Report Urges Government Not to Spend a Lot on Cyberdefense
October 9, 2009 2:20 PM
comment(s) - last by
Should our nation spend more money to safeguard us against nations like China that are reportedly grooming legions of military hackers and striking out at the U.S. and other nations? A new report argues the opposite, saying cyberdefense is confusing and should not be a spending priority. It advocates focusing existing resources on military networks.
(Source: Fox News)
A new study recommends a cautious approach when defending the nation against cyberterrorism
Be ready for both defense and offense. Cover all routes of attack. Practice careful surveillance. All of these would seemingly be logical paradigms for
our nation's cybersecurity efforts
. However, a
takes a different bent and says that the nation shouldn't make cybersecurity its top priority and instead should focus on reallocating limited resources to defence of critical infrastructure.
The new report from the RAND Corporation says that
, telephone service, banking, and military command and control in the U.S. are all accessible and able to be attacked from the internet. That makes them open to attack, according to the report. RAND's press release describes, "Working against connected but weakly protected computer systems, hackers can steal information, make the systems malfunction by sending them false commands and corrupt the systems with bogus information."
Martin C. Libicki, the report's lead author and senior management scientist at RAND, a nonprofit research organization, adds, "Adversaries in future wars are likely to go after each other's information systems using computer hacking. The lessons from traditional warfare cannot be adapted to apply to attacks on computer networks. Cyberspace must be addressed in its own terms."
The report says that estimates of current cyberwarfare damage to our nation aren't consistent and cite anything from several billion yearly to hundreds of billions.
According to the report, military networks should be top priority when it comes to defense, as attacks on military networks are potentially the most potent. They describe a hypothetical scenario in which an enemy could silence missile defenses of a nation and then pound its critical targets with rockets.
The report says that offensive cyberwarfare is largely useless as it tends to bother, but not generally disarm adversaries. Further, Libicki warns that cyberattacks are amorphous and
determining the identity of attackers
is largely guesswork. Attempts at counterattacks are thus largely futile, according to the report. States Libicki, "This is not an enterprise where means and ends can be calibrated to one another. As a result, it is ill-suited for strategic warfare."
Rather than try to target nations or launch counterattacks, the study suggests a focus on diplomatic, economic and prosecutorial efforts against cyber attackers. However, the report suggest that such efforts not be made a priority in the nation's spending. Reads the release, "Libicki does not recommend the United States make strategic cyber warfare a priority investment."
Other recent reports have taken a different bent, advocating more funding. They have argued that the U.S. is
woefully unprepared for cyberattack
. They also point to nations like China that are grooming legions of computer-savvy troops to launch cyberstrikes.
The RAND study was federally financed, with the goal of offering independent policy alternatives for the U.S. Air Force.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Meaningless report
10/9/2009 3:58:15 PM
Your wrong. A very small nuclear blast in space (near the planet) or the upper atmosphere of the planet can effectively knock out entire continents with an EMP. Its pretty much why dont test nukes in the upper atmosphere/space (near the planet) anymore.
RE: Meaningless report
10/12/2009 5:43:59 AM
while you are correct, the chinese would have to get that weapon over the USA if they want to do that. This is impossible without it being noticed.
doing such a thing is likely to get them nuked back.
"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes
Cyber Assault Lays Waste to U.S. Gov't Websites, North Korea Suspected
July 8, 2009, 9:23 AM
US Military Creates Cyber Defense Department
June 24, 2009, 4:09 PM
Report: Foreign Cyberspies Attack Electrical Grid
April 9, 2009, 8:44 AM
War Games Show U.S. to Be Soft, Unprepared for Cyber Attack
December 22, 2008, 5:22 PM
Apple Adds New Password Protection for Third Party iCloud Apps
September 17, 2014, 8:50 PM
Facebook Tests Moments App, Aims to Keep Your Private Memories Private
September 17, 2014, 5:46 PM
Russian Hackers Compile List of 10+ Million Stolen Gmail, Yandex, Mailru
September 11, 2014, 11:41 AM
House Minority Leader Pelosi Criticizes FCC's "Fast-Lane" Net Neutrality Plan
September 9, 2014, 4:15 PM
Smarter Than Siri? Cortana Adds Game NFL Game Winner Prediction
September 3, 2014, 4:12 PM
Apple Says Nude Celebrity Photo Dump Wasn’t Result of iCloud, Find My iPhone Breach
September 2, 2014, 3:26 PM
Most Popular Articles
HTC Preps Nexus 9 With Nvidia K1 64-Bit "Denver" SoC, Android L Onboard
September 10, 2014, 10:21 PM
Apple iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus Reviews Roll In
September 16, 2014, 9:13 PM
Dell Announces "World's Thinnest" Tablet: The Venue 8 7000 Series
September 11, 2014, 8:51 AM
Samsung Calls Out “Copycat” Apple for 5.5” iPhone 6 Plus in New Ads
September 14, 2014, 11:06 PM
Confirmed: Next Generation of Windows to Be Announced on September 30
September 15, 2014, 4:43 PM
Latest Blog Posts
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information