backtop


Print 121 comment(s) - last by H24U.. on Jan 30 at 9:07 PM


Hydrogen vehicles aren't too eco-friendly in terms of carbon emissions, according to an in-depth new study.  (Source: Web Wombat)
Study indicates plug-ins feature a lower emissions life than gas vehicles, but hydrogen vehicles feature greater emissions

The hydrogen vehicle movement appears stalled.  The push to use the diatomic gas as auto fuel never exactly made it off the ground due to a lack of infrastructure -- production, distribution, and storage facilities.  However, for a time automakers like Toyota and Honda were pushing ahead with testing of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. 

Even this year, news leaked that GM was considering launching a commercial fuel cell vehicle in 2015, despite lack of support for the hydrogen movement from U.S. President Barack Obama.  However, of late, the big automakers like Toyota and Honda have backed off the effort to push hydrogen vehicles onto the market.

A new study might put another road block in front of the prospect of a near term commercial hydrogen vehicle release, while giving the plug-in vehicle movement a nice boost.  The study was authored by Ryan McCarthy at the University of California, Davis and published in the Journal of Power Sources. The ground-breaking study, entitled "Determining marginal electricity for near-term plug-in and fuel cell vehicle demands in California: Impacts on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions", examines the emissions impact of hydrogen and plug-in vehicles versus their gas counterparts.

Lowering carbon emissions to fight warming, along with high fuel prices and global-political instability, has been a key driving factor for the adoption of hybrids and alternative fuels.  The new study, though, judged hydrogen vehicles to be an utter failure at that objective, in their current state.  The study concluded, "All of the pathways except for [fuel cell vehicles] using hydrogen from electrolysis reduce [greenhouse gas] emissions compared to ICEs and [hybrid electric vehicles]."

It doesn't dissuade further research into hydrogen vehicles; it simply indicates they are unlikely to be ready for showtime anytime soon.  It points out that steam methane reforming is a promising emerging method of hydrogen production that may one day allow hydrogen driven vehicles to actually live up to their emissions promises.

In the near term, the study finds that plug-in electric vehicles are the best option in terms of lowering carbon emissions.  Despite using electricity mostly generated by "relatively inefficient steam- and combustion-turbine plants" the well-to-wheel carbon impact of EVs is still significantly lower than hybrids.

While by no means the definitive study on the topic, the new work does much to fill in the gap in knowledge about what exactly the true impact of green vehicles are.  While the topic of on-the-road emissions has been well researched, there's been much less progress in examining the full lifetime impact of vehicles.  Now, that lifecycle has been examined in depth and EV advocates can put another feather in their caps, while hydrogen advocates are once again handed another setback.

The study may play a crucial role in forming the policy of California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard, an effort to reduce the carbon impact of transportation.  And given that President Barack Obama's Environmental Protection Agency has embraced California's emissions policy, the new study could have a profound impact on the course of regulations and the auto market nationally, as well.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I might care
By quiksilvr on 1/1/2010 5:42:25 PM , Rating: 5
Damn the whole Global Warming nonsense and just look at the logical reasoning:

1) Pollution is bad for your health.
2) Cutting down pollution is good for us.

If people just focused more on the fact that spewing out pollution is bad for us instead of the whole "The ice caps this" and "The polar bears that", we would waste less time arguing about it and more time just making cleaner vehicles.

In my opinion, we should use hemp oil as bio-diesel (hemp does not contain THC like marijuana and will not make you high if burned). It grows easily, the oil has been proven to work and will really help push clean diesel in this country.


RE: I might care
By BansheeX on 1/2/2010 7:45:41 AM , Rating: 4
It's not as simple as saying "pollution is bad, therefore let's not pollute". People have always weighed the costs of a technology against its benefits before embracing it. Horses crap all over the place, but people used them for centuries as their chief method of transport. A lot of earlier cars and coal plants were quite dirty in their emissions: does that mean people shouldn't have used them? We needed those dirty, immature technologies or we would have never advanced to the point of improving or discovering cleaner ones.

The sad thing is that we've completely underappreciated the significance of discovering fission. Electric cars have a big carbon footprint BECAUSE WE DO NOT UTILIZE OUR KNOWLEDGE. It's not because of any legitimate cost or safety concern that we are only 25% nuclear power, it's because of mass ignorance and fear.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki