Print 30 comment(s) - last by lithographer.. on Sep 29 at 10:48 AM

Mark Bohr discusses 22nm logic tech  (Source: Intel)

The P1270 22nm process is expected to scale similarly to 32nm
The company is preparing to do battle in 2011 and beyond

There have been many details made available at the Intel Developer Forum about future Clarkdale desktop and Arrandale mobile chips. Yields are very good and defect density is steadily decreasing. They will be launched very soon as part of the 32nm Westmere family.

Intel also revealed some details about production of chips using the Sandy Bridge architecture in 2010. The company's "tick-tock" strategy of alternating annual process shrinks and new microarchitecture has been quite effective. The Westmere die shrink will be the next "tick", while Sandy Bridge will be the next "tock". After that will come the 22nm Ivy Bridge shrink in 2011, followed by the new Haswell microarchitecture in 2012.

Intel showed off the first 32nm SRAM test chips at the IDF in 2007, and this year they showed us their first 22nm SRAM test chips. With the 22nm process, Intel will be able to produce four times the number of chips per wafer of the 45nm process, thus making CPUs even cheaper once the process reaches mature yields.

DailyTech received not one, but two briefings on the 22nm process by Mark Bohr, an Intel Senior Fellow and Director of Process Architecture and Integration. He works in Intel's Logic Technology Development group located at the D1D development fab in Hillsboro, Oregon. His primary responsibility is to direct process development for Intel's advanced logic technologies.

Intel is the first in the semiconductor industry to demonstrate working 22nm circuits. Their 22nm shuttle chip contains not only SRAM circuitry, but also logic and mixed signal transistors such as phase lock loop (PLL) circuits. It is a 364 Mbit sized array consisting of over 2.9 billion transistors and built using Intel's third generation of High-K/Metal Gate technology. Shuttle chips are used to test different types of logic during the development phase, but these chips will have the same transistor and interconnect features as on 22nm CPUs in the Ivy Bridge family.

Being able to demonstrate working 22nm SRAMs is an important milestone towards being able to build working 22nm CPUs. There are currently two types of SRAM cells that have been built so far. There is a 0.092 square micron cell designed for high performance CPUs, and a 0.108 square micron cell for for low voltage applications such as Atom SoC designs.

Fab D1D is currently producing 32nm chips in the Westmere family, but there is also a large portion dedicated to producing Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge silicon. The lessons learned will be used to develop the P1270 high performance logic process for Ivy Bridge chips, but will also lead to the development of the P1271 SoC process for 22nm Atom chips. Intel plans to speed up the introduction of P1271 so that it will be available just three months after P1270.

Intel is planning to use 193nm immersion lithography for critical layers, and double patterning for the rest. The company is unlikely to use EUV (Extreme UltraViolet) tools even for the 15nm process in 2013, but may consider them  for use in the 11nm process that will be introduced in 2015.

Intel CEO Paul Otellini has repeatedly committed to expanding the company's sales in the SoC and embedded markets as he thinks that will be the next major drivers for Intel's growth. He thinks there is a market for billions of these devices, but they must be small and cheap in order to be commercially viable. In the future, we may end up with Atom chips being produced first on the leading edge, with mobility, server, and desktop designs coming later.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Pretty fast
By eddieroolz on 9/24/2009 1:43:11 PM , Rating: 2
Intel's going ahead pretty fast. I wonder if AMD will ever have time to catch up.

If the last two years have been any indication, it seems like AMD will be playing catch-up for a long time. It's a shame.

RE: Pretty fast
By BladeVenom on 9/24/2009 2:19:50 PM , Rating: 2
AMD has always been behind in die shrinks.

RE: Pretty fast
By eddieroolz on 9/24/2009 6:12:59 PM , Rating: 2
What I was trying to say did not concern just the die shrinks. It also includes the performance of AMD processors and how it's been three years since they were neck to neck with Intel.

RE: Pretty fast
By segerstein on 9/24/2009 7:48:33 PM , Rating: 2
AMD would be beating Intel, if they had working 22nm Phenoms ;-)

There's only so much one can do with a Gen+1 manufacturing process, both in terms of performance and power (increasingly important for mobile applications).

I want to run Windows 7 on my Atom smartphone.

RE: Pretty fast
By segerstein on 9/24/2009 7:51:57 PM , Rating: 2
Absent another NetBurst fiasco, I don't see how AMD can come back at the top of the game...

RE: Pretty fast
By MrPoletski on 9/25/2009 5:18:03 AM , Rating: 1
...with a big fat cheque to their RnD department and a serious fab upgrade...

RE: Pretty fast
By StevoLincolnite on 9/24/2009 2:24:51 PM , Rating: 2
As far as Manufacturing process is concerned, AMD has always been "Behind", ever since I can remember Intel has been at the forefront of manufacturing processes.

RE: Pretty fast
By VeauX on 9/24/2009 2:30:10 PM , Rating: 2
That's the reason why they as trying to go FAB Less. Teh creation of GlobalFoundries etc..

RE: Pretty fast
By Spind on 9/25/2009 4:42:39 AM , Rating: 2
IBM is the pioneer though!

"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki