Print 45 comment(s) - last by atlmann10.. on Oct 27 at 12:07 AM

Delay will greatly impact USB 3.0 adoption in 2010

When it comes to backing up large amounts of data, many computer users will agree that USB 2.0 speeds are simply not fast enough. This has led to eSATA and other connectivity solutions that can provide more bandwidth than USB 2.0 is capable of for the storage industry.

Those looking forward to the wide rollout of USB 3.0 will be saddened to hear that the specification has been dealt a setback. This summer, expectations were that USB 3.0 devices and computers supporting USB 3.0 would be available before 2010.

A source at a top-tier computer maker has confirmed to EETimes that USB 3.0 support in key Intel chipsets has been postponed until 2011. Support for USB 3.0 was expected to show up in early 2010 for Intel chipsets. The same top-tier PC maker source also told EETimes that wireless USB was effectively dead. Rather than moving to wireless USB, which has had many supporting startups and interest groups close up shop, the industry buzz is now focusing on 60 GHz technology.

With Intel not offering wide support for USB 3.0 in its chipsets in 2010, adoption of the specification will reportedly be limited to a few high-end graphics workstations and consumer PCs. The makers of these systems will be forced to buy discrete host controllers for their boards, which will make the parts high-cost items.

The unnamed source added, "It's hard to commit to an emerging technology like this (USB 3.0) when the key silicon enablers are not making it a priority. You get into a chicken-and-egg situation." USB 3.0 "won't get real traction until it gets integrated in the chip sets," said the source.

As for why USB 3.0 was postponed after a big showing at IDF, the source told EETimes, "Tech and strategy groups (at Intel) are not always aligned with the product development teams that are in the mode of trying to make revenue and prioritize what to integrate."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Single biggest blunder since the P4
By FXi on 10/22/2009 7:32:59 PM , Rating: 4
This is the single biggest mistake since the P4. And it's probably bigger.

The #1 way for laptops to communicate is via USB. This is a 10x increase in speed and it's take 8 years to come around. Intel was on the founding committee to develop the spec. And they "didn't know what was going on because that was in another development group"?

Don't know what kind of a company Intel is, but where I come from, to miss a development cycle on this massive a scale would cause people to lose jobs, big people and big jobs. The economy is down, but that's not why the tech sector is suffering. The tech sector has issued nothing but minor updates for the past 3 years. The first major change was the integration of the memory controller, but this is the #1 way PC's talk to peripherals, and they missed the boat.

Now let's suppose the 30% of the potential buying public puts off purchases because of this delay. People are spending money a lot more carefully and there isn't the kind of free money there used to be. So that would be a huge loss of sales in an economy that needs those sales. They'll blame it on "no one is buying" when it's really "we aren't selling the stuff right now that people want in their tech items".

8 years and they missed the boat. Nice job Intel. Your shareholders are sure going to be pissed off.

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki