backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by chunkymonster.. on Dec 2 at 12:31 PM


(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)
Also USB 3.0 and 6Gb/s SATA support

We are on the eve of Intel's 32nm High-K Metal Gate CPU product launch. The first chips in the Westmere family will be low-cost 32nm dual core Clarkdale CPUs integrating a 45nm graphics die on the same package. They will be marketed as Core i3 CPUs for budget-conscious consumers.

While the P55 chipsets have been paired with the Core i5 CPUs, that platform is designed for the mainstream performance market. It can support Core i3 CPUs, but won't be able to take advantage of the integrated graphics.

The majority of Core i3 buyers will be looking for a low cost system using integrated graphics, but still has features that make it a worthwhile upgrade.

DailyTech has received information on the P7H57D-V EVO, which will be ASUS' premium motherboard for Core i3 builders. It has routing for the Flexible Display Interface, which will allow the use of integrated graphics through HDMI, DVI, or VGA outputs.

ASUS was the first motherboard manufacturer to ship boards with support for USB 3.0 and 6Gb/s SATA, and the P7H57D-V EVO will continue that trend. Both of these interfaces have significantly increased speeds that will keep them relevant well into the next decade, despite Intel's delayed integration of the new standards into their chipsets.

There are two 6 Gb/s SATA ports (in white), as well as six 3 Gb/s SATA ports on the side. Two SuperSpeed USB 3.0 ports (in blue) are added to the fourteen USB 2.0 ports normally found. ASUS is using the same PLX chip as in their previous offerings: the P7P55D-E-Premium using Intel's P55 chipset and the P6X58D Premium built on the X58 chipset.

Information on the launch date and pricing of the P7H57D-V EVO is not yet available.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What more do you need?
By amanojaku on 11/17/2009 11:12:27 AM , Rating: 2
You can get an AMD quad for as little as $100 and an Intel quad for as little as $150. A dual core is literally half that, so it all depends on your wants and needs. $50 is reasonable for the potential performance improvement. I dare you to name any other part besides RAM that can provide noticeable performance improvements for only $50 more.

Anyway, application support isn't the only reason to go multi-core. Operating systems that can use all the cores can balance processes over processors. Imagine having your kernel and all of your drivers on one core, your P2P, er, downloader and AV on another, and your game on two cores.

The same parallel can be drawn for 64-bit. Few applications need 16EiB of RAM, but most applications can use 1-4GB. Instead of sharing RAM at the risk of paging, each 32-bit application can have its own "dedicated" 4GB memory space.

I'll take the quad, thanks. I'm not hurting for $50. :-)


RE: What more do you need?
By dark matter on 11/17/2009 11:37:52 AM , Rating: 2
Just because it says Quad does not automatically make it better than a dual.

Many other factors come into play, such as clock speed, die size, L1 cache.

No doubt you always assume that an 10 megapixel camera beats a 6 megapixel camera.


RE: What more do you need?
By Taft12 on 11/17/2009 1:06:40 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
I'll take the quad, thanks. I'm not hurting for $50.


A passionate post, but in the end you gave the marketers what they wanted one way or another: a sale!


“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki