Print 124 comment(s) - last by hashish2020.. on Jan 9 at 3:39 PM

  (Source: Associated Press)
Full-body scanning may be increased after terror attack on U.S. bound flight

With the failed Christmas Day attack fresh on the mind of many Americans, many are calling for increased security in our airports. Security is already increased in the post 9/11 world of air travel, but many Americans still don't feel safe.

Some lawmakers in Congress are calling for increased use of full body scanners that some claim would have detected the non-metallic explosive used by the Nigerian terrorist aboard the Detroit-bound flight on Christmas day. Reuters reports that Dutch authorities have announced that the Schiphol airport in Amsterdam -- where the terrorist boarded the flight bound for America -- will be using full body scanners within three weeks.

In America, President Obama could decree that the deployment of similar scanners in airports around the country be installed. At this point, only 19 airports around the country are using the full-body scanners and the use of the scanners is optional by the traveler. They can opt for pat down instead of using the full-body scanner.

No legislation from Congress is needed for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to deploy full-body scanners into the remainder of the 560 airports around the country that have scheduled airline service. Reuters reports that the terrorist attacks coupled with the call for increased security and additional full-body scanners in our airports is boosting the stock of some companies that build the scanners and related technology.

Whether or not passengers will be forced to go through the full-body scanners remains to be seen. That decision is not up to the TSA. TSA spokesman Greg Soule said, "That [mandatory full-body scanner use] would be a DHS decision. Clearly we would work with DHS, the White House and our congressional partners on security decisions."

Legislation limiting full-body scanning to secondary searches has passed the House of Representatives but has not passed the Senate. The ACLU says that it does not trust the safeguards in place to protect the privacy of passengers subjected to full-body scanning. The ACLU believes that unaltered images showing the shape of a person's body and genitals would still exist.

One ACLU privacy expert said, "If a celebrity goes through a scanner that kind of image could end up on the Internet."

The full body scanners blur the face and genitals of the person in the scanner and only the operator can see the images. The benefit for passengers to using the scanner opposed to a pat down is that the scanner takes 15 to 30 seconds while the pat down takes 3 to 4 minutes.

Chris Calabrese, an attorney with the ACLU, said in May 2009 when talking about using the scanner or a pat down, "A choice between being groped and being stripped, I don't think we should pretend those are the only choices. People shouldn't be humiliated by their government."

There is much research being put into developing better scanners today. Researchers at MIT have developed technology for a new breed of airport scanners that can tell the difference between items in luggage. The new scanner could for instance tell if a pill bottle holds over the counter pain medications or methamphetamines.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Blame the other guy
By hiscross on 12/31/2009 6:53:59 PM , Rating: -1
When a foreign national of a country who is on the State Department / FBI/ CIA watch list boarders a US plane, pays cash for a one-way ticket and is allowed to get on the plane those who are responsible to the well being of US citizens must take the blame. Why, because it is their policy and leadership that is wrong. Both CBP and TSA still don't have commissars for over a year, that is a leadership problem. Since Barry and Janet are liberals and in charge, yes liberalism is part of the problem.

RE: Blame the other guy
By retrospooty on 12/31/2009 8:57:36 PM , Rating: 2
thats a BIT too blamey for me...

Shit happens in this world. You cant foresee everything.

Yes, this guy was on the watch list and that info wasnt communicated to all the right places. It isnt Obama, or Napolitano's job to communicate the list to all, and make sure the right thing is done with it, and it isnt the "commissars" job to do that either. Its low level people that do that, and mistakes happened. They happen when humans do jobs, I am sure you have made mistakes at work too. I know I have. To blame Obama is just stupid. Like him, or not, agree with his policies or dont, but dont put shit that is out of his control on him.

Just curious. Do you blame Bush and conservatism for the 9/11 attacks? He was in charge, and he was warned about Bin Laden. He was also told that something big was being planned and did nothing... I dont personally blame him, because like I said, you cant foresee everything. Hindsight is 20/20.

"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki