Print 18 comment(s) - last by amanojaku.. on Nov 23 at 3:30 PM

Mark Hoefer and Prabhakar Bandaru  (Source: UCSD)
Discovery could lead to smaller batteries with more power and run time

Nanotechnology may one day usher in a new era for electronics and other products with smaller portable devices that run longer than the electronics we use today. Much research is being conducted on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for a myriad of uses including electronics and batteries.

Battery research is being conducted in several different areas. Researchers at MIT are using viruses to create batteries that can hold more power and run for longer periods. Battery research is a hot bed of activity because the batteries can be used in automobiles to help reduce pollution and our need for oil. Improvements in battery technology will also lead to smaller computers and mobile phones that offer more run time with each charge.

One of the hallmarks of carbon nanotubes is that fact that the CNTs are just about perfect according to researchers. A professor and a graduate student at UC San Diego have discovered that by introducing purposeful defects into CNT structures the defective CNTs work better for the development of super capacitors.

Professor Prabhakar Bandaru said, "While batteries have large storage capacity, they take a long time to charge; while electrostatic capacitors can charge quickly but typically have limited capacity. However, super capacitors electrochemical capacitors incorporate the advantages of both."

Bandaru is working with graduate student Mark Hoefer on the research program studying CNTs. The pair discovered that introducing purposeful defects into the CNT structure created additional charge sites and enhanced the charge storage properties of the CNT.

Hoefer said, "We first realized that defective CNTs could be used for energy storage when we were investigating their use as electrodes for chemical sensors. During our initial tests we noticed that we were able to create charged defects that could be used to increase CNT charge storage capabilities."

The researchers also found that other methods could increase or decrease the charge capacity of the CNTs with defects such as bombarding them with argon or hydrogen.

Bandaru said, "It is important to control this process carefully as too many defects can deteriorate the electrical conductivity, which is the reason for the use of CNTs in the first place. Good conductivity helps in efficient charge transport and increases the power density of these devices."

The interesting part of this research is that one of the things that first drew scientists and researchers to study CNTs was the fact that the CNTs are nominally considered to be perfect structurally. In this instance, the CNTs are better when they have a certain amount of defects.

The two researchers think that their discovery could lead to electronics that charge faster and last longer than what we have today. Bandaru understands that much more research is required on the subject and hopes that more researchers and engineers will investigate the discovery.

Hoefer said, "We hope that our research will spark future interest in utilizing CNTs as electrodes in charge storage devices with greater energy and power densities."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Grammer, content?
By Treckin on 11/22/2009 6:08:48 PM , Rating: 0
This writeup, while suffering from the usual dailytech quality of editorship, also says the same thing over and over again. And not in particularly cleaver or different ways each time.


Every paragraph says this in one way or another. From personal experience, on DT this means that the source article wasn't long, and something went screwy during the plagiarism process.

RE: Grammer, content?
By bigbubbajoe on 11/22/2009 11:02:05 PM , Rating: 3
Quality of editorship is important.

I believe that proper grammar is also very important.

Finally, I must say that your all caps sentence is particularly clever.

RE: Grammer, content?
By CurseTheSky on 11/22/2009 11:56:42 PM , Rating: 5
Did you, perhaps, mean "grammar?"

RE: Grammer, content?
By Treckin on 11/23/09, Rating: 0
RE: Grammer, content?
By Leper Messiah on 11/23/2009 9:14:37 AM , Rating: 2
If you're going to castigate someone for their grammar, at least take the time to make sure you're not making a myriad of typographical errors yourself. "Grammer", "Cleaver", the sentence fragment at the beginning of your first paragraph are just a few examples of why you shouldn't flame others for something you can't do well yourself.

RE: Grammer, content?
By amanojaku on 11/23/2009 3:30:09 PM , Rating: 2
you shouldn't flame others for something you can't do well yourself.
Hasn't stopped politicians from criticizing business practices.

Or the general public about sports.

Or husbands and wives about anything the other does.

Or anyone on DT about anyone else on DT. ;-)

“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls
Related Articles
MIT Researchers Create Virus Battery
April 3, 2009, 11:32 AM

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki