Print 38 comment(s) - last by fox12789.. on Dec 30 at 9:33 AM

The XO-3 tablet concept promises a different vision of computing  (Source: OLPC)
Even poor kids need faster computing

Over the last five years, the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) project has sought to develop and distribute a low-cost and rugged computer to children around the world in a bid to raise global standards of living. The non-profit organization successfully developed the XO-1, and has distributed over 1.4 million of the netbooks for less than $200 each.

“The first version of OLPC’s child-centric laptop, the XO, is a revolution in low-cost, low-power computing. The XO has been distributed to more than 1.4 million children in 35 countries and in 25 languages,” said Nicholas Negroponte, the founder and Chairman of One Laptop per Child.

Mass production of the XO-1 first started in November 2007. Computer technology has made significant advances over the last two years, and the XO-1 is getting long in the tooth. The XO-1 features an AMD Geode CPU running at 433MHz, 256MB of DDR DRAM, and 1GB of SLC NAND flash memory for storage. A 7.5-inch screen with a 1200x900 resolution is used. Wireless networking is enabled by a chip from Marvell, while a built-in camera, microphone, and speakers add functionality. A variety of battery choices are available. The XO-1 only uses 2W to run.

The OLPC project will introduce a new XO-1.5 in January 2010 using the same basic design. However, it will drop AMD in favor of a VIA C7-M Ultra Low Voltage CPU which will double operating speed. DRAM will be increased to 1GB, while 4GB of flash memory will be the standard, with an option for 8GB. It will be capable of running Windows and Linux, and is targeted for a $200 price.

Two other designs have been added to the OLPC roadmap. The XO-1.75 is currently targeted for the $150 mark and an early 2011 launch. The design will be updated, with rubber-bumpers on the outside for added shock protection. A new 8.9-inch touch-sensitive display will be used. The project is working with Marvell on integrating a new ARM processor that will double speeds while cutting power consumption by 75%. This ARM-based system will complement the x86-based XO-1.5, which will continue to remain in production to give deployments a choice of processor platform.

The XO-3.0 is being developed for 2012 at a target price of less than $100. It will feature a new tablet design using a single sheet of flexible plastic, and will supposedly be unbreakable. The XO 3.0 will leapfrog the XO-2.0, a concept approach that the OLPC project decide not to pursue.

“To fulfill our mission of reaching 500 million children in all remote corners of the planet, OLPC will continue to innovate in design and performance. Because we are a non-profit, we hope that industry will copy us,” Negroponte added.

The XO-1 helped to establish that low-cost netbooks could be functional and affordable, and helped push Intel into developing the Atom. Former OLPC CTO Mary Lou Jepsen left the project to form Pixel Qi, a fabless firm which designs and and markets energy-saving screens that are readable in daylight. There is no word yet on which OLPC netbooks will use the technology, but Pixel Qi just entered mass production of its first 10.1 screens for use with new Pine Trail netbooks, and its future screens  are rumored to be used in Apple's tablet computer.

Walter Bender's Sugar interface has also been spun off. Originally designed for the OLPC project,  it is now being developed by Sugar Labs and is available for free under a GNU General Public License.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why not everyone?
By Drag0nFire on 12/23/2009 2:27:24 PM , Rating: 2
If you want one for your kid, buy one. The point is the dirt farmer can't afford it for his kids, whereas you can.

RE: Why not everyone?
By Homerboy on 12/24/2009 12:37:25 AM , Rating: 5
No I can't afford it. Nor can 8%+ of America that is unemployed.

RE: Why not everyone?
By StevoLincolnite on 12/24/2009 3:39:50 AM , Rating: 2
Even some people who ARE employed would still be un-able to afford it, simply because of debt or low wages, and general living expenses, I think that number of 8% might be higher than we might actually expect.

RE: Why not everyone?
By inperfectdarkness on 12/24/2009 7:50:44 AM , Rating: 1
yet another program to give aid to 3rd world countries while our own country is in massive debt?


RE: Why not everyone?
By lagitup on 12/24/2009 12:47:16 PM , Rating: 2
Shut up.

This isn't costing you your tax dollars, your republic congressmen aren't being bought off. Go whine somewhere else.

RE: Why not everyone?
By LRonaldHubbs on 12/24/2009 1:06:28 PM , Rating: 2

RE: Why not everyone?
By albus on 12/24/2009 6:25:15 AM , Rating: 2
It is cheaper than the computer you are typing this on.

If you purchased this computer, you can surely afford the OLPC.

RE: Why not everyone?
By chick0n on 12/24/2009 11:01:38 AM , Rating: 2
what if Im typing this in a public library ?

I can't afford one. Where is my OLPC?

RE: Why not everyone?
By albus on 12/24/2009 12:34:51 PM , Rating: 2
You can afford to live in a first world country. You directly/indirectly pay for all your amenities. The infrastructure, roadways, utilities are funded by you. Yes, that includes the internet access in public libraries.

Public libraries are a rarity in poor countries. There is no "free" internet access. Internet cafes can be found in cities. But the rates are too high for the poor student who can barely afford to buy textbooks. In villages, you would be lucky to find anyone with a computer.

For them, it is a choice between sending their children to school or sending them off to earn bread for the family. Governments encourage the people by providing free meals, textbooks & uniforms.

RE: Why not everyone?
By lagitup on 12/24/2009 12:39:26 PM , Rating: 2
Where are my fries with that?

RE: Why not everyone?
By jdietz on 12/27/2009 12:04:28 PM , Rating: 2
You cannot afford internet access if you cannot afford OLPC.
Have fun at McDonalds.

RE: Why not everyone?
By LRonaldHubbs on 12/24/2009 1:06:08 PM , Rating: 2

RE: Why not everyone?
By elgueroloco on 12/24/2009 5:28:02 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, I think the point he was making is that adopting these devices with e-books would cost schools significantly less than using paper textbooks and also have way less environmental impact, and that schools should therefore adopt them. This would save the tax payers money and improve quality of education for kids.

I happen to agree. I think it's a good idea. The only big hitch would be in getting the crooked publishers of textbooks to agree to sell mass e-book licenses for an actually reasonable price, and also not to make new editions every year that mostly just re-word or re-order what's already in the book but then charge you for a whole new book (though I think that is much more of a problem in college than in K-12).

"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki