backtop


Print 135 comment(s) - last by ThePooBurner.. on Nov 6 at 3:54 PM

Study predicts that in 400 years average woman will weigh nearly 1 kg more, be 2 cm (almost an inch) shorter

A strong body of evidence exists that humans are continually evolving a diverse fashion in response to various environmental influences.  Despite skepticism from some who blindly reject such studies for various dogmatic reasons, human evolution does appear to be happening.  And researchers in the fields of genetics and evolutionary biology are revealing exciting insights into what man (and woman) may look like in the future.

A new study from Yale University researchers offers some intriguing and unusual conclusions about where human evolution may be headed.  A new study analyzing a population of 14,000 residents of the Massachusetts town of Framingham indicates that women are being naturally selected to be shorter and chubbier, have children younger, and have lower cholesterol and blood pressure.

The complex study came to these conclusions by looking at the medical records of 2,238 female participants, spread across two generations (starting in 1948) and looking at their medical history when they reached menopause.  The study examined those that successfully reproduced and looked at what traits influenced their reproductive success.  It also made adjustments for income, education and lifestyle choices such as smoking, before applying correlations to determine the direction of evolution.  They also looked at secondary effects, i.e. whether low blood pressure led to younger sexual maturity, or whether the paths were independent.

Based on the results women in the third generation of the study, currently ongoing, are expected to begin their first period a month earlier, and enter menopause a full month later than their mothers and grandmothers, on average.  Heaviness proved to be also be selected, as heavier women have more children, on average.

Professor Stephen Stearns, an evolutionary biologist at Yale University and coauthor of the study states, "The idea that natural selection has stopped operating in humans because we have gotten better at keeping people alive is just plain wrong.  It's interesting that the underlying biological framework is still detectable beneath the culture."

The Yale experts predict that based on the current trends, in the year 2409AD, the average woman in Framingham will be 2 cm  (almost 1 inch) shorter and 1 kg heavier (approximately 2.5 lb).  Women in 2409 AD are predicted to have their period 5 months earlier and to go into menopause 10 months later -- almost a full year later.

Sean G. Byars, a post-doctoral researcher at Yale, was lead author of the paper, and researchers from University of Pennsylvania and the Boston University School of Medicine also contributed to it.  The intriguing study was funded by Yale University and was published in a prestigious journal -- the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences -- on October 19.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I offer an alternate hypothysis...
By Alexstarfire on 11/2/2009 3:25:37 PM , Rating: 2
Shorter and fatter = less cholesterol and lower blood pressure? How did they come to that conclusion?


RE: I offer an alternate hypothysis...
By kattanna on 11/2/2009 4:26:18 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Shorter and fatter = less cholesterol and lower blood pressure? How did they come to that conclusion?


probably the same way a dozen cherry picked tree rings spells out the end of the world through flooding and ever increasing global temperatures

;>)


By theapparition on 11/2/2009 5:42:47 PM , Rating: 3
This is being so overexaggerated.

In 400 years, they expect the average women to weigh 2.2lbs more and be close to an inch shorter. What's the big deal????

Even if the studies small sample size and extrapolations are questionable.


By Ammohunt on 11/3/2009 1:54:22 PM , Rating: 2
Being overweight does not mean you are un-health as a matter of fact the opposite is more often true esspecially in the wild and when it comes to fitness to reproduce.


By callmeroy on 11/4/2009 9:55:46 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Shorter and fatter = less cholesterol and lower blood pressure? How did they come to that conclusion?


Amazingly a lot of folks make this same FALSE assumption -- high cholesterol isn't directly tied to being over weight. Logically it makes sense because the assumption goes that if someone is overweight they are probably eating lots of junk food. However, there are folks I know and I myself am about 40 pounds overweight (btw I'm working on it -- 4 months ago I was 60 pounds overweight!) and have "healthy" levels of cholesterol. Any doctor worth his salt will deem any cholestrol level above 150-160ish to be starting to lean toward the warning zone, over 200 you just flat out have high cholesterol. I know more than a few folks who are anywhere from 20 to one friend of mine who is easily 100 pounds overweight and yet their cholesterol levels are all well below 200. Oddly enough since these folks are all aware of their health risks and are trying to get in better shape, yes -- in fact we have spoken about cholesterol levels as a group of friends while working out...

Being overweight is mostly a self control/will power thing, but I do feel some people just don't understand that for some very overweight folks its WAY more than self-control or will power....but you can preach that until you are blue in the face and some folks will NEVER understand it.


“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki