Print 45 comment(s) - last by atlmann10.. on Oct 27 at 12:07 AM

Delay will greatly impact USB 3.0 adoption in 2010

When it comes to backing up large amounts of data, many computer users will agree that USB 2.0 speeds are simply not fast enough. This has led to eSATA and other connectivity solutions that can provide more bandwidth than USB 2.0 is capable of for the storage industry.

Those looking forward to the wide rollout of USB 3.0 will be saddened to hear that the specification has been dealt a setback. This summer, expectations were that USB 3.0 devices and computers supporting USB 3.0 would be available before 2010.

A source at a top-tier computer maker has confirmed to EETimes that USB 3.0 support in key Intel chipsets has been postponed until 2011. Support for USB 3.0 was expected to show up in early 2010 for Intel chipsets. The same top-tier PC maker source also told EETimes that wireless USB was effectively dead. Rather than moving to wireless USB, which has had many supporting startups and interest groups close up shop, the industry buzz is now focusing on 60 GHz technology.

With Intel not offering wide support for USB 3.0 in its chipsets in 2010, adoption of the specification will reportedly be limited to a few high-end graphics workstations and consumer PCs. The makers of these systems will be forced to buy discrete host controllers for their boards, which will make the parts high-cost items.

The unnamed source added, "It's hard to commit to an emerging technology like this (USB 3.0) when the key silicon enablers are not making it a priority. You get into a chicken-and-egg situation." USB 3.0 "won't get real traction until it gets integrated in the chip sets," said the source.

As for why USB 3.0 was postponed after a big showing at IDF, the source told EETimes, "Tech and strategy groups (at Intel) are not always aligned with the product development teams that are in the mode of trying to make revenue and prioritize what to integrate."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

bloody hell
By XZerg on 10/22/2009 10:43:39 AM , Rating: 2
damned Intel...

I wonder what AMD is up to on this? SATA6 and USB3 should attract few users more if AMD manages to one up Intel on this early on. But I won't hold my breathe on them either - their priority needs to be on the cpu front where they are bleeding/hurting very badly.

Although MSI was known to have a board ready that has USB3 and SATA6 support - obviously not native - but beats no support or an addin card that costs arm and a leg.

RE: bloody hell
By geddarkstorm on 10/22/2009 1:04:39 PM , Rating: 2
Intel just made a fiber optic port which can scale from 10 Gbps to 100 Gbps (if I remember right). They are probably turning their focus to that, as it blows USB and anything else out of the water.

RE: bloody hell
By drank12quartsstrohsbeer on 10/22/2009 1:24:22 PM , Rating: 2
That was my frst thought too. Why should Intel push USB3 when they can get royalty payments pushing thier tech?
That worked for HDMI....

RE: bloody hell
By Don321 on 10/22/2009 3:35:15 PM , Rating: 1
Why was there no DailyTech article on Light Peak even though every other tech website had one and it's pretty big news for the industry? Maybe I just didn't see it, but regardless, who cares about USB 3.0 when Light Peak is around the corner anyway?

"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki