Browser War: Firefox 3.6a1, Opera 10.0, IE8, Safari 4, Chrome 4 Benchmarked Part III
September 10, 2009 8:43 AM
comment(s) - last by
The conclusion of our three part series looking to expose each next gen browser's greatest strengths and weaknesses
In our exploration of next generation browsers we
the user interface, installation details, time to install, and application launch times. We next turned our attention to
CPU and memory usages
, as well as comparing and contrasting the security of the various browser offerings. Topics we haven't looked at yet include rendering comparisons, synthetic benchmarks, plug-ins, and standards support, as well as our conclusions. We planned just one more piece, but that's a lot of ground to cover, so we've broken it up into two more pieces.
In this first piece, we'll look at synthetic benchmarks and plug-in support. In the next (and final) segment, we'll examine rendering performance, standards support (including performance in the Acid3 benchmark), and our conclusions on the state of the browser war and who we believe the current winner(s) is/are.
6. Synthetic Benchmarks
The first synthetic benchmark we ran was
. The homepage for the test showed Safari 4 to be the leading web browser. Our own testing indicated that it has been passed by Google's Chrome. Safari came in second, Opera in third, Firefox in fourth, and Internet Explorer came in at a distant fifth.
The next synthetic benchmark run was the popular
. This test again showed Chrome 4 beating Safari 4. This time, though, Firefox was a runner up. Opera performed unexpectedly poorly in this test, though Opera 10 managed a bit better performance. And Internet Explorer 8 performed the worst of all, taking nearly eight times as long as Chrome 4 to complete this test. Combined with Celtic Kane, these tests indicate the Safari's Squirrelfish engine, Chrome's V8 to be the clear JS leaders and the JS performance of Trident, IE 8's engine, to be dismal.
Our next synthetic benchmark was Peacekeeper, a Futuremark test suite which we
. Our testing with the suite indicated Chrome to be in the lead, followed closely by Safari and then Firefox. Opera 10 managed middling results. Meanwhile, Internet Explorer was the slowest, managing a mere sixth of the score of Chrome. The suite looks at a number of aspects, including JS performance, CSS performance, rendering, and more, so it is a good general indicator of speed.
The last synthetic benchmark we used was How-To-Create UK's CSS test. The test loads approximately 2,500 DIVs and times how fast the load takes. Unfortunately, WebKit browsers (Safari and Chrome) aren't supported due to how they measure time, so we could only get results for Firefox, IE 8, and Opera. For these browsers, Opera 10 barely led Firefox 3.6a1, while Internet Explorer 8 yet again lagged in performance.
Conclusions to be drawn from the synthtetic tests -- Chrome is the fastest browser with Safari close behind. Opera and Firefox are just slightly behind. And Internet Explorer 8 is the slowest browser. Even on content heavy sites, though, this performance difference is not as great as these tests might seem to indicate. In fact, it may only account for a couple of extra seconds of load time. Still, it could become an annoyance on content-heavy pages like Facebook.
A common misconception is that Firefox is the only browser that has plug-ins, add-ons, extensions, or otherwise named optional components. Plug-ins/add-ons/extensions are, in fact, a vital part of modern browsers. There are a diverse variety of formats include ActiveX, NPAPI, Java, Google Gears, RSS, and Atom.
Mozilla Firefox does arguably lead in this field, having the most enthusiastic developer community for plug-ins, and the most useful plug-ins. Firefox 3.6a1 does not provide is support for classic Java plugins and ActiveX plug-ins.
Looking at the other browsers, Opera (which does not support Gears, ActiveX), Chrome (also no ActiveX), and Safari (no ActiveX, Gears partial only) all offer decent plug-in support, but their developer communities are still in a fledgling state. Internet Explorer 8, on the other hand, offers a lot of plug-ins -- in fact, plug-ins are essential to improving the browser's standards support. Unfortunately IE 8 does not support the NPAPI extension language commonly used for Mozilla. IE 8 plug-ins are generally more for utility rather than aesthetics.
Plug-ins are most accessible to Firefox users, as Firefox's plug-in system is friendly enough for even beginning users. Nonetheless, if other factors make you pick another browser, it's a good idea to check out what kind of plug-ins are available for it, as there will surely be some useful ones.
Note: All benchmarks were performed in 32-bit Vista on a Sony VAIO laptop with 3 GB of RAM, a T8100 Intel Processor (2.1 GHz), and a NVIDIA 8400 GT mobile graphics chip. The number of processes was kept consistent and at a minimum to reflect stock performance.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: If only
9/10/2009 10:48:03 AM
So you need other places to seek benchmarks? Well unfortunately while there are others they all have their own set of bias.
Tomshardware does a lot of benchmarks, but they are biased in the same slant as the author and they fudge their benchmarks now and then, or they seem to as their data doesn't always match reality.
Arstechnica is usually pretty unbiased and they do benchmarks.
techrepublic does benchmarks once in every blue moon
gizmodo does a bench mark or two.
can I stop here or have you learned to use google/bing yet to SEARCH for benchmarks?
RE: If only
9/10/2009 11:04:19 AM
OMG even with the /sarcasm you still missed the point.
I was wondering why this was not featured in Anandtech instead of as a series of articles on DT, spread out over several days. It would be better served in one comprehensive article on AT than DT.
DT = News
AT = Benchmarks/Reviews.
I did not speak to the validity or bias at all.
Some ppl need it spelled out I guess.
"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates
Browser War: Firefox 3.6a1, Opera 10.0, IE8, Safari 4, Chrome 4 Benchmarked Part II
September 8, 2009, 12:00 PM
Browser War: Firefox 3.6a1, Opera 10.0, IE8, Safari 4, Chrome 4 Benchmarked Part I
September 8, 2009, 7:59 AM
Futuremark Interview: IE8 is Slowest Browser, Macs Faster than PCs in Browser Tests
August 10, 2009, 2:05 PM
Facebook Adds Satire Tags to Its Auto-Generated "Related News" Posts
August 18, 2014, 10:43 AM
Comcast, TWC Pull Dinner Gift for FCC Commissioner... Sort Of
August 15, 2014, 1:10 PM
Comcast Accused of Wooing FCC Commissioner w/ $110K Dinner
August 13, 2014, 8:20 PM
Quick Note: Nokia’s Lumia 520 Available for $39.99 Off Contract Today Only
August 13, 2014, 10:37 AM
Wikipedia Scores $140,000 in Bitcoin Donations in One Week
August 11, 2014, 9:32 AM
China to Require Real Names for Chat Apps
August 8, 2014, 8:28 PM
Most Popular Articles
Lumia 830 Gets Major Upgrades Including New 20.1 Megapixel Toshiba Sensor
August 15, 2014, 6:00 PM
Windows Phone, BlackBerry Smartphone Market Share Falls to 2.5%, 0.5% Respectively
August 15, 2014, 9:44 AM
GM Concedes That the Cadillac ELR Doesn’t Really Compete with the Tesla Model S
August 15, 2014, 5:42 PM
Report: Windows 9 “Threshold” Tech Preview Coming Next Month
August 15, 2014, 11:29 AM
Apple Scores Patents, Preps New Reversible USB Plug for iPhone 6 Connector
August 18, 2014, 1:32 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information