The EC demanded Microsoft offer a
ballot selection screen to allow users to pick their browser of
choice with Windows 7. Microsoft at first refused, saying it
include IE 8 in European copies of Windows 7. In the end,
though, Microsoft came
around and agreed
to a ballot screen.
The EC had some minor complaints about
Microsoft's first proposal -- mainly its lack of information to users
about what the browsers were to help them make their selection.
Under the new proposal, which the EC calls much "improved"
users could find out information on what a browser is from the ballot
screen. They would also have access to additional information
about each browser they could install, to help them make their
Under the new proposal, the balloting system
would work for five years after purchase on any new install.
Windows 7 and all future versions of Windows would implement this
EC showed Microsoft some love, with a regulator
stating, "The commission's concern has been that PC users should
have an effective and unbiased choice between Internet Explorer and
competing Web browsers to ensure competition on the merits and to
allow consumers to benefit from technical development and innovation
both on the Web-browser market and on related markets, such as
Brad Smith, general counsel of
Microsoft stated that his company was "pleased by today's
Microsoft and Europe have had a rocky
relationship, with Microsoft fined
899 million euros ($1.35 billion) in 2008 for antitrust
violations. Brad Smith says that situation has greatly turned
around, though. He gave Europe some love back, stating, "It's
heartening to see the much better relationship that exists today."
quote: Why O.E.M.s have/get this sort of diplomatic immunity ?
quote: There is a good amount of competition amongst OEMs, so they are not able to act as monopolies.
quote: As you may recall, the Commission's position is that PC users should have an effective and unbiased choice between Internet Explorer and competing web browsers to ensure competition on the merits.
quote: So this crappy practice (as you call it) denies the user an effective/unbiased choice between browsers,as the OEM installs the default browser of highest bidder (Microsft or Google).
quote: OEMs will not give you the ballot screen !
quote: It cleary shows the E.U. is more interested in hitting Microsoft with fines rather than free choices & competition.
quote: Build your own.
quote: They (the top 6) in fact have (collectively) a monopoly over the PC market.
quote: I may reject 1 OEM's pcs, but when all of them indulge in the same practice,then what choices are left.
quote: you are essentially claiming that OEMS are price fixing
quote: its called market demand and the price someone is willing to pay.
quote: Dont expect the OEMs to openly admit the above facts. Hey if you compare prices all these OEMs match each other prices plus/minus around a certain price range,ofcourse depending on matching components (cpus/memory/Hds/gpus etc etc)
quote: Small competitors just cannot match the top 6 (heavily subsidized/sponsored) in their offerings & prices.
quote: There is NO market demand for bundled software-nobody asked for it, neither wants it leave alone paying for it.
quote: The E.U. demands from Microsoft the ballot screen, whilst lets the OEMs sell the choice of the default browser to highest bidder.
quote: If you just go around making your own standards just because you can you effectively control the whole market giving competition no chance.
quote: but capitalism states that if you sell a product you should be able to bundle what you want with that product.
quote: That being said, it should only cover markets in which the product is not free.
quote: Your argument that they use this crapware to leverage a price decrease is incorrect as that would mean the price to build your own (minus crapware) is more expensive with exactly the same hardware.