Print 18 comment(s) - last by Blackraven.. on Apr 12 at 11:54 AM

TDK beats all others to the finish line in shipping Blu-ray media

TDK Corporation announced today that it has begun shipping Blu-ray recordable media to retailers across the United States. The first wave of media will include 25GB BD-R (recordable) and BD-RE (rewritable) media.

This media is single-layered 25GB capacity.  TDK plans to ship dual layer media at 25GB per layer later this year as Blu-ray drives and set top recorders start becoming available. According to the press release, TDK's Blu-ray discs are manufactured at its Chikumagawa Techno Factory in Japan. The manufacturing process is much very different compared to that of CDs and DVDs.  TDK claims:

The high-sensitivity inorganic recording material utilized by TDK for the write-once type BD-R is completely different than the recording materials used for CD or DVD. TDK Blu-ray Discs’ inorganic material is impervious to light, making the discs exceptionally well suited for archiving data. Composed of copper and silicon, TDK’s exclusive CuSi recording material delivers remarkable, long-lasting performance. The recording material enables fast recording and playback speeds and also makes it possible to realize massive capacities through multi-layering.

Additionally, TDK has included its hard coating formulation called DURABIS for added protection to the media. Pricing on the media has also been released for the BD-R and BD-RE at $19.99 and $24.99 respectively. Later this year, TDK will ship the 50GB media at $47.99 for the BD-R media and $59.99 for the BD-RE media.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: $1/GB!!
By Visual on 4/11/2006 12:02:20 AM , Rating: 1
I'm a blu-ray "fan" you might say. I can't wait to have my drive already. And indeed the main reason I like it is not what it'd do for HD movies, but for computer storage.

Believe it or not, DL DVDs are still near impossible to find where I live, and the prices are ridiculous. And those are write-once discs, I'm not even sure if there'd be a RW DL disc ever.

The HD-DVD standard was quite funny to keep track on as it evolved - their printed, R and RW discs each use completely separate specs, resulting in a mess that just screams "oversight" or "patch-up job" - attempting to increase capacity so as to counter BD's advantage, their RW format will be 20GB singlelayer and they're still working on duallayer which will have a 32GB capacity, their R format is still 15gb and will ONLY be singlelayer with the current spec (but the R specs are the oldest of the three so there are hopes for an update here) and for their printed media they came up with the genious "solution" of having dual-sided DL discs in order to fight BD (and for a while even advertised some dual-sided "hybrid" discs :/) Then they came to their senses and tried increasing layers on a single side, but the max that was possible was three layers, and those went deeper than the middle of the disc so dualsided became impossible... anyway, how do you fancy a format with 15/30/45GB printed media, only 15gb R media and 20/32GB RW media? Well ok, I agree, those numbers could've been even more random-looking, so it's not all bad. Just hope there don't turn out to be tons of incompatibilities with the RW discs and cheap players.

RW discs from the get-go instead of a "strapon" to the specs is just one of the reasons I'm all for Blu-ray here. And I really like the initial pricing, I must add, atleast for RW discs.

OFFTOPIC/to the site admins: For heaven's sake, fix your site at last, please. I'm sick of "Oops!"es every time I try anything after a brief interval of inactivity.

RE: $1/GB!!
By Spoonbender on 4/11/2006 5:00:09 AM , Rating: 2
Well, some of us just use harddrives for computer storage. Cheaper, faster, more reliable and takes up less space. ;)

RE: $1/GB!!
By IsDanReally on 4/11/2006 10:18:54 AM , Rating: 2
Hard drives being more reliable is questionable. My most recent set of large hard drives have all three failed within a year. Luckily, with RAID what you say is correct.

RE: $1/GB!!
By Visual on 4/11/2006 11:16:04 AM , Rating: 2
harddrives arent compact and portable enough. i thought it was pretty clear removable storage is what i had in mind.
and no, they aren't cheaper too - a 20gb harddisk these days will cost you probably more than $40 :p they do get cheap in the bulk capacities ofcourse, but im pretty sure by the time BD gets to 4 or 8 layers, the format will be serious competition to HDDs... prices will fall. oh and eventually it will be faster than HDDs for sure - tricks like reading all layers at once, kinda raid stripping with layers instead of separate drives :p still only needs one optical head too.

as to the reliability - only time will show, we'll have to wait and see. hddvd certainly doesn't offer much progress above dvds, but i do have high expectations of tdk's BD coating (fanboyinsh again, i know).

oh and what do you mean "takes up less space" ? doesn't seem so to me

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki