Print 124 comment(s) - last by hashish2020.. on Jan 9 at 3:39 PM

  (Source: Associated Press)
Full-body scanning may be increased after terror attack on U.S. bound flight

With the failed Christmas Day attack fresh on the mind of many Americans, many are calling for increased security in our airports. Security is already increased in the post 9/11 world of air travel, but many Americans still don't feel safe.

Some lawmakers in Congress are calling for increased use of full body scanners that some claim would have detected the non-metallic explosive used by the Nigerian terrorist aboard the Detroit-bound flight on Christmas day. Reuters reports that Dutch authorities have announced that the Schiphol airport in Amsterdam -- where the terrorist boarded the flight bound for America -- will be using full body scanners within three weeks.

In America, President Obama could decree that the deployment of similar scanners in airports around the country be installed. At this point, only 19 airports around the country are using the full-body scanners and the use of the scanners is optional by the traveler. They can opt for pat down instead of using the full-body scanner.

No legislation from Congress is needed for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to deploy full-body scanners into the remainder of the 560 airports around the country that have scheduled airline service. Reuters reports that the terrorist attacks coupled with the call for increased security and additional full-body scanners in our airports is boosting the stock of some companies that build the scanners and related technology.

Whether or not passengers will be forced to go through the full-body scanners remains to be seen. That decision is not up to the TSA. TSA spokesman Greg Soule said, "That [mandatory full-body scanner use] would be a DHS decision. Clearly we would work with DHS, the White House and our congressional partners on security decisions."

Legislation limiting full-body scanning to secondary searches has passed the House of Representatives but has not passed the Senate. The ACLU says that it does not trust the safeguards in place to protect the privacy of passengers subjected to full-body scanning. The ACLU believes that unaltered images showing the shape of a person's body and genitals would still exist.

One ACLU privacy expert said, "If a celebrity goes through a scanner that kind of image could end up on the Internet."

The full body scanners blur the face and genitals of the person in the scanner and only the operator can see the images. The benefit for passengers to using the scanner opposed to a pat down is that the scanner takes 15 to 30 seconds while the pat down takes 3 to 4 minutes.

Chris Calabrese, an attorney with the ACLU, said in May 2009 when talking about using the scanner or a pat down, "A choice between being groped and being stripped, I don't think we should pretend those are the only choices. People shouldn't be humiliated by their government."

There is much research being put into developing better scanners today. Researchers at MIT have developed technology for a new breed of airport scanners that can tell the difference between items in luggage. The new scanner could for instance tell if a pill bottle holds over the counter pain medications or methamphetamines.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No Way
By amanojaku on 12/31/2009 1:59:21 PM , Rating: 3
you can live in your politically correct, coddle the terrorists, take away more and more freedom society

I don't need the government telling me I need to wear one

'Live Free or Die" and I firmly believe in that phrase

I choose to live freely and that means resisting things like seat belt laws and full-body scanners, the former being a nanny law and the latter being a massive invasion of my privacy.
But you're in favor of profiling that takes away the freedoms of a group. Hypocrite much?

RE: No Way
By Lerianis on 12/31/2009 3:38:09 PM , Rating: 2
Hit the nail on the head.... the people who are calling for the profiling of Muslims miss the fact that ANYONE can be a terrorist today..... Muslim, Jewish, etc.

It's just that we USED to call them simply MASS MURDERERS... then, they were given a more 'fearful' name in order to hype up the conservacreeps in this country and make them appear to be more of a 'danger' than they actually were!

To be blunt.... I am more worried about a SATELLITE falling out of the sky and hitting me on the head, killing me, than I am of being killed by a terrorist.

It might ALSO help if our country STOPPED pissing off the Muslims by killing and imprisoning without trials their family members. That just creates MORE terrorists by making US appear to be the bad guys.

RE: No Way
By Drexial on 12/31/2009 3:58:05 PM , Rating: 2
I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.

Freedoms are all or nothing, either everyone should have them or no one. Meaning, you are only allowed to take away what you yourself are willing to give up. If you aren't willing to be scanned when walking through a security checkpoint, they you don't have the right to say someone else should.

We spent 7 years listening to someone tell us they attacked because they hated our freedoms, and then spent plenty of time taking freedoms away. Hypocrisy is seems to be the way of the people.

"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki