backtop


Print 34 comment(s) - last by akse.. on Feb 9 at 12:47 PM

Verizon says website is "explicitly blocked"

Many people will agree that consumers should have unfettered access to the internet via wireless and landline connections. There have been instances where access to specific websites and specific types of traffic have been filtered or outright blocked by ISPs and wireless carriers. In July 2009, AT&T Wireless blocked access to the 4chan message boards.

The 4chan site is a message board that reportedly has as many as 200,000 messages posted each day. 

The issue with the site and wireless carriers stems from the site being used to launch different types of internet attacks ranging from mere pranks to more serious network attacks. The 4chan.org website is reporting that it is being blocked by Verizon Wireless. The site posted a statement to its front page that read, "Over the past 72 hours, we've been receiving reports from Verizon Wireless customers having difficulty accessing the image boards."

4chan went on to claim that only traffic on port 80 was being blocked leading it to believe that the site had been intentionally blocked and that some sort of problem was not causing Verizon Wireless users to not be able to access the site. A 4chan administrator going by "moot" wrote that Verizon had been contacted and a Verizon representative said, "You'll need the customer to call to request it be unblocked."

The same user "moot" reported yesterday that after contacting the Verizon Network Repair Bureau the response received was that the site had been explicitly blocked. It's hard to say whether this is a good or a bad thing. If the site is a rally point for attacks online, some might argue that cutting the site off is a good thing. However, once you start down the slope of censoring and blocking content that some deem objectionable, those that use the same site for legitimate reasons are sure to be angered.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: 4chan may be a cesspool
By namechamps on 2/8/2010 3:21:39 PM , Rating: 5
If from a business perspective they feel that the site could do more harm to their users than good, they have every right to block it.

This is exactly why we net neutrality.

If VZ felt that "scary parts" of the internet should be blocked why not offer an optional service to block content based on a bunch of different criteria.

As long as it was optional I would have a no problem with it.

Hell verizon could even charge for it. Imagine the upsell. Parent on family plan could restrict their children from seeing porn, hate sites, gambling, etc.

win-win for the consumer & VZ.

When VZ starts deciding it knows better than me what I should be " allowed " to access that is when govt needs to rip the ISP a new one.


"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki