Print 108 comment(s) - last by zengqunhai3.. on Jan 29 at 3:59 PM

Rajendra Pachauri, head of the UN IPCC is being called on to resign after a botched climate report which made alarming claims. Mr. Pachauri, who holds no formal climate training, won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore and has been a vocal voice blasting climate criticism as "voodoo magic".  (Source: Mikhail Evstafiev)
IPCC's chairman under pressure to step down after embarrassing retraction

The United Nation's International Panel for Climate Change is supposed to be an objective international forum to discuss the possibility of climate change and its causation.  Some say that its reputation as an objective party has been compromised in recent years, by statements from its leadership indicating a clear pro-anthropogenic warming agenda.

At the center of the policy push is the IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri.  Mr. Pachauri has no formal education in climatology, yet was appointed in 2002 to lead arguably the world's most influential climatology panel.  Since, he has stirred up much controversy, suggesting that people internationally give up meat to fight climate change and supervising the publication of alarming climate change predictions.

However, Mr. Pachauri's days as IPCC Chairman may be nearing an end.  Mr. Pachauri has been forced to retract an alarming publication in which he claimed Himalayan Glaciers would melt by 2035.  Many in the general public and research community are calling for his resignation in the retraction's wake.

Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, vice chairman of the IPCC, is doing his best to defend his boss's controversial remarks.  He calls them a "human mistake" and comments, "Aren't mistakes human? Even the IPCC is a human institution and I do not know of any human institution that does not make mistakes, so of course it is a regrettable incident that we published that wrong description of the Himalayan glacier."

Mr. Pachauri's publication was made more controversial by his harsh criticism of those who questioned it.  He said that climate skeptics used "voodoo science" and urged the climate research community and international governments to ignore their concerns.

Mr van Ypersele, professor of climatology and environmental sciences at the Catholic University of Louvain defends these remarks.  He states, "I would personally not have used the voodoo science wording. I think humans can sometimes use words that are a bit too strong but it is certainly not a reason to ask for the resignation of a chairman who has done an excellent job. We are trying to do our best, we are going to reinforce the review procedures so the probability in the next report of such incidents happening is even lower. But to guarantee a zero fault product is probably not possible for any human enterprise."

Perhaps the more troublesome topic, however, is the report itself.  The IPCC 2007 report contained both the questionable glacier reference and highly questionable conclusions about global warming creating a bevy of natural disasters.  Before its recent retraction, the report was driving international climate legislation, including pending legislation in the U.S. that is estimate to leave Americans $9.4 trillion USD poorer.

The report was supposedly reviewed by the IPCC's 2,000 members.  Argues Mr. van Ypsersele, "We are trying to do the best job we can in assessing the quality information about climate change issues in all its dimensions and some do not like the conclusions of our work. Now it is true we made a mistake around the glacier issue, it is one mistake on one issue in a 3,000 page report. We are going to reinforce the procedures to try this does not happen again."

He claims the retraction will not impact the publication's credibility and stands behind the report's other controversial claims, including the prediction of natural catastrophe.  He states, "I would like to submit that this could increase the credibility of the IPCC not decrease it. Why is that? Would you trust someone who has admitted an error and is ready to learn from his or her mistake or someone who claims to be unassailable? The IPCC does not claim to be unassailable, when there is a good reason to admit a mistake we do it, but for the rest of IPCC conclusions we stand by it very strongly"

Mr. Pachauri, who holds advanced degrees in industrial engineering and economics, has blasted Westerners for leading an "unsustainable" lifestyle.  Curiously, though, according to the British newspaper, The Telegraph, "[Pachauri] enjoys a lavish personal lifestyle; his Delhi home is in the Golf Links area, the most expensive stretch of residential real estate in India, and he is famous for his '$1,000 suits'."

Al Gore and Mr. Pachauri were joint recipients of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for their warming work.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The AGW farce is almost over
By porkpie on 1/26/2010 10:47:58 AM , Rating: 5
Luckily, no one but a few loose nuts believes in AGW any more. It's a shame we wasted so much money on it, but people are never very rational at times.

BTW, kudos to DT on their GW reporting. I remember you began breaking these stories 2-3 years back, when the rest of the media was still peddling the nonsense.

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By Nfarce on 1/26/2010 11:27:56 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah, better late than never. I read somewhere that a Pew poll showed that out of 20 problems people in this nation (US) are concerned about, climate change ranked dead last .

Just as recently as late last year those who believed in this nonsense up to punishing us all both economically and legislatively called we who question the validity of AGW "deniers" and "flat earthers."

That's not to say of course that living cleaner for the environment, from backyard creeks to oceans, is a bad thing. But to even attempt to ram/force us to live a certain way including what we EAT and to tax the hell out of corporations and "rich" nations (and even individuals) is pure nanny statist fascism.

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By porkpie on 1/26/2010 11:38:53 AM , Rating: 5
The sad thing is that this dishonesty about AGW is going to do more to set back the environmental movement than any ten oil companies together ever could.

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By kattanna on 1/26/2010 11:50:10 AM , Rating: 2
that i will agree with.

there is still real pollution issues we should be addressing that seem to have been forgotten about in all this noise of CO2. contaminated drinking water is a REAL issue effecting people TODAY.

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By Ticholo on 1/26/10, Rating: 0
RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By kattanna on 1/26/2010 5:39:58 PM , Rating: 2
Have you considered that AGW CO2 may be the VERY THING contaminating our water?

LOL, im actually surprised environmentalists havn't gone after soda for the nasty CO2 it contains

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By JediJeb on 1/26/2010 12:09:04 PM , Rating: 4
Define Environmental Movement. People looking to make their lives more efficient and less polluting will still be doing so because it will save money. Those who are crying "Save the Planet" usually do just as much harm to their movement as this report. We should pollute less, but that doesn't include CO2 as most want now days. Most pollution is already controlled by some type of regulation and much of it has already been cleaned up. The Environmental Laboratory I work for has seen very little cleanup work in the past 10 years, when 20 years ago it was our bread and butter. Now days noone even gets excited if a power transformer explodes because most have been cleaned of the PCBs and replaced with safe silicon oil. Even the companies that were doing the cleanup work on these are shutting down because there are almost none with PCBs left in existance. Asbestos removal is still going but has slowed very much. Most work for us now is monitoring waste streams from industrial plants to make sure they don't try to slip something in without being caught or more often have a leak somewhere in the process.

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By Kurz on 1/26/2010 1:51:57 PM , Rating: 3
Dont forget about the alternative energy movement.
Sad to say this, the people who said AGW was real did more harm than good.

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By Reclaimer77 on 1/26/2010 1:56:39 PM , Rating: 1
The sad thing is that this dishonesty about AGW is going to do more to set back the environmental movement than any ten oil companies together ever could.

Why is that sad ?

Only the lunatic fringe believes we're "killing the planet". The rest of the "movement" are hippies and loudmouths and, of course, hypocrites.

I hate activists, and environmental groups are the worst. I'll take those 10 oil companies over them anyday.

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By SPOOFE on 1/26/2010 3:06:32 PM , Rating: 3
It's sad because some of us remember going for a little stroll, just a few decades ago, and having trouble breathing afterwards due to the smog. Some of us don't care so much about the fwuffy widdle critters in the forest as we do about ourselves and members of our own species. I love not having arsenic in my drinking water, for example.

If you want some fun, do a Google on the Santa Susanna pass in Northwest LA county, the site of the third worst nuclear accident in the world. The rates of leukemia up there are horrendous.

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By Reclaimer77 on 1/26/10, Rating: 0
RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By SPOOFE on 1/26/2010 3:49:07 PM , Rating: 4
You're on crack, and being from LA, I know a thing or two about crackhead behavior.

The dangers of smog in LA have been all but eliminated; and that's the point I was making, that those are the sorts of anti-pollution steps that work and make sense and have a direct benefit for people. Where the rest of your nonsense came from, I have no idea... oh wait, yeah I do: Crack. :D

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By tallcool1 on 1/26/2010 12:09:28 PM , Rating: 2
AGW (Al Gore Warming), which in this 'Public Priorities 2010 Survey", is LAST on the list of concerns of the people:

RE: The AGW farce is almost over
By FITCamaro on 1/26/2010 11:22:43 PM , Rating: 2
Unfortunately there is an extremely large collection of those nuts in the US government at the moment.

Of course one could argue they don't believe it, just use it to push the country over to socialism.

"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki