backtop


Print 126 comment(s) - last by Toolius.. on Feb 5 at 10:13 AM


Internet reaction of the Apple's new tablet the iPad has featured many mocking remarks. Many say the device's name sounds like a feminine hygiene product.
Many in public say the device's name sounds like a feminine hygiene product

On Wednesday Apple aired its long awaited tablet computer, which it dubbed the iPad.  Basically an oversized iPhone/iPod Touch, the new device hopes to capitalize on the popularity of these smaller products, filling the same niche as more traditional netbooks and UMPCs. 

Some Apple fans have indicated claimed the tablet will kill less full-featured e-Book readers like the Amazon Kindle or recent Sony Pocket Reader.  If that's the case, these competitors sure seem unusually nonchalant.

Sony, which actually competes with the tablet in two arenas -- eReaders (Sony Reader series) and mobile gaming (PSP Go) -- says that it may actually get a boost from the iPad. 

States  Steve Haber, president of Sony’s Digital Reading Division, "The introduction of another mobile device, which includes digital reading as part of its functionality, is a good thing for the digital book business.  Mobile devices with reading capabilities will play a key role in the paradigm shift from analog to digital content. At Sony, we’re focused on devices optimized for digital reading and believe that digital books sales will surpass print sales within five years, if not sooner."

Predicting the demise of print sales is certainly a bold move, but not a terribly new one; Amazon and Sony have been trumpeting that line for some time now.  The more interesting tidbit is that Sony actually thinks the increased attention about tablets and digital books surrounding the iPhone will actually help Sony's sales.

Sony certainly has a lot of business savvy in the field of digital books.  It is second only to Amazon in this arena, and it is estimated to own 35 percent of the market, selling an estimated 1 million units in 2009. 

One advantage it has over its new Apple competitor is perhaps a less obtrusive name; since its announcement the iPad has been lampooned by many readers who say it sounds like a feminine hygiene product.  Describes Annie Colbert on the blog "Holy Kaw!", "With "iTampon" quickly emerging as a trending Twitter topic, it's probably safe to say that many women found themselves cringing as they asked, 'Do any women work at Apple?'"

Ironically, the new Apple wonder-product shares its name with a fictional device devised in a MadTV skit -- an Apple feminine hygiene device called the iPad.  Writes "Dontstealmypen" a particularly prolific Twitter, "Will women send their husbands to the Apple store to buy iPads?" and "The iPad—Another embarrassing topic I get to discuss with my kids."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Bostonians won't be able to buy it
By Lazarus Dark on 1/30/2010 11:36:45 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly. It's a big iPhone/iPod Touch. Literally.

Why are people even talking about it? It's not new in the least. The only thing I can see interesting about it is the possible use as a home automation remote. Otherwise, a 200$ netbook would have the same or better functionality. That said, the Appleheads will still buy it. And even though it won't ever be close to the best selling touchpad device, like the iPod, it will still be the "popular" choice, kinda like winning the election with electoral votes, but not actually getting the most votes.

I can't believe I wasted 60 seconds on this post


RE: Bostonians won't be able to buy it
By ralniv on 1/30/10, Rating: 0
By Alexstarfire on 1/31/2010 9:40:22 AM , Rating: 1
Most people don't care about multitouch, even those who have the ability to use it on their MacBook, like my father. Slightly more useful for zooming.... and that's it. Everything else can be done easier and quicker via mouse or keyboard. Granted that for a tablet I can't exactly say how it'll work out. Seeing a review would be nice, but we've still got a wait for that. Same about the battery life. It'd be great to see 10 hours of video playback, but somehow I seriously doubt that.

Landscape or portrait orientation is also a rather moot point as well since any tablet should function like that. I'm sure for many a tablet though that it'd involve having to change some video options, but they could have an application running to let you do it through the taskbar like they do on laptops.

I can give you thinner and lighter, but it's not a bother for me and it shouldn't be for most people. If you can't carry around 3 pounds then you probably have far bigger problems than what "computer" is best for you. I carry my "heavy" laptop around with my school books and have zero problems. I don't know the exact weight of my laptop including the charger but 5+ lbs seems pretty reasonable. Hell, it doesn't even weigh as much as most of my school books.

I'd rather not have this thing be thinner either, but that's cause it will be easier to break if someone happened to sit on it. I've had people sit on my laptop before and it's perfectly fine. If this thing or the MacBook Air got sat on I'm sure it'd be quite fucked up.

Although, I can say that if you're going to be playing videos, especially HD videos, you're likely not going to be going with the $499 iPad. 16 GB of HD video isn't very much by itself, let alone with other apps and music on there. And if you want to stream most of the time then you got to at least get 3G cause you can't get WiFi everywhere. The extra things you have to buy to make this tablet functional put it well above $499. I think $130 just to be able to pay for a 3G service is absurd, but Apple has always been that way to me. Even if you only go up to the 32GB model with no 3G you're up to $600 which put's you out of range on just about every netbook, likely all but I haven't looked in a while, and you get less functionality.

I don't see any good wins for Apple in there.

I would also like to point out that you are quite right that netbooks and most laptops in general have crappy displays. Laptops suffer in a similar fate to all of Apple's computer, lack of customization. Having a nice display would be great if we had the option, but we almost never do unless it's a top-of-the-line model.... and even then not necessarily. I don't have a problem with it since my laptop is not my primary device for anything. It does gaming, videos, and everything else my desktop does but I only use it when I have to. Like at school. I'm not exactly worried about how awesome my game or video looks when I'm only playing it for short periods of time. Games even less so since that was not the purpose of this laptop and henceforth sucks at playing many games. If, however, I was to use a mobile computer primarily to play videos, pictures, games, image editing, etc... that I would love ,and need, a great display. Very few people fall into that category though. As such any display that allows you to do all those things decently will do just fine. You may not feel that way, but you would just fall into the same category as all the graphics whores for games do, to me anyway.

Simple fact that you can't multitask should turn everyone away in this day and age. That's just inexcusable.


“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki