backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by Jansen.. on Sep 23 at 3:23 PM


Intel President Paul Otellini shows off a 300mm wafer containing Sandy Bridge chips
"Westmere" is only the first step, as "Sandy Bridge" will be where Intel really gets into 32nm.

The product launch of Intel's Westmere 32nm die-shrink may be just around the corner, but they aren't resting on their laurels. Sandy Bridge, Intel's next-generation architecture, is already being produced in test batches at D1D in Hillsboro, Oregon.

D1D is Intel's development fab, and is used to decrease defect densities and increase yields before the line is duplicated in the firm's worldwide manufacturing network. Intel's President Paul Otellini showed off a 300mm Sandy Bridge wafer during his opening keynote at the Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco earlier today.

Intel is currently focusing on ramping up production of Westmere-based Clarkdale and Arrandale CPUs so that there will be sufficient quantities available when they go on sale in the fourth quarter of this year. Fab D1C and AFO (Aloha Factory Operations) will also ramp up Westmere production in Q4.

Many people have questioned why Intel doesn't plan on releasing a quad-core Westmere chip, instead going with a six-core variant named Gulftown and several dual-core designs that will be paired with a 45nm graphics chip.

The answer is twofold. Intel will be capacity constrained on 32nm, with only a few fabs producing mainstream, high volume parts. Secondly, the main thrust of Intel's 32nm production will be in two major fabs which are currently undergoing expansion and retooling.

Intel's "Megafab", Fab 32 in Chandler, Arizona, will start 32nm production in late 2010, followed by Fab 11X in Rio Rancho, New Mexico. Fab 32 has a very large cleanroom at 320,000 square feet, but is eclipsed by Fab 11X's massive 370,000 sq. ft cleanroom.

Sandy Bridge will also feature a sixth generation graphics core on the same die as the processor core. It includes 256-bit AVX instructions for floating point, media, and processor intensive software.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: round vs. square
By Ammohunt on 9/23/2009 2:42:48 PM , Rating: 2
Why are Ritz crackers round and Triscuits not? it just is accept it.


"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki