Print 82 comment(s) - last by macthemechanic.. on Nov 28 at 12:44 AM

Some of the new iMacs Apple shipped won't boot, while others have cracked screens.
"It Just Works" -- Apple, Inc.

Apple has certainly had its share of quality issues on its high-end OS-X-sporting notebooks and PCs.  From hard drive (SATA) issues to display issues, Apple has been unable to remedy many of these issues despite repeated firmware updates and in some cases has left those affected to deal with the mess on their own.  To add a bit of irony to such problems, Apple is infamous for its slogan "it just works", which it has used to poke fun at its "buggy" PC competitors.

Now those ordering the company's new iMacs are experiencing a wealth of new problems.  Customers ordering the Intel Core i7 Nehalem-powered machines are finding their Macintosh dream machines coming with a unsightly cracked screens [Source: Apple Support Forums].  Others are finding that their new unit simply won't boot.  Among those with the latter problem are editors at Engadget, who received a non-booting unit for their review.

The bottom-left corner is almost unanimously the site of the screen cracking, so Apple may have a quality control issue with its shipping packaging, some have speculated.  On Apple's support forums, a user "scopro" describes, "There's no apparent damage to the styrofoam or box so it looks like that's a weak spot in the screen and how they are being packed in the boxes.  Hopefully Apple will improve their packaging for these larger iMacs as it may take until Dec. 7 for my replacement to arrive."

As the comment implied, Apple is shipping replacement units and hopefully most of these will arrive by Christmas -- considering that many are likely gifts.  Unfortunately for those looking to get an i7 iMac, they have to take their chances and order online, as the 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 860 processor is offered as a $200 built-to-order option (total price is $2199) on the new 27" iMac, and thus is not available at Apple stores.  A 2.66 GHz Core i5 750 27" iMac is also available online for $1999.

The new iMacs -- if they're not non-booting or otherwise marred -- pack some nice improvements.  The most significant improvement is obviously the new Intel Core i7 processor, which sports 8 MB of L3 cache and an improved design.  The new iMac also ships with a wireless keyboard and the new Magic Mouse.  It can support up to 16 GB of memory.  The new machines come with a large and attractive (if not cracked) 16:9 screen with a 2560x1440 pixel resolution.  They also ship with Apple's new operating system, Snow Leopard, and are ready for Windows 7 (via Bootcamp) to help Mac owners get their gaming fix (for the small crowd of Mac owners that are also PC gamers).

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Disappointed
By macthemechanic on 11/25/2009 12:41:36 AM , Rating: -1
For all the naysayers out there. I dare you to just try one for one month. You won't want to go back to Windows. The 27 inch quad core iMac is absolutely the most impressive desktop ever built. Mine arrived 3 days after leaving the distribution site, in perfect condition. It works like the most amazing combination of a flatscreen TV and computer system. It did, in face, just work. The first time it came up, the screen was so bright, I almost reached for my sunglasses. After dimming the screen just a bit, I began to see how really, really fast this computer really was compared to my other computers (Windows and Macs). Very happy with my purchase. On the norm, when I buy a computer, I usually keep my WinTel computer about 2 years and then upgrade. I tend to keep my Macs around for 6 years or longer without feeling the need to upgrade. They run just as fast year after year. In fact, the only reason I upgraded from my dual 2.5 Ghz G5 was to be able to run Apple's Logic Studio 9, which only runs on Intel processors. The G5 is now a 3Tb media server and running flawlessly for perhaps another 6 years. Consider these Macs like Volvos or Mercedes. They last. Try one for a month, if you don't like it, resell it on EBay and get your money back. They trade in nicely too on the resale market.

RE: Disappointed
By SiliconAddict on 11/25/2009 3:05:13 AM , Rating: 5
One month? I tried one for 3 years. I will never go Apple. worse experience I've ever had. The first damn week I found a way to KP tiger consistently. When I migrated my picts over there were prob about a couple thousand thumbnail files in folders in the dir. So I searched for them in spotlight and dragged them to the recycle bin. Well by the time it got to the bottom of the list it had started populating items in the recycle bin into spotlight and BAM. Infinite loop and KP. That is only one of dozens of BS things that happened in OS X. No one can explain to this day why when I shut down OS X it would only shut down the GUI and take me to the command line. from there I would need to hit the power button to turn it off. Or my personal fav. I did an update to Leopard last October and for some reason the update went bad. Couldn't start up WIFI anymore. Took it into the Apple store and was told yah just reinstall the OS. We'll ignore the fact that in Windows I can uninstall the update and try again, or do a quick system restore. remind me again who's OS is more advanced?
We won't even talk about the 7 times I took my MBP in for repairs. 4 on the first MBP, then they replaced it with a new one and 3 more on the new one. Before the warranty was up I sold the thing and got myself a new Dell. Been happily running Win 7 since January.
I will never again buy into Apple PR campaign. Just works my ass. Maybe it works...just like a rectal examination. Doesn't mean I want one anytime soon.

RE: Disappointed
By macthemechanic on 11/25/2009 3:27:02 PM , Rating: 1
I'm sorry you had a bad experience lasting 3 years. It does appear like you basically didn't know how to do various tasks in OS X. I also hated receiving the answer to re-install the OS, as I've gotten that from technical people for both Windows, OS X and Linux over the years. What they are really telling you is that they either don't know or don't have the time to troubleshoot it. If you had paid support, you should demand they fix it. Simply re-installing any OS as the first response is ridiculous.

I too have thousands and thousands of family photos and regularly manage them on my OS X based computer. From what you describe, there sounds like several things that may have happened. Spotlight is similar to Microsoft's Search engine. Each must index in the background. With either OS, you must be patient and not assume it is a hung task when the computer is busy. You can verify this in Windows easily, and just as easy in OS using the Activity Monitor (similar to Task Manager).

I have to say though that some of the problems you described are due to impatience and a basic lack of understanding of how to run the system. A point is that somehow you managed to boot OS X into a mode that runs like Linux that allows the GUI to be shut down. This is usually used for diagnostic purposes and can quite easily be disengaged if you prefer. The norm is to just press the power on button and it automatically boots into the Gui, much like Windows.

RE: Disappointed
By Gary Oak on 11/25/2009 5:58:08 PM , Rating: 3
Apparently you missed a few things in his post. he said the machine KP'd on him. KP means Kernel panic, meaning the machine didnt "hang" or "pause" it had a fatal error. KP is basically the same as the blue screen of death.

If fixing the GUI issue was really that simple, I'm sure he would have figured it out, and not be able to say "No one can explain to this day why when I shut down OS X it would only shut down the GUI and take me to the command line."

RE: Disappointed
By macthemechanic on 11/28/2009 12:44:08 AM , Rating: 1
No, I got that he was having problems with the machine. It would appear that there has been some Darwin (Unix) changes happening on his machine. The lockups can be memory related (just like in Windows), or System tampering. I suspect something or someone may have been making changes to files incorrectly. The shutdown to command line option sounds like the machine was booting into verbose mode (much like Linux options). This can be done two ways, either holding Command V or setting it via command line. Note this link:

I have run Windows systems since Windows first came out in the 80s. I've been running Macs at home and at work since 2000. The only time I've seen what was described was either memory problems, or some errant install program from a untested download from the Internet. I had a firewall program from a normally trusted vendor, go awry once and change ownership on several System files, while attempting to replace others. It didn't go well. The machine locked up. After looking through the logs, the offending software was easily found and removed. The vendor was notified. I'm sorry for this guys problems with his machine. From his writings, it sounds like he's more suited to staying Windows as he seems comfortable and more knowledgeable with it.


RE: Disappointed
By damianrobertjones on 11/25/2009 5:32:07 AM , Rating: 1
I dare you to actually open your mind. Neither windows or osx are perfect and there's only so many ways you can open a picture, write a letter and of course, browse the web.

I choose to spend my money and when I do, I usually try to find something that's suitable and worth the cash. For instance, I decided to purchase a £120 HP DX2400, slapped in a Q9650 with silly sized heatsink and fan, attached a 120m fan to the side of the case, along with a 9800 GX2 and Western Digital Black 32mb cached 7200rpm drive. Ohh, it's fast, so very fast. Many wouldn't bother but it was runs like a dream first time, every time. Oh it’s so amazing, mmmm, ohh yeah, ugghh.

Windows 'is' a versatile operating system, running on so many machines and configurations that apple can only DREAM of such things. Please stay with apple, they deserve you. (A lot of mac converts are people that trashed their machines time after time due to malware, installed rubbish and of course... infections caused due to trying to find... pron!)

I also dare you to write using paragraphs

RE: Disappointed
By damianrobertjones on 11/25/2009 5:34:07 AM , Rating: 2
P.s. There's nothing high class about having the same internal components as standard pcs. You may have a ferrari kit for an MR2 Turbo, but at the end of the day, it's still the same under all the 'shiny bits'

RE: Disappointed
By Nik00117 on 11/25/2009 7:22:39 AM , Rating: 2
But it's still pretty.

This is actually how MAC is going keep their reliability ratings up, if we can't turn it on we can't test it can we?

RE: Disappointed
By damianrobertjones on 11/25/2009 8:09:39 AM , Rating: 2

RE: Disappointed
By RjBass on 11/25/2009 9:49:00 AM , Rating: 3
I don't know about pretty.

Just two days ago I was walking around Logan Int Airport and was looking at all the laptops people were using. I saw a lot of Macs, and while that design may have been pretty for a few years, it looks rather old and tired now. All the Macs looked exactly the same, it was as if I was looking at a bunch of sheep, as I couldn't tell the difference between any of them simply by their shell.

I remember once, years ago, somebody gave Dell a hard time, said Dell computers all look the same, boring and black. Well to me, Apple is falling into the same rut. They all look the same boring white. No various colors, no various keyboard options, just boring white.

OS X may be a really nice OS, and Mac's may have nice hardware under the hood, but I still like options.

RE: Disappointed
By Whaaambulance on 11/25/2009 10:56:46 AM , Rating: 2
Your wall of text has been noted.


RE: Disappointed
By nikon133 on 11/25/2009 4:30:44 PM , Rating: 2
Last couple of times I have checked, Mercedes, BMW, Volvo... were never among top 10 in reliability polls. Those seats were pretty much reserved for likes of Toyota, Subaru, Lexus... maybe an odd European like VW.

One can argue that, with all extras, luxury cars have more things that can go wrong. True. But problem I have with Apples is - they don't have any extras relative to rest of the industry, they are just nice, custom bodyworks with standard Toyota engines, gearboxes, suspensions... sort of speak.

27" Mac has nice processing performance, but graphics are let-down for such a big screen. I doubt 4850 can run many (if any) recent 3D game in screen's native resolution. I consider that bad in any case, and even worst for that price. Add to that what seems to be very common - screen and boot problems...quite a disaster.

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki