backtop


Print 135 comment(s) - last by ThePooBurner.. on Nov 6 at 3:54 PM

Study predicts that in 400 years average woman will weigh nearly 1 kg more, be 2 cm (almost an inch) shorter

A strong body of evidence exists that humans are continually evolving a diverse fashion in response to various environmental influences.  Despite skepticism from some who blindly reject such studies for various dogmatic reasons, human evolution does appear to be happening.  And researchers in the fields of genetics and evolutionary biology are revealing exciting insights into what man (and woman) may look like in the future.

A new study from Yale University researchers offers some intriguing and unusual conclusions about where human evolution may be headed.  A new study analyzing a population of 14,000 residents of the Massachusetts town of Framingham indicates that women are being naturally selected to be shorter and chubbier, have children younger, and have lower cholesterol and blood pressure.

The complex study came to these conclusions by looking at the medical records of 2,238 female participants, spread across two generations (starting in 1948) and looking at their medical history when they reached menopause.  The study examined those that successfully reproduced and looked at what traits influenced their reproductive success.  It also made adjustments for income, education and lifestyle choices such as smoking, before applying correlations to determine the direction of evolution.  They also looked at secondary effects, i.e. whether low blood pressure led to younger sexual maturity, or whether the paths were independent.

Based on the results women in the third generation of the study, currently ongoing, are expected to begin their first period a month earlier, and enter menopause a full month later than their mothers and grandmothers, on average.  Heaviness proved to be also be selected, as heavier women have more children, on average.

Professor Stephen Stearns, an evolutionary biologist at Yale University and coauthor of the study states, "The idea that natural selection has stopped operating in humans because we have gotten better at keeping people alive is just plain wrong.  It's interesting that the underlying biological framework is still detectable beneath the culture."

The Yale experts predict that based on the current trends, in the year 2409AD, the average woman in Framingham will be 2 cm  (almost 1 inch) shorter and 1 kg heavier (approximately 2.5 lb).  Women in 2409 AD are predicted to have their period 5 months earlier and to go into menopause 10 months later -- almost a full year later.

Sean G. Byars, a post-doctoral researcher at Yale, was lead author of the paper, and researchers from University of Pennsylvania and the Boston University School of Medicine also contributed to it.  The intriguing study was funded by Yale University and was published in a prestigious journal -- the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences -- on October 19.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I read a different study
By Yawgm0th on 11/2/2009 3:29:17 PM , Rating: 2
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/arti...

quote:
The researchers have found beautiful women have more children than their plainer counterparts and that a higher proportion of those children are female. Those daughters, once adult, also tend to be attractive and so repeat the pattern.


Basically, the causal relationship is because attractive women are more likely to reproduce thanks to natural selection.

Of course, how can you realistically do a scientific study based on a subjective trait like beauty? Still, it makes so much more sense that attractive women are more likely to reproduce and pass on those sexy genes of theirs.




RE: I read a different study
By Spivonious on 11/2/2009 3:36:37 PM , Rating: 2
Attractive women = horny guys = more reproduction

Did they really need a study for that?


RE: I read a different study
By FITCamaro on 11/2/2009 3:42:34 PM , Rating: 5
Go to Walmart and the theory of hot women have more kids is easily disproved.

Granted maybe they were hot before they had kids.


RE: I read a different study
By Iaiken on 11/2/2009 3:47:38 PM , Rating: 4
I am rarely with FIT, but he may be on to something:

www.peopleofwalmart.com

BE AFRAID!


RE: I read a different study
By mattclary on 11/2/2009 3:54:43 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed.


RE: I read a different study
By chmilz on 11/2/2009 4:18:42 PM , Rating: 2
Nope, they were ugly from the get-go.


RE: I read a different study
By rcc on 11/2/2009 5:27:11 PM , Rating: 5
You are missing an important factor though.

A higher percentage of beautiful women are vain, and take particular care not to become pregnant as they think it makes them less beautiful.

Like everything else, pick your dataset and you get the answers you want. : )


“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki