Print 28 comment(s) - last by JediJeb.. on Jan 8 at 11:12 AM

  (Source: Unreality Magazine)

The Canadian government has censored a pro-global warming hoax/parody site by the U.S. group "The Yes Men". In the process Canada also accidentally shut down 4500 other innocent environment sites.  (Source: Sundance Movie Festival)

The Yes Men are Jacque Servin and Igor Vamos, who go by the aliases Andy Bichlbaum and Mike Bonanno (respectively).  (Source: Uniter)
Blame Canada for this one

Canada seems likely a pretty friendly neighbor to the U.S. -- hardly the kinda of place where you would expect censorship to rear its ugly head.  However, that's exactly what happened in an example of the nation trying to silence dissent on the internet.  The story serves as a reminder that censorship is occurring on both sides of the warming debate, not just the skeptics.

According to The Seattle Pi, Canada has taken down two websites by The Yes Men, an activist group that had posted fake press releases posing as the Canadian government to try to push the country to action on global warming.  However, that was just the start of the snowball -- Canada's takedown effort has killed over 4,500 innocent sites as well.

The debacle began when the "Yes Men" pranksters announced that Canada would reduce greenhouse gas emissions in 2020 40 percent from 1990 levels, and 80 percent by the year 2050, reductions roughly in line with those pledged by U.S. President Obama.  The supposed "announcement" came as Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government was instead secretly discussing plans to permit a 165 percent increase in emissions from Alberta's huge oil sands project.

Enraged at the fake statements, Mike Landreville from Environment Canada (Canada's EPA equivalent) wrote German Internet Service Provider (ISP) Serveloft asking them to take down the two sites involved -- "" and "" -- to avoid the "deception" of the Canadian public.

He wrote, "We trust you appreciate the importance of avoiding confusion among the public concerning Canadian governmental affairs and that you will assist us in preventing this hoax from spreading further."

Then he took things a step further, asking the ISP to "make every effort to prevent any further attempts concerning other environment-related domains (enviro, ec-gc, etc.) originating from your servers."

The ISP bowed to the nation's request, and in the process took down 4,500 Canadian environment sites that were innocent bystanders.  Mike Bonanno of "Yes Men" blasted the takedown, stating, "We are sorry to see that the Canadian government will not 'take certain actions' that could help stave off catastrophic climate change and we are sorry to see that they don't care so much for free speech."

The hoax was quite artful.  The "Yes Men" printed press releases on what look like official Canadian government stationary and even included a fake PR shot of someone who looked like Uganda's climate representative standing in front of a replica UN podium, praising Canada's "decision".  Worldwide hundreds of news sites ran with the story, completely fooled. 

The "Yes Men" consist of Jacque Servin, an author of experimental fiction, and Igor Vamos, an associate professor of media arts at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York.  Mr. Servin is infamous in the tech community for placing images of kissing men inside SimCopter while he worked as an employee at Maxis.  The prank was not discovered until after the game's release. 

Since, the pair have become even more famous for the war of hoaxes they wage on those they feel are a destructive influence on society.  Most famously, after Dow Chemical did little to help the victims of a 1984 chemical disaster that left 120,000 in India needing long term care, the "Yes Men" sprang into action.  They released a "Dow" press release claiming that the company was liquidating the involved subsidy to pay for the victims' medical costs.  The storm of negative PR against Dow's subsequent denial of the statement didn't lead to that happening, but it did punish Dow for its inaction, devaluing the company stock by approximately $2B USD.

Ultimately, the pair has yet again succeeded in the Canadian debacle.  First they have brought international media attention to Canada's global warming policy (claiming to support emissions reductions while secretly brokering emissions increases).  Second, the bungled takedown attempt not only draws more attention to the topic, but also to the perils of censorship.  Much as China is perpetually criticized for its own displays of censorship, the Canadian government will invariably be taking some heat over this gratuitous display of internet censorship in coming weeks. 

The sites involved now appear to be up again, with a brief message describing the takedown.  Some of the sites in the ISP block appear to be back to life as well, following the wave of complaints Serveloft received.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I think most of you are missing the point...
By splatter85 on 12/31/2009 1:01:07 PM , Rating: -1
Everyone is talking about how this group may be involved in some illegal activity. What about Canada lying to its people about how it is going to prevent the world from turning into a dust bowl when in fact they are going to accelerate the problem. The worlds climate is in bad shape and reducing emissions within 20-30 years will not help. Developing countries will quadruple the amount of greenhouse emissions within those 10 years, so the US' attempts to cut down will be worthless. We need to figure out technology now to keep things running the way they are, then we need to pass these technologies onto other countries. It needs to be done soon, otherwise your children are going to be left with an unfixable planet with no way off.

By mdogs444 on 12/31/2009 1:36:42 PM , Rating: 3
I think most of you are missing the point...

It needs to be done soon, otherwise your children are going to be left with an unfixable planet with no way off.

We're not missing the point. We just don't buy your fanatical alarmist words. I don't believe there is anything in bad shape, nor do I believe the planet is in peril. In fact, there is nothing to fix in my opinion, because I do not believe that man is responsible for the ever changing climate of the past millions and millions of years. The amount of people who believe the same thing that I do is increasing, whether you wish to accept that or not. The amount of people who see this whole debacle as nothing more than tax schemes, social engineering, and the expansion into a bigger/world government is growing.

RE: I think most of you are missing the point...
By JDHack42 on 12/31/2009 2:23:40 PM , Rating: 2
What about Canada lying to its people...

Oh like no gov't has lied to their people before...

RE: I think most of you are missing the point...
By gmyx on 12/31/2009 4:24:44 PM , Rating: 2
What about Canada lying to its people...
It's the Conservatives: they lie all the time - more than other parties.

By amalcontent on 1/1/2010 2:56:55 AM , Rating: 2
Nice drive-by smearing. Of course, there are no examples given to support your assertion.

An appropriate reply for a horribly written article...

By JediJeb on 1/8/2010 11:12:23 AM , Rating: 1
We need to figure out technology now to keep things running the way they are,

So instead of allowing the Earth to undergo its natural cycles we should instead artifically control the climate so that it best suits our needs?

Sounds like you are completely against nature, because this would be far more invasive to the natural world than what emissions we are producing now. If you look at the entire history of the Earth's climate you will see that the last few thousand years have been pretty optimal for human civilization to grow but are not representative of the high and low extremes that our climate can and will swing to. We should be spending more effort on learning how to adapt to what nature will eventually throw at us than trying to hold the climate into the comfortable norm we think it should be.

We build cities below sea level then complain when we can no longer hold back the sea. We build on the side of cliffs and then complain when the cliff breaks off. We build on the slopes of a volcano and complain when it erupts. We build in a desert and complain there is no water. We build in a swamp and complain about too much water.

I read somewhere that the whole population of the Earth if standing next to each other in 2X2 meter sqares of space would barely cover a few counties of a state in the US. When you think of how small a space that is compared to the entire world, it shows just how little true influence we have on the planet. Don't get me wrong, we should not just pollute with reckless abandon, we should work to minimize our total footprint in the environment. But to think humans are the driving force of the whole environment is nothing but pure arrogance, and to believe we can control it is nothing but a complete power trip our world leaders like to indulge in so they feel important.

"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki