Print 87 comment(s) - last by Cache.. on Nov 29 at 11:19 PM

Microsoft's bricking of modified Xbox 360 consoles may bring the company its latest class action suit. Microsoft tells the over 1 million banned customers to buy a new Xbox 360 or deal with their crippled unit.
Legal firm is looking for banned Xbox owners to participate in suit

Gamers are really into tweaking their gear for fun and to achieve the best performance during gameplay. PC gamers overclock their hardware to get more performance for less money and console gamers have modded their Xbox 360 consoles for many reasons (some for innocent reasons, some for nefarious reasons).

Microsoft appears to feel that the only reason to mod an Xbox 360 is to allow the console to play pirated download software. A law firm based in Texas that specializes in IP has launched a new website to gather Xbox 360 users who have been banned for modding their consoles. The main goal of the firm is to find out whether there are enough console owners that were banned to start a class action suit against Microsoft.

The law firm wrote on its website, "Microsoft has chosen to use one of the most indiscriminate "weapons" in its arsenal in an effort to combat piracy -- as a result, use of this "weapon" has resulted in a great deal of collateral damage -- many people were affected who had nothing to do with piracy."

According to the law firm, AbingtonIP, the bans were strategically timed so that they didn’t interfere with the sales and new Xbox Live registrations that were seen around the launch of HALO ODST and the recent launch of Modern Warfare 2. AbingtonIP states that had the bans happened before the launch of these games the profits reaped by Microsoft would have been diminished.

So far the Xbox 360 ban has led to more than 1 million consoles being banned from the network with the official recourse for the banned players being to buy a new console and not mod it this time around. A potential fix for banned consoles that doesn't involve buying a new Xbox 360 surfaced. The workaround is called iXtreme LT and the goal of the workaround is to provide a minimum amount of security checks and make the firmware as close to stock as possible to avoid detection and the resulting ban.

The fix arrived but was rather complex and required that the Xbox 360 not have been updated or the player to have access to the CPU key of the console. DailyTech has also spoke with an attorney -- Jeffrey Johnson -- about the banning of Xbox 360 console form the Xbox Live network.

Microsoft's official statement on the banning of certain consoles reads, "Our commitment to combat piracy and support safer and more secure gameplay for the more than 20 million members of our Xbox Live community remains a top priority,” he wrote. “All consumers should know that piracy is illegal, and that modifying their Xbox 360 console to play pirated discs, violates the Xbox Live terms of use, will void their warranty and result in a ban from Xbox Live."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Bunch o' babies
By klstay on 11/23/2009 10:31:08 AM , Rating: 5
A) You agreed to the EULA before getting on line. (No on held a gun to your head.)

B) You chose to break the EULA. (No one held a gun to your head.)

C) Microsoft exercises their right as outlined in the EULA you agreed to, and now you want a free diaper change?!? (Someone needs to hold a gun to your broken head, and pull the trigger...)


RE: Bunch o' babies
By Brainonska511 on 11/23/2009 10:46:43 AM , Rating: 5
Not all things in a EULA are legally enforceable.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By bighairycamel on 11/23/2009 11:28:43 AM , Rating: 5
What about this one stands out as illegal? You agree to terms and conditions which require you to play with an unmodded console on MICROSOFT's personally owned Live servers. Corrupting data was a kick below the belt, but when talking specifically about the banning action there really is no argument. Seems pretty open/shut if you ask me.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By AyashiKaibutsu on 11/23/2009 11:36:02 AM , Rating: 5
There's lots of things companies would like to be enforcable that they put in all sorts of shrinkwrap/pizza box licenses, but in a court room very few of those things actually are. I'm no law expert, but I'd guess the case could go either way.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By steven975 on 11/23/2009 12:56:35 PM , Rating: 4
Those issues are usually concerning software where there is a separate license agreement (usually for a large customer). Often the "click-wrap" agreements are still there, but the enterprise agreement usually is enforced, even though the "click-wrap" was agreed to later in order to use the software.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By omnicronx on 11/23/2009 2:44:20 PM , Rating: 5
I agree and disagree.

A company can write pretty much anything in their EULA, and you are perfectly correct when saying that half the stuff in there probably is not enforceable. That being said, when talking about usage of company owned servers, this is just not the case.

The reason that most things in the EULA are not enforceable is because the rules try to tell you what you can and cannot do with your own personal property. When talking about online gameplay, you are using THEIR servers, you are paying for the rights to access these servers and in doing so, you are agreeing to adhere to the rules of THEIR personal property.

This case will never go through for the reason of Xbox Live accounts being banned alone. Nobody wants to open that can of worms, (even a crazy texas judge).

RE: Bunch o' babies
By AyashiKaibutsu on 11/23/2009 2:51:15 PM , Rating: 5
I imagine the disabling of other offline functionality is what they'll push in the lawsuit.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By dark matter on 11/24/2009 5:04:49 AM , Rating: 4
Exactly. There is no justification to prevent the XBOX acting as an extender in order to prevent it playing copied games.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By BruceLeet on 11/24/2009 6:53:35 AM , Rating: 4
Being the large company MS is I'm willing to say they have had hundreds of lawyers and thousands of hours to review this EULA before they made it official.

You people are right though some EULA's are not 100% legal and can be brought to court with merit. I just doubt a company as large as Microsoft would create a dodgy EULA.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By rs1 on 11/23/2009 5:31:57 PM , Rating: 5
What about this one stands out as illegal?

You said it yourself:

Corrupting data was a kick below the belt

And also the fact that the update disabled hardware features built-in to the Xbox itself.

Microsoft can police its network however it wants. Nothing, however, gives them any right to damage, cripple, or disable consoles that they do not own. It doesn't matter what garbage they put in the EULA, if MS no longer owns the console, then they have no right to touch it. They can block it from their network if they want, but everything else they did was very legitimately questionable.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By lexluthermiester on 11/24/2009 6:10:50 AM , Rating: 4
They can block it from their network if they want, but everything else they did was very legitimately questionable.

Not to mention very illegal. It seems to me they are once again testing the legal waters to see how far they can go without being put in their place. But Microsoft is not alone in this area. There are many companies out there who would like us all to think that we really don't own our hardware or the software that we use with it. How wrong they are. Ownership statues clearly state that when a person pays money for something, they own it[in the case of rental agreements they own it for a time] and it is legally theirs to do with as they see fit within the realm of their personal use. These rights over-ride and supersede the DMCA and it's ilk.

This is why I personally have no problem with people who buy a copy of Windows[or any other software] and then install it on every pc they own through various methods. Microsoft has, in the past, been proven to be thieves, copyright and patent infringers and have very little room to cry "wolf". Now I want to be clear, if you don't own a legitimate copy of a peace of software that you use than you really are just stealing. But if you rightfully own a copy, then use it as you like. That's my opinion based on nearly a decade of research into copyright and fair-use laws.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Yames on 11/24/2009 5:09:36 PM , Rating: 2
And even if a suit is brought and won what, those 1 million console owners will still own crippled units and will receive maybe $20 in a year or two. Any way you slice it MS wins.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Samus on 11/24/2009 3:54:59 AM , Rating: 1
No where in the EULA does it state Microsoft will have authority to destroy your hardware.

And I also find it extremely difficult to believe that there are over 1 MILLION hacked XBOX360's. It isn't exactly an easy to modify console, and feel that not most, but many of the banned consoles are legitimate.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By omnicronx on 11/23/2009 2:16:37 PM , Rating: 5
We are talking about online gameplay here, this is one of the rare instances in which pretty much everything in the EULA is legally enforceable.

That being said, as I've previously stated, some were previous pointing out that MS actually disabled offline features such as Media center, this is where they could get in trouble if it turns out to be true.

On the otherhand anyone using any kind of mods whatever it will be during online gameplay is cheating, there is no such thing as a 'good' mod. A mod is there to give you an advantage where there previously was not one, thats called cheating my friends. If you want to do this offline, all the power to you, but the second you come online, thats where the line has to be drawn.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By dark matter on 11/24/2009 5:06:55 AM , Rating: 2
Remember GTA san andreas. That did not have online play. There was a mod for it that allowed online play. I fail to understand how that can be cheating as without it you couldn't even go online.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Nik00117 on 11/24/2009 7:41:24 AM , Rating: 2
Great point, he got owned.

A mod doesn't have to entail cheating. Example of a Mod that isn't cheating, let's just supposing you want your game to scream OWNED each time you kill someone is that really giving you an unfair advantage?

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Reclaimer77 on 11/23/09, Rating: 0
RE: Bunch o' babies
By xmichaelx on 11/23/2009 4:08:12 PM , Rating: 5
I'm pretty sure all EULA's are reviewed by some legal authority or commission.

This may shock you, but the entire world does not abide by U.S. law.
X-Box Live's EULA has been around for years and nobody has ever made a fuss over it

No one has made a fuss because this is the first time MS has done this. Perhaps you comb through EULAs looking for unenforceable clauses, but the average person has no reason to until something detrimental happens.

Also, several people on various lists who saw their machines get screwed up hadn't modded it, and so were already following the EULA.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Reclaimer77 on 11/23/09, Rating: 0
RE: Bunch o' babies
By Etern205 on 11/23/09, Rating: -1
RE: Bunch o' babies
By Reclaimer77 on 11/23/2009 11:55:12 PM , Rating: 3
Wait, what !?? I'm NOT in support of people modding. I'm clearly siding with Microsoft on this issue. What are you talking about ??

And lol@bringing up someones ratings on Daily Tech. As if that in any way reflects the quality of the poster.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By dark matter on 11/24/09, Rating: -1
RE: Bunch o' babies
By callmeroy on 11/24/2009 8:28:39 AM , Rating: 3
No he's right -- it doesn't....

As a very long time user of this site (this user name is my 3rd through the years -- and btw, not because of hidding but my own forgetfulness has caused me to need to make new ones), you get a feeling that many times posts are mod in a knee jerk reactions or to align with the popular trend of a thread - rather than well thought out personal view conflicts or reasoning.

Reclaimer 77 has pissed me off in posts in the past where I thought it was a jerk...but you know what other times I've agreed with his views as this one -- he's right.

The mod system is a joke here the only think that makes it annoying is when you actually really aren't trying to be a smart ass but instead to really give a reasoned view point based on either research or experience in something and some putz mods it down because they just feel like it.

(much like this one will be if my experience here has taught me

RE: Bunch o' babies
By eegake on 11/23/2009 5:25:05 PM , Rating: 1
You don't understand the practice of law. EULAs are manufactured out of whole cloth by bozo-nosed greed clowns and may contain nearly anything they fancy. Lawyers use the law to extract money from said bozo-nosed clowns by helping them with their avarice.

There are no authorities, there is no truth, goodness, or decency. I hope I'm not the first one to point this out to you.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By tmouse on 11/24/2009 7:57:52 AM , Rating: 2
Sorry but you are wrong. The EULA is simply a contract, nothing more. You could put anything you want into a contract, BUT local laws could render the contract invalid. MANY things are put into contracts that run counter to laws, as long as no one complains its considered OK. That's why all EULAs have some form of disclaimer at the end stating unless counter to local laws, or words to that effect. Here there could be at least two venues for action first is limiting access to 3rd parties for standard parts, like hard drives and DVD players, thus forcing people to purchase only parts Microsoft has financial interests in. Second there is no reasonable expectation that offline functionality would be effected when online ability is removed. So while it's their sandbox they can block you from playing in it BUT they cannot break your shovel and put a hole in your pail.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By jonmcc33 on 11/23/2009 4:22:11 PM , Rating: 3
When it comes to playing online on Xbox Live it is. It's a service that can be denied by the service provider. Microsoft hasn't prevented anyone from using their Xbox 360 at all. No laws broken.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By dark matter on 11/24/2009 5:11:33 AM , Rating: 2
Erm, they have removed a whole bunch of functionality from the XBOX. There appears to be no method of challenging that decision. And what is the accuracy rate of detecting modded consoles. How does disabling the XBOX as a media extender got to do with stopping people playing copied games online?

RE: Bunch o' babies
By leexgx on 11/23/2009 11:12:08 AM , Rating: 1
sueing MS will not work in this case, 1mill of users have modded there boxs to play MW2 if any thing give MS an way to charge users with fraud for Playing MW2 illegally

disabling the MCE part of the box is annoying but i guess its there so you cant play protected or unprotected files any more

RE: Bunch o' babies
By rippleyaliens on 11/23/2009 11:30:27 AM , Rating: 1
New business opportunity. Psychological Help to the Xbox live users that are going through withdrawal.. I have a cousin that is just SICK!!!!! He had his days off ready to log in an play mw2, whenn boommmmmmmmmm NADA,, that dude is just sick,, he was ranting and raving about blah blah blah, yet i even told him, Dude- IF ya hakd.. then you deal with being HAKD!!!!
His reason was to play the copied games and i mentioned, Again Dude- if you hakd, dont get mad getting HAKD!!!

This something for nothing mentality in this country is just urking ne to high heavens.. I Tell people, PAY/PLAY.. MEANING that if you pay for the game, you WILL play the hell out of it, as you Worked for it.. YOU do indeed get what you pay for.. Free = You get the satisfaction of playing for free until you get busted.. then You get SICK!!!!

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Modeverything on 11/23/2009 12:14:35 PM , Rating: 1
I Tell people, PAY/PLAY.. MEANING that if you pay for the game, you WILL play the hell out of it, as you Worked for it.. YOU do indeed get what you pay for..

I agree with your point here, however this will not always be the case. For example, I do purchase my games and my Xbox is not modded. I do however own a copy of Civilizations, that I've owned for a while. Well, somehow, the disk got a nick in it and I can't play it anymore. I found that companies generally only offer replacement disks for approx the first 90 days that you own the game, after that, nothing. I did pay for the game, however I can no longer play it.

I've experienced even greater headaches with PC games. I've had damaged discs, and even games that would refuse to play because of copy protection; and I used the actual game disc. Also, before you ask about image drives, I did have an image drive installed to mount iso files, however I uninstalled my image drives, and even uninstalled all of the iso creating software and some of the games still wouldn't play..

Anyway, my point is I believe there should be some legitimate way to backup your purchased disks to a hard disk and play from there. I'm not claiming I know how to make this work, but I do understand the desire to mod an Xbox to play games, though I do agree that the person should purchase the game they want to play.

Sometimes, you can pay for a game and you don't get to "play the hell out of it".

One more thought...I highly support the idea of Steam on PC. I know you can purchase and download games on Xbox as well, but it's my understanding that they're encrypted and the only way to decrypt them is to get a key that loads each time you sign into Xbox Live. I don't know if that is true, but it's what I heard. I don't like the encryption idea, because if I ever cancel my Xbox Live account, or lose my internet, or change gamertags or whatever, I may lose the games I purchased.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By MamiyaOtaru on 11/23/2009 7:27:47 PM , Rating: 2

RE: Bunch o' babies
By sld3 on 11/23/2009 12:11:23 PM , Rating: 1
I don't understand why you are defending Microsoft...have you forgotten the RROD and the most unreliable console a lawyer, I can tell you personally that companies put lots of things in agreements that are not legally enforceable so that people who have a lack of knowledge about the law will think they cannot do anything about it....I will even give you an example....many companies put a "Bankruptcy Clause" in contracts stating that you cannot declare bankruptcy if you cannot pay the loan...those are not legally enforceable...always remember that just because some company has it in their contract does not make it legal or right.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Hiawa23 on 11/23/2009 12:38:24 PM , Rating: 4
I don't understand why you are defending Microsoft...have you forgotten the RROD and the most unreliable console EVER...

No one is defending MS, & the RROD issue has nothing to do with this. Does anyone think these comapanies really care about you other than getting you to spend your money, cause they don't.

I own 2 360s my 11/2/05 model went in for repair June 08, & was returned & has been fine, my newer model has not had any issue. I, like many are not giving em a pass but the rules are what they are. For those who don't agree please let us know how the lawsuit turns out, in the meantime support the PC, & Sony, or Nintendo.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Hiawa23 on 11/23/2009 12:32:23 PM , Rating: 3
Seems simple to me. If you want to play your Xbox online, don't mod it. Arguing who is wrong or right is moot, & suing a company as huge as MS with their, resources, sigh.....Well, good luck with that. Just get a Playstation3, & that will show em. The rules are simple, no one is telling you you can't do whatever you want to your console, but MS says if you do, & we can detect it, we will ban you. End of Story...

RE: Bunch o' babies
By FITCamaro on 11/23/2009 12:46:47 PM , Rating: 1
Couldn't have said it better myself.

And for the idiot above who mentioned the RROD, what does that have to do with this article? Nothing.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By rcc on 11/23/2009 4:22:29 PM , Rating: 2
It's part of the new age responsibility thing. Someone did something wrong at some point, therefore I am justified in anything I do to them, ever.

Some day reality will penetrate the haze.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By jdietz on 11/23/2009 1:54:27 PM , Rating: 5
Someone please quote the fulltext of the piece of the EULA that says they can break your console if you violate the EULA.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Mitch101 on 11/23/2009 3:05:35 PM , Rating: 2
They didn't break the console the console will still play games but not online.

Abingdon IP or list of attorneys here:

A whois reveals the only attorney listed is also the domain registrar also.

Po-Dunk operation thats getting more press than it should. Probably hoping to get a settlement, collect a bunch of peoples info, and make a name for itself.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By webdawg77 on 11/23/2009 3:07:02 PM , Rating: 2
"In addition, your use of the Service is subject to your compliance with the Code of Conduct ( and its successors). You agree that we may also discontinue your access to the Service if you do any of the following while connected to the Service:"

From Section 5 via

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Soodey on 11/23/2009 6:44:04 PM , Rating: 5
Few people here have problems with them blocking access to xbox live; it makes sense and they have every right to do that. But to remove/break features from the console that don't require access to their online service (Media Center) and intentionally corrupting users saves and preventing future saves ultimately rendering the console useless as a gaming machine is the problem I, and I assume many others, have with this whole ordeal.

RE: Bunch o' babies
By Kahnivorous on 11/26/2009 5:19:02 PM , Rating: 2
I seem to remember quite a few console fan boys making hateful comments about PC fan boys and how they hacked and jacked themselves in to the gaming minority. And, I remember them saying it was the PC gamer that made game creators favor Console over PC.

The difference between PCs and Consoles is the control. Because Consoles are extremely simple by design, they can be easily controlled compared to PCs. Any Console maker that says otherwise is flat out misleading you.

EULA or not, Consoles give them more control over what you play, how you play, and make them filthy rich while doing it.

"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain

Latest Headlines

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki