backtop


Print 124 comment(s) - last by hashish2020.. on Jan 9 at 3:39 PM


  (Source: Associated Press)
Full-body scanning may be increased after terror attack on U.S. bound flight

With the failed Christmas Day attack fresh on the mind of many Americans, many are calling for increased security in our airports. Security is already increased in the post 9/11 world of air travel, but many Americans still don't feel safe.

Some lawmakers in Congress are calling for increased use of full body scanners that some claim would have detected the non-metallic explosive used by the Nigerian terrorist aboard the Detroit-bound flight on Christmas day. Reuters reports that Dutch authorities have announced that the Schiphol airport in Amsterdam -- where the terrorist boarded the flight bound for America -- will be using full body scanners within three weeks.

In America, President Obama could decree that the deployment of similar scanners in airports around the country be installed. At this point, only 19 airports around the country are using the full-body scanners and the use of the scanners is optional by the traveler. They can opt for pat down instead of using the full-body scanner.

No legislation from Congress is needed for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to deploy full-body scanners into the remainder of the 560 airports around the country that have scheduled airline service. Reuters reports that the terrorist attacks coupled with the call for increased security and additional full-body scanners in our airports is boosting the stock of some companies that build the scanners and related technology.

Whether or not passengers will be forced to go through the full-body scanners remains to be seen. That decision is not up to the TSA. TSA spokesman Greg Soule said, "That [mandatory full-body scanner use] would be a DHS decision. Clearly we would work with DHS, the White House and our congressional partners on security decisions."

Legislation limiting full-body scanning to secondary searches has passed the House of Representatives but has not passed the Senate. The ACLU says that it does not trust the safeguards in place to protect the privacy of passengers subjected to full-body scanning. The ACLU believes that unaltered images showing the shape of a person's body and genitals would still exist.

One ACLU privacy expert said, "If a celebrity goes through a scanner that kind of image could end up on the Internet."

The full body scanners blur the face and genitals of the person in the scanner and only the operator can see the images. The benefit for passengers to using the scanner opposed to a pat down is that the scanner takes 15 to 30 seconds while the pat down takes 3 to 4 minutes.

Chris Calabrese, an attorney with the ACLU, said in May 2009 when talking about using the scanner or a pat down, "A choice between being groped and being stripped, I don't think we should pretend those are the only choices. People shouldn't be humiliated by their government."

There is much research being put into developing better scanners today. Researchers at MIT have developed technology for a new breed of airport scanners that can tell the difference between items in luggage. The new scanner could for instance tell if a pill bottle holds over the counter pain medications or methamphetamines.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No Way
By cmdrdredd on 12/31/2009 12:30:23 PM , Rating: -1
To semi-quote Jack Bauer from the show 24...(not an exact quote)

"Yes you're right, it is profiling but it works. So unless you can give me a better idea that works as well get out of the way."

Remember the Ft. Hood shooter. He was Muslim and they refused to ask him questions about his feelings and thoughts when people who knew him were giving warning signs. Why? Because they were afraid to hurt his feelings and the feelings of other Muslims who serve in the military. Problem is, those feelings didn't help any of the people he hurt or killed. So it's either you profile these people, look for common patterns which there is mot definately, or you bend over and take it in the ass. I'll let you guess which one the administration is doing. Pander to the foreigners. It's no wonder there have been MORE terrorist attacks, thwarted or successful in the year 2009 than ANY year since 2001.

What gets me the most is when they arrest this bomber in Detroit and now offer him the same rights that I or any other citizen gets when he or she is doing something illegal. That's utter bullshit. He is NOT a citizen, he does not deserve the protection of our constitution. If we were in his country they'd have cut off our head already. These types of people don't care how nice you are. They want you dead, period.


RE: No Way
By Lerianis on 12/31/2009 3:25:44 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, they do deserve the protections of our constitution. Our constitution specifically says that any foreign nationals in our country or on our soil (our planes would fit into this category) are treated the same as citizens under our Constitutional protections.

As to profiling 'working'.... no, it doesn't. Background checks on all Muslim people coming from known 'terror supporting' states work.... profiling does not.

Just because someone is a Muslim does NOT mean that they are a suicide bomber, and even if you catch one... it is SERIOUSLY unfair to the other 10,000 who were inconvenienced to catch that one person.


"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki