Print 45 comment(s) - last by atlmann10.. on Oct 27 at 12:07 AM

Delay will greatly impact USB 3.0 adoption in 2010

When it comes to backing up large amounts of data, many computer users will agree that USB 2.0 speeds are simply not fast enough. This has led to eSATA and other connectivity solutions that can provide more bandwidth than USB 2.0 is capable of for the storage industry.

Those looking forward to the wide rollout of USB 3.0 will be saddened to hear that the specification has been dealt a setback. This summer, expectations were that USB 3.0 devices and computers supporting USB 3.0 would be available before 2010.

A source at a top-tier computer maker has confirmed to EETimes that USB 3.0 support in key Intel chipsets has been postponed until 2011. Support for USB 3.0 was expected to show up in early 2010 for Intel chipsets. The same top-tier PC maker source also told EETimes that wireless USB was effectively dead. Rather than moving to wireless USB, which has had many supporting startups and interest groups close up shop, the industry buzz is now focusing on 60 GHz technology.

With Intel not offering wide support for USB 3.0 in its chipsets in 2010, adoption of the specification will reportedly be limited to a few high-end graphics workstations and consumer PCs. The makers of these systems will be forced to buy discrete host controllers for their boards, which will make the parts high-cost items.

The unnamed source added, "It's hard to commit to an emerging technology like this (USB 3.0) when the key silicon enablers are not making it a priority. You get into a chicken-and-egg situation." USB 3.0 "won't get real traction until it gets integrated in the chip sets," said the source.

As for why USB 3.0 was postponed after a big showing at IDF, the source told EETimes, "Tech and strategy groups (at Intel) are not always aligned with the product development teams that are in the mode of trying to make revenue and prioritize what to integrate."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Not all bad
By KingstonU on 10/22/2009 1:22:28 PM , Rating: 2
I'm in the exact same boat, 3.6GHz Q9550 and soon an SSD. Though I am thinking that PCIe SSD is going to prove itself to be a much better solution than Current SATA 2 SSD's and future SATA 3 SSD's.

It is already possible and PCIe is as widely available as USB. There are already products (Like OCZ Z-series) with more on the way, and the speeds are already faster than SATA 3 will ever be, reaching 1000MB/s read/write already.

Now if they make one in the next couple months at same random read/write speeds as Indilix/Intel drives, ~500MB/s sequential read/write speeds, and $3/GB and TRIM. I'm in.

RE: Not all bad
By RubberJohnny on 10/22/2009 11:46:01 PM , Rating: 2
Now if they make one in the next couple months at same random read/write speeds as Indilix/Intel drives, ~500MB/s sequential read/write speeds, and $3/GB and TRIM. I'm in.

Keep dreaming...

RE: Not all bad
By motigez1 on 10/23/2009 5:38:31 AM , Rating: 2
Expect New SSD's with 500MB/s early next year with similar random, and I think this time AMD (SB 8xx) will have a head start over Intel in both SATA 3 and USB 3.0 of at least 6 months.
It will remain up to us the consumers to thank AMD for the innovation and buy more of their systems.
For the enthusiastic, AMD will surely going to have I/O advantage!

"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki