backtop


Print 124 comment(s) - last by hashish2020.. on Jan 9 at 3:39 PM


  (Source: Associated Press)
Full-body scanning may be increased after terror attack on U.S. bound flight

With the failed Christmas Day attack fresh on the mind of many Americans, many are calling for increased security in our airports. Security is already increased in the post 9/11 world of air travel, but many Americans still don't feel safe.

Some lawmakers in Congress are calling for increased use of full body scanners that some claim would have detected the non-metallic explosive used by the Nigerian terrorist aboard the Detroit-bound flight on Christmas day. Reuters reports that Dutch authorities have announced that the Schiphol airport in Amsterdam -- where the terrorist boarded the flight bound for America -- will be using full body scanners within three weeks.

In America, President Obama could decree that the deployment of similar scanners in airports around the country be installed. At this point, only 19 airports around the country are using the full-body scanners and the use of the scanners is optional by the traveler. They can opt for pat down instead of using the full-body scanner.

No legislation from Congress is needed for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to deploy full-body scanners into the remainder of the 560 airports around the country that have scheduled airline service. Reuters reports that the terrorist attacks coupled with the call for increased security and additional full-body scanners in our airports is boosting the stock of some companies that build the scanners and related technology.

Whether or not passengers will be forced to go through the full-body scanners remains to be seen. That decision is not up to the TSA. TSA spokesman Greg Soule said, "That [mandatory full-body scanner use] would be a DHS decision. Clearly we would work with DHS, the White House and our congressional partners on security decisions."

Legislation limiting full-body scanning to secondary searches has passed the House of Representatives but has not passed the Senate. The ACLU says that it does not trust the safeguards in place to protect the privacy of passengers subjected to full-body scanning. The ACLU believes that unaltered images showing the shape of a person's body and genitals would still exist.

One ACLU privacy expert said, "If a celebrity goes through a scanner that kind of image could end up on the Internet."

The full body scanners blur the face and genitals of the person in the scanner and only the operator can see the images. The benefit for passengers to using the scanner opposed to a pat down is that the scanner takes 15 to 30 seconds while the pat down takes 3 to 4 minutes.

Chris Calabrese, an attorney with the ACLU, said in May 2009 when talking about using the scanner or a pat down, "A choice between being groped and being stripped, I don't think we should pretend those are the only choices. People shouldn't be humiliated by their government."

There is much research being put into developing better scanners today. Researchers at MIT have developed technology for a new breed of airport scanners that can tell the difference between items in luggage. The new scanner could for instance tell if a pill bottle holds over the counter pain medications or methamphetamines.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: No Way
By omnicronx on 12/31/2009 11:38:57 AM , Rating: 2
Plain and simple, don't fly..

Heck by your logic, why wear seat belts while driving? I mean you know the risk, but why give up your freedoms and wear something mandated by the government? You could fly through your windsheld, fly 50 feet and hit a lamppost and take 40 minutes to bleed out, but hey as long as it does not infringe on your freedoms!
quote:
The smart solution would be to forget this politically correct crap, stop caving into the useless ACLU, and to start profiling people at security checkpoints. Remember, not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim.
You are a complete and utter moron, every race, religion etc etc has an extremist wing. There are 1.5 BILLION Muslims worldwide, do you really think screening for a few bad apples is justified? Anyone can be a terrorist, and if we start screening those with darker skin, wouldn't you think they would just find Muslims with lighter skin to do the dirty work?

Furthermore its not like this doesn't already happen, those 'random' checks are not so random IMO.


RE: No Way
By L1011 on 12/31/2009 1:35:44 PM , Rating: 2
Well, if I'm a moron, let me do the profiling and you can live in your politically correct, coddle the terrorists, take away more and more freedom society. At least my approach to a problem is more effective. Profiling works.

And seatbelts aren't mandated by the state of NH. I wear one because it's common sense, but I don't need the government telling me I need to wear one. NH's Motto is 'Live Free or Die" and I firmly believe in that phrase. I choose to live freely and that means resisting things like seat belt laws and full-body scanners, the former being a nanny law and the latter being a massive invasion of my privacy. It's strictly principle.

Slightly off topic - Ask Sweden how their mass influx of Muslim "refugees" is going for them. Ask them about the massive violence perpetrated by those lunatics and how ambulance drivers are refusing to go into Muslim-dominated neighborhoods in Sweden. Ask them how many Swedes have been killed by radical muslims. And those people STILL welcome them into their country. It just doesn't make sense.


RE: No Way
By amanojaku on 12/31/2009 1:59:21 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
you can live in your politically correct, coddle the terrorists, take away more and more freedom society

I don't need the government telling me I need to wear one

'Live Free or Die" and I firmly believe in that phrase

I choose to live freely and that means resisting things like seat belt laws and full-body scanners, the former being a nanny law and the latter being a massive invasion of my privacy.
But you're in favor of profiling that takes away the freedoms of a group. Hypocrite much?


RE: No Way
By Lerianis on 12/31/2009 3:38:09 PM , Rating: 2
Hit the nail on the head.... the people who are calling for the profiling of Muslims miss the fact that ANYONE can be a terrorist today..... Muslim, Jewish, etc.

It's just that we USED to call them simply MASS MURDERERS... then, they were given a more 'fearful' name in order to hype up the conservacreeps in this country and make them appear to be more of a 'danger' than they actually were!

To be blunt.... I am more worried about a SATELLITE falling out of the sky and hitting me on the head, killing me, than I am of being killed by a terrorist.

It might ALSO help if our country STOPPED pissing off the Muslims by killing and imprisoning without trials their family members. That just creates MORE terrorists by making US appear to be the bad guys.


RE: No Way
By Drexial on 12/31/2009 3:58:05 PM , Rating: 2
I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.

Freedoms are all or nothing, either everyone should have them or no one. Meaning, you are only allowed to take away what you yourself are willing to give up. If you aren't willing to be scanned when walking through a security checkpoint, they you don't have the right to say someone else should.

We spent 7 years listening to someone tell us they attacked because they hated our freedoms, and then spent plenty of time taking freedoms away. Hypocrisy is seems to be the way of the people.


RE: No Way
By Reclaimer77 on 12/31/09, Rating: 0
RE: No Way
By n0ebert on 1/1/2010 11:11:50 AM , Rating: 4
Please, please, PLEASE stop posting on this site. Between your Fox News level 'facts' and you berating and insulting everyone because you cannot think of a more intelligent quip are making my brain cells beg for mercy.

You do realize that every one of those racist groups in America (such as the KKK) are christian based terrorist groups who bomb churches and other buildings, right? That's only one form of the extremist christian groups out there. Try doing a simple Google search before making a post that it's only Muslim. They are considered EXTREMIST groups by the US Government.


RE: No Way
By thurston on 1/1/2010 1:05:28 PM , Rating: 3
With all the fear-mongering you do, you should be labeled a terrorist.


"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki