Print 78 comment(s) - last by fasfdhfd0000.. on Jan 29 at 4:04 PM

Tesla Model S  (Source: Tesla Motors)
Let the money flow...

The federal government seems to be quite happy with dishing out money for environmentally friendly ventures, and there are plenty of companies that are willing to take the funds and put them to good use. One such company is Tesla Motors.

Tesla Motors is probably most notable for its sexy all-electric Roadster. The $100,000+ sports car, which is based on the Lotus Elise chassis, has a driving range of 244 miles – one Tesla Roadster, however, was able to travel 313 miles on a single charge -- and can zip to 60 mph in less than four seconds. However, Tesla is looking to take its electric car-building prowess to a somewhat more mainstream audience with its four-door Model S electric sedan.

This is where the federal government steps in to work its magic. According to the Detroit News, Tesla Motors today closed on a deal to secure $465 million in low-cost loans from the Energy Department. The funds will be used to build manufacturing plants in California for the Model S and its powertrain.

The company was originally approved for the loan back in June of 2009. The $465 million will come from the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program which is providing a total of $25 billion to automakers that develop new fuel efficient vehicles. Other notable names to get in on the loans include Nissan ($1.6 billion) and Ford ($5.9 billion).

"This is an investment in our clean energy future that will create jobs and reduce our dependence on foreign oil," said Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

"It will help build a customer base and begin laying the foundation for American leadership in the growing electric vehicles industry. This is part of a sustained effort to develop and commercialize technologies that will be broadly deployed throughout the American auto industry."

As previously reported by DailyTech, the Model S will have a driving range of up to 300 miles and can dash to 60 mph in 5.5 seconds. The fetching sedan weighs in at a portly 4,000 pounds (1,200 pounds of which comes from its lithium-ion battery pack). If all goes according to plan, the base Model S will cost around $50,000 after a government-backed $7,500 tax credit is taken into consideration. For comparison, the Chevrolet Volt is expected to cost in the “low 30s” after the $7,500 tax credit is applied. At that price point, GM still contends that it can make a profit.

The Model S is scheduled to go into production in 2012 and yearly output is pegged at 20,000 units per year.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: clue me in on this...
By lelias2k on 1/21/2010 8:57:40 PM , Rating: 2
If you think the US won WWII by itself, maybe you should take some history lessons first...

The US can be an amazing country when it comes to help others, but it can just as easily go in the other direction too. We're not a country of saints...

RE: clue me in on this...
By DigitalFreak on 1/21/2010 9:20:43 PM , Rating: 1
If the US hadn't stepped in all of Europe would be walking the goose step. Of course either way France still would have surrendered. It's what they do best.

RE: clue me in on this...
By lelias2k on 1/22/2010 4:10:00 AM , Rating: 2
It's easy to remain strong when nobody can touch you... The US was in a great position by being protected by the two biggest oceans in the world. Had the Germans finished the V9 the whole story could have been different.

That said, yes, they helped, but other countries did too.

And to say the US didn't get anything is return is absurd. Go back to the history books and you will know what I'm talking about.

RE: clue me in on this...
By SPOOFE on 1/24/2010 12:56:35 PM , Rating: 2
It's easy to remain strong when nobody can touch you... The US was in a great position by being protected by the two biggest oceans in the world.

Yes, that is a REASON for why the US was so instrumental in the war effort. That also explains why the US was so crucial to the rebuilding effort, as well: It was pretty much the only industrialized country essentially untouched (property and material-wise) after the war. That's also why the US was in such a prime position to rise as a superpower, when prior to the World Wars it was still a fairly minor player on the global stage.

RE: clue me in on this...
By BZDTemp on 1/22/2010 12:36:25 PM , Rating: 2
LOL if it wasn't for France there would be no US.

Spend less time watching Fox News and more time reading and you may learn something.

RE: clue me in on this...
By SandmanWN on 1/22/2010 3:36:03 PM , Rating: 2
Wrong, the US fought the British for 5 years before French troops landed and actually contributed to the war. Of course they remained neutral until the US actually had the upper hand and showed they might win this war after all.

Not to mention the French were devastated after the Seven Years war and was in no position to be of assistance to anyone. They managed a good showing in the last year of the war. Some troops finally hit the ground and a major naval battle. But at the time the British were backed up in Yorktown ready for savior from the British navy. But we can't let that get in the way of any facts.

Its unlikely they would have ever been able to return in sufficient numbers to do any good, the US was growing far too fast at this point.

Maybe if you stopped sucking the BBC's teet you might learn a thing or two yourself.

RE: clue me in on this...
By SPOOFE on 1/24/2010 12:57:25 PM , Rating: 2
If it weren't for Germany we wouldn't have needed France, so the Euros cancel each other out.

"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki