Print 108 comment(s) - last by zengqunhai3.. on Jan 29 at 3:59 PM

Rajendra Pachauri, head of the UN IPCC is being called on to resign after a botched climate report which made alarming claims. Mr. Pachauri, who holds no formal climate training, won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore and has been a vocal voice blasting climate criticism as "voodoo magic".  (Source: Mikhail Evstafiev)
IPCC's chairman under pressure to step down after embarrassing retraction

The United Nation's International Panel for Climate Change is supposed to be an objective international forum to discuss the possibility of climate change and its causation.  Some say that its reputation as an objective party has been compromised in recent years, by statements from its leadership indicating a clear pro-anthropogenic warming agenda.

At the center of the policy push is the IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri.  Mr. Pachauri has no formal education in climatology, yet was appointed in 2002 to lead arguably the world's most influential climatology panel.  Since, he has stirred up much controversy, suggesting that people internationally give up meat to fight climate change and supervising the publication of alarming climate change predictions.

However, Mr. Pachauri's days as IPCC Chairman may be nearing an end.  Mr. Pachauri has been forced to retract an alarming publication in which he claimed Himalayan Glaciers would melt by 2035.  Many in the general public and research community are calling for his resignation in the retraction's wake.

Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, vice chairman of the IPCC, is doing his best to defend his boss's controversial remarks.  He calls them a "human mistake" and comments, "Aren't mistakes human? Even the IPCC is a human institution and I do not know of any human institution that does not make mistakes, so of course it is a regrettable incident that we published that wrong description of the Himalayan glacier."

Mr. Pachauri's publication was made more controversial by his harsh criticism of those who questioned it.  He said that climate skeptics used "voodoo science" and urged the climate research community and international governments to ignore their concerns.

Mr van Ypersele, professor of climatology and environmental sciences at the Catholic University of Louvain defends these remarks.  He states, "I would personally not have used the voodoo science wording. I think humans can sometimes use words that are a bit too strong but it is certainly not a reason to ask for the resignation of a chairman who has done an excellent job. We are trying to do our best, we are going to reinforce the review procedures so the probability in the next report of such incidents happening is even lower. But to guarantee a zero fault product is probably not possible for any human enterprise."

Perhaps the more troublesome topic, however, is the report itself.  The IPCC 2007 report contained both the questionable glacier reference and highly questionable conclusions about global warming creating a bevy of natural disasters.  Before its recent retraction, the report was driving international climate legislation, including pending legislation in the U.S. that is estimate to leave Americans $9.4 trillion USD poorer.

The report was supposedly reviewed by the IPCC's 2,000 members.  Argues Mr. van Ypsersele, "We are trying to do the best job we can in assessing the quality information about climate change issues in all its dimensions and some do not like the conclusions of our work. Now it is true we made a mistake around the glacier issue, it is one mistake on one issue in a 3,000 page report. We are going to reinforce the procedures to try this does not happen again."

He claims the retraction will not impact the publication's credibility and stands behind the report's other controversial claims, including the prediction of natural catastrophe.  He states, "I would like to submit that this could increase the credibility of the IPCC not decrease it. Why is that? Would you trust someone who has admitted an error and is ready to learn from his or her mistake or someone who claims to be unassailable? The IPCC does not claim to be unassailable, when there is a good reason to admit a mistake we do it, but for the rest of IPCC conclusions we stand by it very strongly"

Mr. Pachauri, who holds advanced degrees in industrial engineering and economics, has blasted Westerners for leading an "unsustainable" lifestyle.  Curiously, though, according to the British newspaper, The Telegraph, "[Pachauri] enjoys a lavish personal lifestyle; his Delhi home is in the Golf Links area, the most expensive stretch of residential real estate in India, and he is famous for his '$1,000 suits'."

Al Gore and Mr. Pachauri were joint recipients of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for their warming work.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why stop?
By SublimeSimplicity on 1/26/2010 10:45:55 AM , Rating: 5
I agree... I think at this point they need to disolve the whole thing and start from scratch. Maybe this time with some scientists and not "scientists".

The United Nation's International Panel for Climate Change is supposed to be an objective international forum to discuss the possibility of climate change and its causation.

Frankly, when this sentence almost causes me to LOL, any chance of redeeming their credibility is lost.

RE: Why stop?
By SPOOFE on 1/26/2010 2:10:45 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe this time with some scientists and not "scientists".

They're sciencists: Guys that are good at sounding sciency.

RE: Why stop?
By Ticholo on 1/26/2010 2:46:18 PM , Rating: 4
I don't even know why they should start over.
Climate. Changes.
There. No more to discuss.

And studying the "possibility" of climate changing is indeed hilarious. Try replacing Climate Change with Sun Rise.

RE: Why stop?
By SPOOFE on 1/26/2010 2:58:41 PM , Rating: 2
Climate. Changes.
There. No more to discuss.

Plenty more to discuss. HOW does the climate change? By how much? At what rate? What changes will societies have to make to properly adapt to that climate change? Will we need to move communities? Will we need to move agriculture? Will we need genetically enhanced crops that will be more resistant to temperature extremes?

The very nature of climate change makes it essentially necessary, for long-term survival and thrival, to develop solid anticipation of climate shifts. The myopic focus on "man causing climate change" has resulted in a surprisingly sad amount of research conducted from the point of view of climate change being (almost) entirely a natural occurrence, and thus many of the specifics are still unknown.

RE: Why stop?
By webdragon on 1/26/2010 3:55:35 PM , Rating: 2
Indeed. classic case of "treating the symptoms instead of the cause"

RE: Why stop?
By snyper256 on 1/28/2010 2:40:32 AM , Rating: 2
There's not even any reason to anticipate a problem, though. What evidence is there that any sort of climate change could pose a threat?

It's actual toxic (unlike CO2) pollution that the corporations and governments need to fix, not a little climate fluctuation. I seriously doubt that the world has never seen similar temperatures in the past millions of years.

RE: Why stop?
By Guyver on 1/26/2010 3:09:25 PM , Rating: 2
IPCC lead contributing author even said over 2 years ago that the IPCC is not objective due to its structure to promote political agendas:

RE: Why stop?
By FITCamaro on 1/26/2010 11:17:21 PM , Rating: 2
They have scientists....from this high school

"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki