Print 92 comment(s) - last by sdfasdgdhasdf.. on Jan 30 at 12:58 PM

Drivers of large vehicles are the latest to feel the wrath of the anti-texting movement

Driving is a privilege that most Americans take for granted. We drive to work, we drive to see family, and we run errands on the weekend to Home Depot or fend off soccer moms in their minivans at Target. However, technology continues to invade not only our lives, but also our vehicles, which is making the normally mundane act of driving more challenging.

From GPS units to cell phones to SYNC in-car infotainment systems, U.S. drivers have found new ways to distract themselves while driving thanks to technology (not to mention other favorites such as applying makeup, eating, reading the newspaper, etc.). Texting while driving is the latest craze to infect drivers and states around the country are swiftly implementing laws to make such activities illegal. Texting is already banned in 19 states, and 23 states are currently prepping their own laws to tackle the problem.

"Legislators are looking to see if it (texting) is enough of a safety issue that they need to intervene," said Anne Teigen told the USA Today. Teigen is a transportation specialist for the National Conference of State Legislatures. "They often get involved because there's a high-profile accident that had to do with texting. Also, because everybody has a cellphone now."

While states are currently going it alone in drafting "no texting while driving" laws, there are a few nationwide texting bans that drivers should heed. President Obama issued an executive order at the close of 2009 banning all federal workers -- rather, those on the job -- from texting while driving. The ban affects roughly four million federal workers.

Now a new, federal ban is coming down from the U.S. government. The latest nationwide texting ban applies to drivers of big rigs and buses. "We want the drivers of big rigs and buses and those who share the roads with them to be safe," said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "This is an important safety step and we will be taking more to eliminate the threat of distracted driving."

Drivers that choose not to abide by the new law face a fine of $2,750.

The bans from both the states and the U.S. government come on the heels of numerous studies which point out the dangerous consequences of texting and driving. A study by the University of Utah showed that drivers that text behind the wheels are six times more likely to be involved in a collision. The National Security Council notes that roughly 200,000 accidents are caused each drivers who text behind the wheel.

However, it's wishful thinking to believe that nationwide texting bans are going to stop people from partaking in America's favorite electronic pastime. Reuters has previously reported that teens aren't persuaded to stop their texting addictions just because there are laws on the books to prohibit the act.

"What I would say is that texting and cell phone devices have become such a component of life for teens and for young people that it's hard for them to differentiate between doing something normal and doing something wrong," remarked Steven Bloch, a senior research associate for the Automobile Club.

Considering that texting while driving isn't a habit that only affect teenagers, it's more than likely that drivers in a more "advanced state of age" are reluctant to stop the practice as well.

While the current nationwide texting bans affect a relatively small portion of the entire U.S. driver pool, Senator Chuck Schumer (Democrat, NY) is looking to change that. Senator Schumer has introduced legislation that would call for a federal ban on texting while driving. States that don't comply with the legislation would be see a 25 percent cut in the federal highway funds they receive.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Priviledge? BS.
By msomeoneelsez on 1/26/2010 5:12:32 PM , Rating: 2
Nowhere in the constitution does it say that the federal government can control what I eat, therefore I actually do have a constitutional right to eat a cheeseburger. Now, you may be able to argue about 'providing for public welfare' or one of the other clauses, but it would be a damn hard sell.

You bought that cheeseburger, right?

Unless you stole it, that cheeseburger is your property, therefor you have the right to do what you wish with it, so long as it does not violate the rights of others.

Also, the constitution does not allow for conflicts within itself; if there is a place where a conflict arises, then it is already marked out to say which part is to be followed above the other.

RE: Priviledge? BS.
By Proxes on 1/26/2010 5:51:50 PM , Rating: 2
If people have full right to do whatever they want with their own property then why is it illegal to burn down your own, paid off, home?

RE: Priviledge? BS.
By Camikazi on 1/26/2010 6:17:56 PM , Rating: 2
Endangering the life and property of others I'm guessing, since I doubt most people know how to control a fire that gets out of control.

RE: Priviledge? BS.
By msomeoneelsez on 1/27/2010 1:54:43 AM , Rating: 2
That, and you could argue damaging property values of those around you (just ask a real estate agent about that) and also, if you wish to be rather extreme about it, the pollutants put out by it damage others' rights to life, however, I would refrain from using the latter argument as it is rather absurd. Not like it will stop the EPA though.......

"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki