backtop


Print 57 comment(s) - last by The0ne.. on Sep 15 at 6:58 PM


The slick Fisker Karma luxury hybrid, set to debut later this year for $87,000 gets a modest 67.2 mpg, while offering hot performance.
It may not claim as high mileage as the Chevy Volt, but the Karma sure looks nice

These days, wild claims about plug-in fuel economy are becoming commonplace.  GM is claiming that the 2011 Chevy Volt will get an incredible 230 mpg.  And Nissan, not to be outdone, is claiming that its pure-electric 2011 Nissan Leaf EV will get 367 mpg (presumably calculated using power plant efficiency, as the vehicle uses no fuel).

Fisker, meanwhile, is taking a more modest approach.  It is claiming that its slick Karma luxury plug-in hybrid gets 3.5 liters per 100 kilometers (equivalent to 67.2 mpg U.S.).  Fisker reports that the Karma also features low emissions -- a mere 83 grams per kilometer.  Fisker was careful to back these claims, stating that it adhered to the J2841 emissions testing methodology developed by the Society of Automotive Engineers.

Fisker CEO Henrik Fisker brags, "The Fisker Karma is the future of driving. It proves we can drive environmentally responsible cars without sacrificing the emotional things that made us fall in love with cars in the first place."

The Karma is anticipated to debut later this year at a price tag of approximately $87,000.  This places it in direct competition with the Tesla Roadster, but the sticker price places it in less of a direct competition with the Leaf and Chevy Volt.

The vehicle features a top speed of 125 mph and can reach 60 mph (from a stop) in 5.8 seconds.  It sports a 2.0 l Turbocharged Ecotec VVT engine, along with two electric motors for 403 total horsepower.  It has a 50 mile all-electric range.  A solar roof option is offered for both recharging the battery pack and offering climate control, similar to the Prius.  The roof panel is estimated to provide up to half a kilowatt-hour per day.

Fisker hopes to sell 15,000 of the vehicles a year.  If it can sustain this sales pace, it will save 248 million gallons of gasoline by 2016, it estimates.  Whether it can meet this objective or not, it's refreshing to see one company taking a more measured approach to fuel economy claims.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Cool
By therealnickdanger on 9/9/2009 10:28:44 AM , Rating: 3
If Tesla can come through on the 50K pricetag for the Model S, it makes this thing even less appealing.


RE: Cool
By Trippytiger on 9/9/2009 11:35:09 AM , Rating: 2
Unless you like long drives.


RE: Cool
By therealnickdanger on 9/9/2009 1:13:37 PM , Rating: 2
For those rare occassions when I travel that far, it would probably be to go camping, help someone move, or some situation where using my truck is necessary. In which case, it's a special event and I don't mind spending money on gas. Even now, it only costs me $100 in gas to go from Minneapolis to Chicago, drive around the city a little, and then come back... and that's my power-modified Dodge Magnum V-8. That includes the weight of four people and luggage.

So yeah, I probably wouldn't use the Tesla for anything other than local driving anyway.


RE: Cool
By Alexstarfire on 9/9/2009 2:53:44 PM , Rating: 2
$100 in gas to go only that far? That sucks.


"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki