backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by nafhan.. on Jan 6 at 4:37 PM


  (Source: Lenovo)

Lenovo's Skylight, set to release in Spring of this year for $499 is the first Snapdragon (ARM) netbook. It will feature an impressive 10 hours of battery life and weigh less than 2 lb., about 2/3rds of the weight of a "hefty" Eee PC.  (Source: Lenovo via Gizmodo)
The x86 architecture may finally be getting a run for its money in the netbook world

The x86 central processing architecture, based on the Intel 8086 architecture (developed by Intel in 1978), has dominated virtually the entire desktop and notebook computer CPU market for the last two decades.

However, in another, far different, market the rival ARM architecture was plotting a comeback.  With an ARM processor in an estimated 98 percent of the over billion phones sold worldwide, the architecture used the mobile communications revolution to quietly gain a competitive position in total processing units worldwide.

Now ARM-based CPUs are preparing to storm the shores of the x86 architecture's most heavily fortified stronghold -- the personal computer.  There's a multitude of released or pending ARM-based entries, including the Freescale's i.MX, Marvell (formerly Intel) XScale, NVIDIA's Tegra, ST-Ericsson Nomadik, Qualcomm's Snapdragon, and the Texas Instruments OMAP product line.

Why are ARM platforms so promising?  Their mobile heritage has helped them develop ultra-low power envelopes.  Where as a Intel Atom N270 (the leading x86 netbook chip) plus 945GSM chipset has a TDP of 11.8 watts, the majority of current ARM system-on-a-chips (SOCs) consume under 2 watts at full load.

The Tegra is already powering the Zune HD's sweet graphics, and the Snapdragon (ARM Cortex A8) is expected to power the upcoming "Google Phone", set to be announced later today.  That same Qualcomm processor is also coming to the Lenovo Skylight, a just announced netbook, that may become the first ARM-based CPU netbook from a major manufacturer.

Set to lay the smackdown on Atom-based designs, the netbook features the Snapdragon 1 GHz chipset.  It boasts a 10 hour battery life, on par with the current best Atom-based netbooks (the current-gen. Asus Eee PC).  It also features an attractive "high-definition" 10.1" screen (exact resolution not yet specified).  The weight will reportedly be under 2 lb., quite nice when compared to "hefty" 2.8 lb. that the latest Eee PCs weigh in at.

The netbook also features a gadget interface for speedy and painless access to favorites like Gmail or Facebook.  It comes with integrated 3G and Wi-Fi, which are built into the Snapdragon chipset.  AT&T will be the primary service provider -- though it may be possible to connect to other providers with the laptop.

The netbook will go on sale in the Spring of this year for $499 -- you will have to purchase an AT&T service plan separately (though you may get a subsidy if you purchase with a plan -- specifics haven't yet been announced).

The 1 GHz Snapdragon is just a taste of the ARM goodness that's to come, though.  There's incoming ARM dual-core designs, including 1.5 GHz Snapdragon 45 nm variant, that reportedly use 0.5 watts or less (versus 8 watts on the comparable Intel Atom 330).  The aforementioned designs from other vendors are also expected to soon be competing against x86 designs in the netbook sector.

Intel's Atom processor, which helped to give birth to the netbook movement, is unlikely to go away completely, even in the face of vastly more efficient ARM-based designs.  At the very least, though, it will be forced to lower its power envelope greatly in order to continue to thrive.  And that's good news for consumers, who dream of one day having 15-hour, 20-hour, even, long battery life fully functional netbooks.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Meh
By Suntan on 1/5/2010 1:18:53 PM , Rating: 2
10 hours of battery is not worth $500 imo.

I think long battery life is a little overblown. 2 hours is not enough, but 10 hours seems excessive if it results in an additional $100 to $200 in product cost.

ymmv.

-Suntan




RE: Meh
By Keeir on 1/5/2010 4:35:17 PM , Rating: 3
I think to be considered is the hit that WiFi or 3G place on the device. Although 10 hours is probably reached (or maybe even exceeded) at minimum power draw, adding 3g probably reduces the run time to 3-4 hours.

I used to think the same things about battery life, then I got a Acer 1810T netbook, which I now keep in the car permanently only needing to recharge it 1-2 times a week depending on usage (I'd perfer not to burn gasoline to make power). If the Acer had ~3 hours maximum battery life, I would likely need to rechard the ACER every time I used it for more than 30 minutes with WiFi. Luckly the Acer is closer to 9 hours at minimum settings and 6 with WiFi on...

I'd buy it to replace the mobile internet functions of my iphone and the portable PC functions of the Acer... and consider it cheap at the price to replace a 500 dollar phone down to a 200 dollar phone and a 400 dollar netbook. Enough to stomach the decrease in computer power (provided it can play MPEG2 and MPEG4 video at native resolution for screen, it would be okay)


"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki