backtop


Print 49 comment(s) - last by Cypherdude1.. on Sep 24 at 2:09 AM


Blockbuster is closing a fifth of its U.S. stores. The video's largest DVD rental service is gearing up for a hard stand against rapidly advancing competitors, Netflix and Redbox.  (Source: Norwood News)

Part of Blockbuster's fall has been due to the rise of Redbox, a kiosk rental service that has seized close to a sixth of the U.S. DVD rental market. The service's 18,000 kiosks offer 1-day DVD rentals at the bargain bin price of $1.  (Source: Rainy Day News)
Rental outlets are being killed by online content, vending machines, and mail rentals

Video juggernaut Blockbuster, long outmaneuvered and outsold competitors.  But the industry giant rocked the rental industry last week, when it announced that it would be closing 960 of its 5,000 U.S. stores.  Overnight Blockbuster, which also maintains 3,300 international stores, fell from a industry icon to a victim of a changing market in the minds of many.  The writing, however, has been on the wall for some time now.

Blockbuster is also changing some stores over to used DVD outlets.  In total its filing stated that as many as 1,335 to 1,560, mostly in the U.S. will close or be changed.

Blockbuster did get some good news.  Sources indicated Friday that it managed to raise more money that it had hoped for in a private debt offering.  The company, with the help of J.P. Morgan Chase, managed to secure $675M USD, when it only had expected $340M USD.  With those assets Blockbuster will be able to both pay off its $572M USD in maturing debt and carry out plans to open 2,000 rental kiosks by the end of the year, followed by a planned 7,500 more in 2010.

In the end, Blockbuster is still the market's biggest player, but it faces the danger of falling behind two leading competitors -- Redbox and Netflix -- as the market shifts.  Barry McCarthy, CFO of Netflix applauded his competitor's decision saying it was a smart move.  He stated, "Blockbuster has been battling a headwind trying to right-size their capital structure.  And it looks like they have made some important strides in making that happen. So congratulations for them."

Netflix, meanwhile continues to charge ahead.  The company is up to over 11 million subscribers and is forecasting third quarter earnings of $419M USD, up 23 percent from a year before.

Also enjoying new success is Redbox, a vending machine-style rental service that offers 1-day video rentals for $1 (customers pay $1/day for each additional day they rent it).  The company now has over 18,000 active kiosks, a 13.8 percent marketshare, and $344M USD in profit for the first two quarters of the year. 

Some studios -- Universal, Fox, and Warner Brothers -- are fighting the service, refusing to enter new-release distribution contracts with it for fear that its low prices will undercut their profits.  Redbox is suing them, and meanwhile is buying DVDs through retail channels to provide key new releases.  The company says this hiccup will do little to stop it, and that it expects sales to double by the end of the year.

Blockbuster's increased online presence can certainly combat Netflix, and its 10,000 kiosks will provide some challenge to Redbox.  But as it comes late to both of these games, the question remains whether it will be able to outcompete the younger rivals that currently dominate them.  Being king of chain video certainly brings Blockbuster much profit for the time being, but as the industry increasingly shifts towards mail rentals and vending, its ability to compete in these markets will be critical.

Other factors will play a critical impact on the future of the video distribution industry.  Executives at Google-owned YouTube are rumored to be in talks with executives from Lions Gate, Sony, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Warner Bros over a distribution scheme that would stream $3.99 DVD-quality rentals over the video sharing service.  ITunes and Amazon already offering growing rental schemes.  And free video may be the greatest threat of all, with sites like Hulu using advertising revenue to pay for a plethora of streamed TV shows and select movies.

The Blockbuster shaking up is only the latest in this fast evolving market.  Rental video stores are slowly riding into the sunset, but clinging to part of the market.  They still lead the market and won't disappear overnight, but streamed rentals, kiosks, mail rentals, and free advertising-driven content seem poised to eventually eclipse the tried-and-true format.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

$3.99 streaming??
By Alphafox78 on 9/21/2009 10:12:40 AM , Rating: 2
I dont really understand why you would pay $4 to watch one streaming movie when you can get a netflix account for $8 a month and get unlimited streaming movies. I mean they dont have new releases streaming but you can get a couple of DVDs a week which are new releases via the mail. I suppose if you HAVE to watch a new release the day it comes out or something. Ill just got to redbox for $1 and watch it if thats the case tho.

I love how the studios blame pirace for everything when its really just compition thats driving down movie prices. plus who wants to spend $10.50 to watch a movie in a theatre when you can have a better movie experience at home??




RE: $3.99 streaming??
By kattanna on 9/21/2009 10:44:24 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
who wants to spend $10.50 to watch a movie in a theatre when you can have a better movie experience at home??


thats THE issue for me right there. i have a nice 56" tv at home where i can watch and enjoy movies and shows, in my shorts drinking a beer if i so choose. if i need to use the bathroom, i can hit pause. and the biggest plus.. i dont have to put up with other people walking in front of me, kicking the back of my chair.. talking, being on their phone..etc

sure.. i have to wait a couple/few months for the movies to hit DVD so netflix can then send it to me, but honestly.. most movies are not OMG i got to see that now quality,

DISH does allow me to "rent" newly released movies for like $2.99 for 24 hours.. but why pay per movie when i can wait just a little longer and watch it via my netflix monthly package.

plus with streaming.. there is usually compression artifacts to deal with and it doesnt look as good as the DVD upscaled, yet they want me to pay MORE for that??


RE: $3.99 streaming??
By Alphafox78 on 9/21/2009 11:03:07 AM , Rating: 2
exactly. 48" LCD with HTPC and netflix via media center ftw!


RE: $3.99 streaming??
By bubbastrangelove on 9/21/2009 3:21:43 PM , Rating: 2
Yep!

Let's see, my choices are to be stuck in a movie theater with a bunch of strangers sitting in the equivalent of a comfortable lawn chair with the chatty couple on my right, miss "I can't go 2 minutes without my cell phone" in front of me and pop corn muncher to left.

or...

Lie on my couch in my boxers and a tee shirt drinking a Guinness with a private bathroom, selection of reasonably priced snacks stop/play at my leisure on a 52" screen with kick ass surround sound while playing with my wifes boobs.

hmmmm?


RE: $3.99 streaming??
By Alexstarfire on 9/21/2009 3:39:26 PM , Rating: 2
If we were all that lucky. Sounds like your place is a good place to watch movies at. Can I come over and get all the same amenities, including the wife's boobs? :D


"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki