Print 65 comment(s) - last by sdfasdgdhasdf.. on Jan 30 at 1:08 PM

China has defended its internet policing and accuses the U.S. of being hypocritical and carrying out censorship of its own.  (Source: Macon Daily)
China's confrontation with U.S. and Google continues

The rift between Google and China has affected many in the tech industry.  The world's largest internet firm has taken on the world's largest nation in response to a theft of intellectual property that started with a flaw in Microsoft's Internet Explorer and ended in a trail of cyber evidence leading back to China's doorstep. 

Now, even as Google threatens to pull out of the Chinese search business completely, shutting down, the U.S. government has stepped up to the plate challenging China to listen to the concerns of Google and other firms.  U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton delivered sharp remarks criticizing China's duality of cyber-lawlessness and harsh censorship of certain materials.

Now, China is responding indignantly to the criticism.  A spokesperson for China's State Council Information Office, the organization that helps to filter China's internet traffic addressed the U.S. governments criticism, remarking, "[China] bans using the Internet to subvert state power and wreck national unity, to incite ethnic hatred and division, to promote cults and to distribute content that is pornographic, salacious, violent or terrorist.  China has an ample legal basis for punishing such harmful content, and there is no room for doubting this. This is completely different from so-called restriction of Internet freedom."

The response aired Monday on China's state run government website,

China has an internet population of over 384 million, but it continues to tightly control the content its users can view, filtering traffic through a system that is dubbed "The Great Firewall" by U.S. observers.  Additionally, over 120 million users in China access the web from their mobile devices, adding a new challenge for internet censors.

China's dispute with the U.S. however, may be a sign of tensions outside the tech arena boiling over.  The U.S. recently announced that it would be selling modern weapons to Taiwan, a renegade state that China still insists it owns.  U.S. President Barack Obama will also meet with the Dalai Lama, Tibet's exiled Buddhist leader, in coming months.  Despite his dogma of pacifism, Chinese officials call the Dalai Lama a dangerous extremist for promoting Tibetan separatism.

Jin Canrong, a professor of international relations at Renmin University in Beijing, comments, "This year, we're seeing problems over trade, the Dalai Lama, and U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan coming to the surface.  The politicization and ideological turn of the Google case could make it more difficult to work together. The basic need for cooperation, economically and diplomatically, hasn't changed, but each of these issues could disrupt cooperation from day to day."

Tibet is one of the key issues that is chilling relations between the U.S. and China.  Another is signs of censorship and oppression stemming from internet activity.  Late last, year a Chinese blogger and author Liu Xiabo was sentenced to 11 years in prison for spreading subversive writings on the internet.  China has banned a variety of U.S. websites including YouTube, Twitter and Facebook in recent months.

China's government denies that the Google attacks originated from within Chinese borders.  And state-run Chinese newspapers on Monday blasted the U.S. as hypocritical.  Editorials accused the U.S. of exploiting video-sharing site YouTube and micro-blogging site Twitter to drive unrest in Iran.  They also point to current and pending legislation on the U.S. state and national level that would impose government filters on the internet content that minors can view.  Proclaims one column, "This 'Internet freedom' that is being promoted everywhere is nothing more than a foreign policy tool, a fantasy of freedom."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

If Jason Mick, you know your history....
By yomamafor1 on 1/25/2010 10:28:27 AM , Rating: 5
...then you would know Taiwan is NOT a renegade state, but rather a self-governed island that China has insisted it owns.

By Kosh401 on 1/25/2010 10:57:08 AM , Rating: 5
But "renegade state" sounds so much awesomer!

RE: If Jason Mick, you know your history....
By Penti on 1/25/2010 11:02:06 AM , Rating: 2
Lol, it's a sovereign state, however US has promised not to prop them up with weapons.

Relations any way are improving between China and Taiwan. It's just weapons/military that are a very touchy subject.

But people should really accept that it was US who toke up diplomatic relations and trade with China. If they didn't want relations with the dictatorships, then they wouldn't have supported Korea, Taiwan, China and so forth. And the world wouldn't have let them have the United Nations seat that taiwan occupied if they didn't accept China. This pressure about freedoms are just silly from the historic perspective, US did nothing to create democracy in South Korea or Taiwan, they had to do it themselves. As they should.

By Solandri on 1/25/2010 2:28:29 PM , Rating: 2
This pressure about freedoms are just silly from the historic perspective, US did nothing to create democracy in South Korea or Taiwan, they had to do it themselves. As they should.

I would argue the U.S. forcing democracy on those nations would be just as bad as China forcing communism on those nations. The very definition of self-government is that the people in those countries have to decide for themselves the type of government they wish to have. The Right Thing for the U.S. to do was to stand aside and let the people there decide their own political fate. Not forcibly re-make the country in our image.

RE: If Jason Mick, you know your history....
By amanojaku on 1/25/2010 11:02:12 AM , Rating: 1
China has insisted it owns.
For good reason. The Dutch colonized Taiwan back in the 1500's. Prior to that Taiwan was largely aboriginal tribes. The Qing Dynasty took control of Taiwan from the Dutch in the 1600's. At that point Taiwan consisted of three ethnic groups: the aborigines, the Chinese and the Dutch. The Dutch and the Chinese are responsible for the creation of modern Taiwan.

The Japanese finally got their grabby hands on Taiwan in 1895 after the conclusion of the First Sino-Japanese War. When Japan got its ass kicked in WWII Japan relinquished control of Taiwan. When China experienced the Chinese Civil War the ROC leaders, loosing, fled to Taiwan. Taiwan then declared sovereignty.

There's the crux of the problem. Japan never said Taiwan is free, nor could it. It stole Taiwan from China, so it had to give it back. But China's civil war led to the problem of "who controls China?" No one wanted to take sides so they left it as a blank, which the ROC took advantage of when it fled.

RE: If Jason Mick, you know your history....
By Donovan on 1/25/2010 11:37:02 AM , Rating: 5
For good reason.
When China experienced the Chinese Civil War the ROC leaders, loosing, fled to Taiwan. Taiwan then declared sovereignty.
Since Taiwan is the refuge of the original pre-Communist Chinese goverment, I would say it was really the Communists who "declared sovereignity" over the portion they managed to take over. At the time of the revolution the original government already had sovereign rule over the island of Taiwan...and they didn't lose it.

If anything it is Taiwan that has a claim of ownership over the rest of China; however, as much as I dislike the new Chinese government I see no point in denying that a revolution took place and is settled. That said, it also makes no sense for China to claim ownership over land they failed to conquer...there's no "winner take all" rule in civil war.

If the South had been successful in breaking away from the US, we would not expect someone to measure the two sides today and award the smaller portion to the larger one.

RE: If Jason Mick, you know your history....
By MamiyaOtaru on 1/25/2010 12:47:13 PM , Rating: 3
How about "the people who live in Taiwan don't want to be part of China"?

By AnnihilatorX on 1/25/2010 1:08:45 PM , Rating: 2
3 options:

1) leave the state
2) don't do anything
3) start a revolution

I live in Britain and don't want to be part of it either.
I chose the 2nd option.

RE: If Jason Mick, you know your history....
By albus on 1/25/2010 1:25:27 PM , Rating: 2
No kidding! The citizens of Taiwan decide whether they want to be part of China, in true democratic fashion. Hu and his men sitting a thousand miles away should not be allowed to control the Taiwanese without their consent. Without the will of the people, democracy is not possible.

By Akrovah on 1/25/2010 4:03:39 PM , Rating: 2
Without the will of the people, democracy is not possible.

Very true, but China is not a democracy.

RE: If Jason Mick, you know your history....
By omnicronx on 1/25/2010 3:17:57 PM , Rating: 1
You can say that about anything.. Lets say I'm a US citizen that no longer wants to be a part of the US? Can I turn my life into a family guy episode and declare my property Omnitopia?

For all intents and purposes Taiwan is part of China, that being said, why China even cares is beyond me. All that territory and they complain about an island in which its citizens do not want to be part of their country anyways. China most likely knows that pursuing Taiwan could turn into the next Tibet, and its just not worth it.

By Laereom on 1/25/2010 10:28:25 PM , Rating: 4
Lies and ignorance.

Taiwan was never even touched by the PRC. They've ruled themselves de facto since the revolution. They have their own fully functional government, tax district, democracy, and culture. They speak a different language. PRC troops and officials haven't so much set foot on Taiwan except in a diplomatic fashion.

They have a GDP per capita a little under ten times that of the PRC. They are a developed nation.

You may be familiar with a few of their iconic companies, such as:

And the list really does go on.

These people have built their own nation in spite of not even being recognized internationally as a country. They've done it from nothing, with a huge, corrupt dictatorship a stone's throw away. They own themselves; the PRC has no claim over them.

By mxnerd on 1/28/2010 7:37:48 PM , Rating: 2
I'm from Taiwan and I absolutely know that Taiwan is NOT part of China.

China military never one day is on the island, never collect a single penny of tax from Taiwan's citizens.

We have our own President, our own government , our own congress, all elected by Taiwan's citizens. And we have our own military.

Just because China declare Taiwan's is part of China does not mean that's the truth. Just like if I declare I own your house does not mean your property belongs to me.

"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki