backtop


Print 24 comment(s) - last by Omega215D.. on Dec 2 at 11:50 PM

The GE, Comcast deal could be done as early as Thursday

General Electric and Comcast have worked out a deal in which Comcast will receive a majority stake of the NBC Universal broadcasting company once Vivendi signs away its 20% stake.

NBC could be a joint operation between GE and Comcast for a few years, and then GE is expected to leave the company behind in 2012 or 2013.  NBC Universal currently includes Universal Pictures movie studios, cable channels USA, Syfy, Bravo, and the Universal Studios theme parks.

GE now controls 80% of the company, with an estimated value of $30 billion -- Comcast will receive the company and its $9 billion debt, while Comcast is expected to include its own cash contribution.  When the deal is completed, Comcast will become one of the largest entertainment companies in the world, and may be better suited to battle The Walt Disney Co.

GE has manufactured a wide range of industrial products ranging from dishwashers and light bulbs to jet engines, but its interest in NBC has always been rather intriguing.  The company didn't want to spin off NBC, but has struggled greatly due to the global economy, while spinning off other businesses.

In the future, GE plans to attempt to rejuvenate its manufacturing branches, while leaving other industries alone, analysts believe.

The Federal Communications Commission must now take a look at the deal -- which could take up to one year to complete -- though the companies involved do not expect any major problems from the federal government.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: So on the surface...
By Spivonious on 12/2/2009 9:02:57 AM , Rating: 2
I don't see how anti-trust laws come into play. Could you explain that a bit more? Points 1 and 3 are perfectly legal. A company can do what it wants to as long it's not illegal. Implementing bandwidth caps and changing Hulu to be subscription-based are not illegal. As far as net neutrality, there are no laws on that yet, so we'll have to wait and see (and of course contact your representative/senator to make sure your opinion is heard).

They do have a monopoly for cable TV service in their areas. That monopoly is government-mandated.


RE: So on the surface...
By acortez on 12/2/2009 9:37:26 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
They do have a monopoly for cable TV service in their areas. That monopoly is government-mandated.


Then what are FiOS and Sat?


RE: So on the surface...
By Spivonious on 12/2/2009 9:42:03 AM , Rating: 2
They're not cable TV providers?


RE: So on the surface...
By cplusplus on 12/2/2009 4:25:42 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, they are. U-Verse and DirecTV/Dish Network, anyone?


"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki