devious scheme that Stancl -- a high school student at New Berlin Eisenhower High School in New Berlin, WI -- operated where he posed on Facebook as a female named Kayla (or in some case, Emily). Stancl lured male classmates from his school into sending him nude photos. Stancl then used the photos to blackmail some of the male students into performing sexual acts with him by threatening to release the photos to other students at the school and post them online.

When police raided Stancl's home, they recovered 300 nude images of juvenile males from his computer. According to police, the youngest victim of sex acts with Stancl was 15 and the youngest male in one of the photos was 13. The incidents started in 2007 and the last was in November of 2008. Stancl was caught when he was  linked to a bomb threat during the investigation of the incident.

Stancl was sentenced this week and faced as much as 30 years in prison and 20 years of extended supervision. Judge J. Mac Davis sentenced Stancl to 15 years in prison and another 13 years of extended supervision. Stancl will also have to register as a sex offender. 

Stancl agreed to the prison time as part of a plea agreement that stipulated he plead no contest to the charges and he was convicted on December 22, 2009 on two felony counts of repeated sexual assault of the same child, possession of child pornography, and third-degree sexual assault. Judge Davis imposed the sentence after citing a 2004 case when Stancl was a juvenile where he was found delinquent in the sexual assault of a 3-year old he was babysitting. Davis said, "I am afraid of what he can and might do."

Stancl apologized to the students and families that he victimized in court as well as his own family, including a brother and sister still attending the same high school. Stancl said, "I put you through a terrible situation."

Stancl's defense attorney was seeking five years in prison and ten years of supervision. The defense claimed that the attacks stemmed from Stancl's struggles with homosexuality and being "outed" as gay by an older boy at school. Stancl was taken to prison immediately after the sentence was imposed.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

18 years is not enough.
By Mitch101 on 2/26/2010 11:29:24 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
sexual assault of a 3-year old he was babysitting


That's a death sentence in my book of law and order and given his background laundry list why would he be free to ever walk the streets again?




RE: 18 years is not enough.
By MozeeToby on 2/26/10, Rating: -1
RE: 18 years is not enough.
By phattyboombatty on 2/26/2010 12:41:39 PM , Rating: 5
"Delinquent" is the term used in place of "guilty" when the perpetrator is a juvenile. So, he committed the wrongful act, but was given a free pass because he was a minor.


RE: 18 years is not enough.
By troysavary on 2/26/2010 11:45:31 AM , Rating: 2
That is far worse than what he did later. In the 3 years old's case, the kid could not defend him or her self. In the other case, they could have told him where to go. Given the choice between my naked pic getting passed around, or gay sex, even as a teen the choice would have been easy. Pass my pic around, if that floats your boat. Charge him with fraud for misrepresenting himself, and with the blackmail attempt, but how is it assault when the other kids submitted without force? And was he not under 18 when he committed the acts? I think it is utterly retarded when one kid gives another kid a naked pic and people call it kiddy pron.


"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki