Print 27 comment(s) - last by Exodite.. on Feb 3 at 3:54 PM

Modules using Samsung's latest 3Xnm process are expected later this year
Lower power due to smaller process

DDR3 DRAM has just overtaken DDR2 as the predominant memory technology used in today's new computers. Newer RAM has traditionally been more expensive than previous generations, but DDR3 pricing has gone down over the last few years due to mass production and die shrinks to smaller process nodes. Not only does this result in price cuts, but also lower power consumption and higher possible speeds.

Samsung just started producing DDR3 on its 40nm process last year, but is already working on its newest generational node. The company describes it as being 30nm-class, but is generally acknowledged as being around 32nm. The process size refers to the average half-pitch of a memory cell. A smaller die size means that more dies can fit on a silicon wafer, reducing production costs. The company estimates the new chips will increase its cost-efficiency per wafer by sixty percent.
The new 2Gb chip can be used to create power-efficient 4GB modules operating at 1.35 volts. Samsung expects power savings of 30 percent compared to a similar chip produced on a 50nm process, with a 4GB module consuming only three watts per hour when used in a newer-generation notebook.

“Our accelerated development of next generation 30nm-class DRAM should keep us in the most competitive position in the memory market,” said Soo-In Cho, President of Samsung Electronics' Memory Division.

Mass production of the new chips is expected to start in the second half of the year, with volume ramping up for the busy holiday shopping season.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What's wrong with this picture....?
By dflynchimp on 2/1/2010 9:04:40 PM , Rating: 2
One of those moments where one thing is not necessarily incorrect, but doesn't need all the wording.

Watts is Joules/seconds, which is already a energy/time scale.

We say our computers use 200/300/400 Watts, not Watts per hour, because in the end we're multiplying Watts by the hour itself to get total Joule (energy) usage.

Utility charges by the kW-hr because that term figures out into raw Joule usage, but when we talk consumption we just talk rates, in which case Joules/Seconds, or Watt (by itself) is more tha sufficient.

RE: What's wrong with this picture....?
By Wr on 2/2/2010 3:06:25 AM , Rating: 2
3 watts for the stick alone? In a notebook? Why, an 8-hour runtime would demand 24 W-hr from the battery just to feed the mem. Doesn't sound right.

By mikeyD95125 on 2/2/2010 3:17:42 PM , Rating: 2
My battery does 85W-hr. 3 watts of that an hour is a pretty small percentage of total capacity.

"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki