backtop


Print 47 comment(s) - last by lostvyking.. on Aug 31 at 6:09 PM

SSDs are looking even more attractive to the enterprise market

The prices of Solid State Drives using Multi-Level Cell NAND flash have dropped a lot recently. This is mostly due to Intel incorporating flash memory using 34nm technology in its newest generation of X25-M SSDs. This process was first introduced late last year by IM Flash Tech, its joint venture with Micron Technologies, but IMFT was only recently able to overcome mass production problems in order to meet the quantities that Intel needed.

Although MLC flash is fine for most uses, the corporate enterprise market demands the faster speeds and higher reliability of Single-Level Cell NAND. SLC flash is capable of much faster write/erase speeds and cycle reliability than MLC flash, but costs more for the same amount of storage. This has limited its adoption to IT departments that require the highest long-term reliability and lowest down time possible, or tiered storage uses in small and medium businesses. The extremely low latency and fast access speeds have made incorporating SSDs a high priority for IT departments eager to improve performance at a low cost. SSDs are much more cost effective than traditional 15k RPM hard disk drives, especially in a tiered storage environment.

OCZ has been having a lot of success with its Vertex series of SSDs using the Barefoot flash controller. Made by Korean upstart Indilinx, the controller provides random read and write performance that surpasses most of the rest of the market. The Vertex EX series pairs the Barefoot controller with SLC flash to compete against Intel's X25-E in the enterprise market. Recently, OCZ began using MLC flash from second tier manufacturers along with the Barefoot controller to introduce slightly slower SSDs in its Agility series at a much lower price.

The company is now looking to extend the same concept to SLC SSDs. Instead of sourcing SLC NAND flash from market leader Samsung, OCZ is partnering with other firms to bring the price of enterprise level SSDs down. The current price of most 64GB SLC SSDs is $600 and up; the new Agility EX 60GB drive will be introduced at a MSRP of $399. At a price that is only two-thirds of the rest of the market, this is a drive that many Fortune 1000 firms will be sure to consider.

“Though SLC has traditionally been more expensive than MLC flash there are both performance and lifespan advantages to SLC based solid state drives.  It is for consumers that require the extended reliability of  single level cell flash that we are now introducing the Agility EX series of SSDs,” stated Eugene Chang, VP of Product Management at the OCZ technology Group.

“The Agility EX offers consumers the most cost effective SLC solid state storage solution on the market, and when customers take all the benefits of SLC into consideration the total cost of ownership of these drives truly shines through.”

The 60GB Agility EX offers speeds of up to 255MB/s read and 195MB/s write, 64MB of onboard cache, and unique performance optimized firmware to keep the drives at peak performance. It will come with OCZ's new 3-year standard warranty. Higher capacity models will be introduced by OCZ later this year.

Intel has already announced that it will extend its 34nm technology to SLC NAND flash chips at a later date. The second generation X25-E drives are expected to launch at a lower price point using Intel's proprietary flash controller. A 128GB X25-E model is also expected to be introduced alongside its 32GB and 64GB offerings. Intel is currently capacity constrained by IMFT and has had trouble meeting market demand for its new generation of SSDs. A 320GB X25-M model will be introduced once production ramps up enough.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hybrid HDD
By retrospooty on 8/27/2009 8:47:26 PM , Rating: 3
Ever heard of backups? You can get an external 1gb for $100 easy. Any hard drive, or SSD can fail at any point in time. the datat recovery cost is rediculously huge. Backup is cheap and easy.


RE: Hybrid HDD
By MatthiasF on 8/28/2009 12:31:55 AM , Rating: 1
While everyone should backup their data, how many really do? And how often do those that do?

Unless you have some sort of continuous backup setup, you're going to have periods of time where your working on new data that's not on your backup. If something goes wrong in that time frame, it's gone with SSD.

Running a continuous backup system on an SSD is an option, but you're already limited on space.

Hybrid would have the best of both worlds in the right proportion. No reason why it can't happen.


RE: Hybrid HDD
By kaoken on 8/28/2009 1:37:23 AM , Rating: 5
If your data is really that important, you'd back it up.


RE: Hybrid HDD
By Gholam on 8/28/2009 7:26:48 AM , Rating: 2
If you're running a highly loaded and critically important database, you'll have a minimum of 4 drives - one pair in RAID1 for data, the other for logs.


RE: Hybrid HDD
By rburnham on 8/28/2009 12:46:09 PM , Rating: 5
This is why I have a 1TB external hooked up to my main PC and I use my HTPC as a second backup. If all three sets of files are gone, it means my house blew up and I have bigger issues than lost porn.


"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki