backtop


Print 98 comment(s) - last by MrPoletski.. on Jan 14 at 6:15 AM

Arrgghhh this will show those pesky pirates -- we'll cut one of our hottest items!

Netflix revolutionized the movie rental industry when it began offering unlimited movie rentals for a monthly flat rate.  Since 2007, a $16.99 (plus tax) monthly membership fee has granted you access to up to three movies at a time, with unlimited exchanges.  While Blockbuster rushed similarly priced plans to market, it was arguably too little, too late -- Netflix was already a major player and owned many key patents.

Despite that resounding success, all is not rosy for Netflix.  Netflix has been under fire from movie industry, which claims its unlimited deliveries of new rentals is fueling rampant piracy of films.

Under pressure, Netflix just announced that it has incredibly consented to enter a deal with Warner Bros. that will essentially begin to kill its new release program under the premise of fighting piracy.  Under the agreement, Netflix agrees to not offer new releases until 28 days after the DVD/Blu-Ray release goes on sale in stores.

Netflix COO Ted Sarandos appears to have wholeheartedly embraced the idea, which he originally suggested to studios in 2007.  Netflix likely gets a major kick back from the deal, though; if the terms of Mr. Sarandos's original pitch hold true, Warner Bros. will cut its inventory costs with Netflix (the amount it charges the company for its movie stockpile) by 50 percent.

Describes Mr. Sarandos enthusiastically, "Creating a rental window is not a punitive action. It’s a decision that the retailers and studios can make together. If the studios can entice a rentailer to create a rental window, I believe that rentailers, studios and consumers can all benefit from it."

With that attitude and the mutually positive reaction from Warner Bros., it seems likely that other movie studios will follow in suit, signing agreements to cut inventory cost in exchange for no more new rentals.  Netflix is reportedly in advanced talks with Fox and Universal as well.  Other unnamed studios are also discussing similar plans with the rentailer.

For both Netflix and the movie studios the plan is a risky gamble.  Without new rentals, Netflix risks being undercut by Blockbuster.  While the inventory cost cuts ultimately result in a greater monetary gain on paper (as 70 percent of Netflix rentals are from older catalog titles, with approximately 30 percent coming from new releases), whether customers will stomach the change is questionable.

Likewise for movie studios, if customers do accept the deal, but it does not significantly affect buying rates/piracy, the studios stand to lose a great deal of money offering movies to Netflix at greatly reduced rates.  In all likelihood, the biggest loser, though, will be Netflix customers who may soon lose access to the hottest new rentals, which Blockbuster will continue to provide.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Piracy Smoke Screen
By ClassicRocker on 1/6/2010 11:02:45 PM , Rating: 3
This decision has nothing to do with piracy. The movie studios want you to buy not rent. They just don't to say this. The average Netflix user doesn't pirate. Those that do rent and copy wouldn't buy anyway. Netflix would like to get get rid of these latter users anyway since they rent too many movies.

I plan to cancel my Netflix membership and go with Blockbuster. When Blockbuster is preasured into a similar deal I will find alternate sources and everyone will lose money. If enough people follow my example then this BS will end.




RE: Piracy Smoke Screen
By cmdrdredd on 1/6/2010 11:08:52 PM , Rating: 2
Probably right here. Not much more to say.


RE: Piracy Smoke Screen
By Ytsejamer1 on 1/7/2010 10:35:35 AM , Rating: 2
Somewhere, the content delivery companies (comcast, tw, directv, etc) are celebrating for likely increased revenue from on-demand rentals.

Netflix and their users got hosed in this deal. Where it might not effect everyone, it's definitely going to be an annoyance for me. There are good movies I want to see, but do not want to see at the theater. Now I have to wait even longer for them to come out? Blech...but I suppose I'll just get used to the extra 28 day wait.

There is no way pirates are going to be effected at all...I don't think this was about the piracy issue anyway. It was about the delivery and retail companies, masked by the issue of piracy.


"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki