U.S. FTC Slams Intel With Antitrust Suit
December 16, 2009 11:40 AM
comment(s) - last by
FTC accuses Intel of numerous violations, including writing software to sabotage its competitors' hardware
Intel holds a
in the computer industry, with over 79.1 percent market share in the microprocessor market, according to
from the summer (these reports included by x86 architecture microprocessors as well as alternatives like ARM). In May 2009 the European Union's antitrust regulators
fined the chipmaker $1.45B USD
-- about a fourth of the company's 2008 net income ($5.292B USD) -- for allegedly using discounts and OEM payoffs to push its smaller competitor Advanced Micro Devices out of the market. That ruling is currently
In the U.S. the Federal Trade Commission has investigated similar claims. The State of New York has
against the Santa Clara, Calif.-based company for antitrust violations, but thus far no federal litigation had been filed. That all changed today with the FTC
, citing numerous antitrust violations.
The landmark case comes on the heels of
Intel's $1.25B USD settlement
with AMD over similar claims. Under that agreement AMD agreed to drop all pending and present litigation against its rival. According to the FTC's lawsuit filing, Intel is depriving customers of free choice and is stifling the progress of the computer industry. The filing says that Intel employed a carrot-and-stick sort of approach, using both threats and rewards to keep OEMs from using its competitors' products. Reportedly Intel used such targets on Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., and IBM Corp.
One of the more interesting aspects of the case is that the FTC claims to have evidence that Intel wrote compiler software (Intel makes one of the more commonly used commercial C++ code compilers, the Intel C++ Compiler) to sabotage the performance of its competitors' CPUs. Little is known about this allegation at this point.
Richard Feinstein, director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, says Intel's violations are blatant and alarming. He states, "Intel has engaged in a deliberate campaign to hamstring competitive threats to its monopoly. It's been running roughshod over the principles of fair play and the laws protecting competition on the merits. The Commission's action today seeks to remedy the damage that Intel has done to competition, innovation, and, ultimately, the American consumer."
The FTC case looks to prevent Intel from employing "threats, bundled prices, or other offers to encourage exclusive deals, hamper competition, or unfairly manipulate the prices of its" CPUs.
Intel was recently
fined $25M USD
by the South Korean government for antitrust violations. The FTC's investigation of Intel was
first announced officially in June 2008
. Under the more pro-antitrust Obama administration the investigation has
pushed ahead aggressively
and now looks to place new fines or restrictions on the chipmaker.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: How does this help the consumer?
12/16/2009 1:16:18 PM
So would ending the war in Afghanistan but as I recall were sending 30k more troops.
RE: How does this help the consumer?
12/16/2009 1:53:10 PM
Another fine idea.
Others savings include:
Drastically reduce military expenditures in general
Eliminate all payments from the Social Security fund that are unrelated to SS. Like all those disability payments to people who can actually work for a living.
Reduce Dept of Education funding drastically.
No highway spending outside of excise taxes.
To add more revenue:
Reinstate the Estate (Death) Tax with a $3M cutoff (I will be paying this myself at sometime in the future)
Tax things that we import too much of. (like oil)
Disallow the deduction of expenses/investments make by companies outside of the US. (currently a US business gets a tax write-off for building a factory in China, but they never pay taxes on the profits generated there. The same factory built here would pay much higher taxes. And you wonder why jobs are leaving? The government is PAYING THEM TO.)
"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer
Intel, AMD Settle Antitrust Disputes, Intel to Pay AMD $1.25 Billion
November 12, 2009, 9:34 AM
Intel Slapped with Antitrust Lawsuit by NY Attorney General
November 4, 2009, 12:25 PM
Intel Appeals Massive $1.45B EU Fine
July 22, 2009, 12:08 PM
European Commission Fines Intel $1.45B
May 13, 2009, 9:04 AM
Intel Profits Increase 25%, Reports Great Quarterly Sales
July 16, 2008, 12:02 PM
3/7/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
March 7, 2014, 10:19 AM
Quick Note: OCZ Z-Drive 4500 PCIe SSD Gets Official
March 4, 2014, 9:53 AM
3/4/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
March 4, 2014, 8:45 AM
2/27/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 27, 2014, 11:54 AM
2/26/2014 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 26, 2014, 10:28 AM
AVADirect Unleashes High-End Supermicro, Tyan GPU Servers
February 7, 2014, 12:35 PM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Bitcoin King: Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès' History of Arrests, Firings
March 5, 2014, 9:05 AM
Windows 8.1 Update 1 Leaked Early
March 7, 2014, 9:30 AM
Apple Won't Let UK Sons Unlock Their Deceased Mother's iPad
March 6, 2014, 12:44 PM
Lt. Gen. Davis Says Next Gen USAF Bomber Will "Of Course" Surpass $550M/Unit
March 6, 2014, 9:45 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information