backtop


Print 56 comment(s) - last by Sahrin.. on Jan 25 at 1:16 PM


Windows 7 is now officially supported for Macs using Boot Camp to dual boot.
Hi, I'm a Mac running Windows 7

Some Mac owners have a dirty little secret that might exclude them from the Apple cool club if they let it slip -- they primarily use Windows on their Mac computers.  Some users purchase MacBook Pros for their strong battery life on a relatively high-end hardware spec and for their slender, lightweight ultra-portable unibody design.

Added perks of Mac ownership include being able to legally install the iPhone app development environment and develop and test OS X applications.  However, OS X, by itself, leaves users with many glaring deficiencies, chiefly an inability to play most modern PC games.

Boot Camp, first introduced in 2006, fixes that by allowing Windows to be installed on Macs and users to dual boot into their OS of choice.  Ever since Windows has been many Mac owners' dirty little secret.

Now Apple has announced that Windows 7, Microsoft's popular new operating system, will be officially supported for the first time with Apple Boot Camp 3.1.  The update supports 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows 7 Home Premium, Professional, and Ultimate.

The 32-bit version weighs in at 380.73MB, while the 64-bit version takes up 274.58MB.  The only catch is that you (officially) have to a copy of Windows Vista or Windows XP to install Windows 7 (we did a clean install on the previous version of Boot Camp, though, so this may just be legal rhetoric).

The Boot Camp upgrade fixes the problem of the red LED adjacent to the audio port always being on, trackpad issues, and incompatibility with Apple's Magic Mouse and wireless keyboard.  Apple Update should offer users already running Windows 7 in Boot Camp, the latest version.  For those afraid of using Windows 7 in Boot Camp, take it from us -- its a pretty painless experience, and we've only run into few issues, so far (the problems we did experience were almost solely audio related).

There are also new drivers to help support Windows 7.  For owners of MacBook Pros or MacBooks you also want to grab the Graphics Firmware Update 1.0.  iMac owners should instead install the iMac Late 2009 Windows 7 Drivers.

Mac owners who do use OS X, even occasionally, should also grab Apple's first security update of 2010, which offers protection against some potentially serious security threats.  The update, Security Update 2010-001, is available for Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard (21.90MB), Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Server (248.11MB), and Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Client (159.58MB).  It can also be snagged via Apple Update and features fixes for potentially dangerous vulnerabilities in CoreAudio, the Flash Player plug-in, OpenSSL, Image RAW, and Image IO.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By jonmcc33 on 1/20/2010 10:10:45 AM , Rating: 0
I have seriously hated touchpads on laptops. They annoy me to no end...to the point that I just use a USB optical mouse instead.

I wouldn't go boasting about some multi-touch trackpad as a perk to spending more money. I am sure most people feel the same way about touchpads on laptops. At least everyone I have talked to does.


RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 1/20/2010 10:37:52 AM , Rating: 2
I pointed to a number of reason why I chose my MBP, and the trackpad wasn't even in the top 3...

That being said, I generally dislike trackpads as well, but I find the trackpad on the MBP quite enjoyable. Previously, I would always have a Bluetooth mouse or other wireless mouse with me at all times to avoid using the trackpad on my previous notebooks; however, I now use the multi-touch trackpad almost exclusively wherever I go.

But then again, it's all about personal preference. Keep hatin' trackpads, and I'll keep enjoying mine :-)


RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By WUMINJUN on 1/25/2010 9:15:58 AM , Rating: 1
http://www.brand-bar.com
New to Hong Kong : Winter Dress

---**** NHL Jersey Woman $ 40 ---**** NFL Jersey $ 35
---**** NBA Jersey $ 34 ---**** MLB Jersey $ 35
---**** Jordan Six Ring_m $36 ---**** Air Yeezy_m $ 45
---**** T-Shirt_m $ 25 ---**** Jacket_m $ 36
---**** Hoody_m $ 50 ---**** Manicure Set $ 20 ... ...
http://www.brand-bar.com


RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By deltadeltadelta on 1/20/2010 10:42:31 AM , Rating: 2
I completely agree. I despise (DESPISE) touchpads. I feel like I am petting my computer with my index finger everytime I want to move the pointer around. Anything is better. Pointing stick, external mouse, trackball. This has nothing to do with the conversation, but I just had to get that off my chest.


RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 1/20/2010 10:51:12 AM , Rating: 2
I thought that anything would be better as well (re: TouchPads) which was one of the reasons why I welcomed to the move to my previous ThinkPad X300. However, after extended use, pushing around the Trackpoint with my index finger became irritating and uncomfortable (constantly applying pressure to a single point on my finger wasn't exactly ergonomic after extended use).

And let's not even get on the subject of Trackpoint "drift" that would crop up at least once a day requiring me to wiggle the thing around to get it to stop.

With the multitouch trackpad, I don't have to worry about hitting the right "scroll zone" on the far right side of the pad like you do with traditional trackpads. I just simply use two fingers to scroll up and down, three to page up/down, three fingers to navigate forward/back, and four to show the desktop.

It's almost become second nature to me now and I find myself trying to do gestures with my wife's XP netbook whenever I try to use it :-)


RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By Adul on 1/21/2010 12:23:54 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
It's almost become second nature to me now and I find myself trying to do gestures with my wife's XP netbook whenever I try to use it :-)


Does your wife know about this! :o

wife, that sounds so off for some reason.


RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By reader1 on 1/20/10, Rating: -1
RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By bhieb on 1/20/2010 12:53:21 PM , Rating: 5
Point of contention. Apple makes evolutionary products not revolutionary. They take someone else's idea and (arguably) perfect it. They certainly were not the first touch enabled smartphone, but they did a lot right with the iPhone. Not the first laptop maker, but they make a nice platform. Definitely not the first trackpad but a very nice one no doubt.

All of these are evolutionary improvements to someone else's idea (granted they usually add a feature or 2).


RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By WUMINJUN on 1/25/2010 9:19:49 AM , Rating: 1
http://www.brand-bar.com
New to Hong Kong : Winter Dress

---**** NHL Jersey Woman $ 40 ---**** NFL Jersey $ 35
---**** NBA Jersey $ 34 ---**** MLB Jersey $ 35
---**** Jordan Six Ring_m $36 ---**** Air Yeezy_m $ 45
---**** T-Shirt_m $ 25 ---**** Jacket_m $ 36
---**** Hoody_m $ 50 ---**** Manicure Set $ 20 ... ...
http://www.brand-bar.com


RE: WIndows on a Mac. Why?
By PrezWeezy on 1/20/2010 4:46:16 PM , Rating: 2
I, actually, would prefer a touchpad to a mouse any day. I find them far easier to use and more acurate. The only time I wouldn't rather have a touchpad is when playing a game simply because of the need to move quickly; which a mouse is far better at providing. You don't have to love them, but some people do.

As far as my Mac, I hate the thing. Granted it's a4.9 G4 and not "the latest" but half the time it doesn't wakeup from sleep, I have to go into the terminal to display hidden files or file extensions, the keyboard is terrible (I know the new ones are much much better, but I still don't like the tactile feel of Apple keyboards) and I just don't like the way OSX is organized. It seems very...hap-hazard to me. I have to open the hard drive to see the applications?

Some of my complaints with it are really that important I know. There is a new version out there and it would be like complaining about XP when the problem might be fixed in Vista/7. However, I believe that OSX is much harder to use for what I do on the computer. I'm not typical, I admit, but all that really matters for my opinion is what I want to do with it.

All that aside, I do think the batteries in MBP's are a rather impressive. They can pack a lot more power into those than Sony or Asus or any of the other makers seem to be able to.


"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki