backtop


Print 80 comment(s) - last by .. on Aug 30 at 7:46 PM

Low cost and integrated GPUs gain the most in Q2

GPU sales are looked at as an indicator of how well the overall computer market is doing since all computers today ship with a GPU of some sort be it of the discrete or integrated variety. So far, 2009 has been a rough year for GPU makers.

Typically, GPU makers would be disappointed with no significant growth, but with the poor economy, it's a welcome change from the significant declines other quarters have seen. Jon Peddie Research (JPR) has unveiled its latest numbers for the add-in GPU industry for Q2 2009. The numbers show that 16.81 million add-in units were shipped, up 3% from the previous quarter and down 15% from the same quarter in 2008.

Inventories had to be replenished over Q2 and JPR estimates that the replenishment at least shadowed consumption or was a bit higher. With the poor economy still hurting many consumers, sales in the GPU market moved downstream. Most of the growth in the GPU market was in the integrated segment with a 4% year-over-year increase in shipments for the quarter. Lower cost discrete cards also saw modest improvements according to JPR with higher cost discrete cards taking the worst the quarter had to offer.

The quarter was the first where AMD finally started to gain back some share from NVIDIA. JPR reports that AMD's unit share rose from 31% in Q1 to 35% in Q2 with NVIDIA seeing their share decline the same 4% to 64% overall. That means that AMD took every bit of its growth from NVIDIA's marketshare. NVIDIA and Intel GPU shipments did rebound slightly in Q1 2009.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By therealnickdanger on 8/26/2009 2:12:33 PM , Rating: 2
CUUUUUUUUUUUUDAAAAAAAA!!!!!11!!!


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By jaericho on 8/26/2009 2:24:51 PM , Rating: 2
CUDA, yes.


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By Zingam on 8/27/2009 5:12:50 AM , Rating: 2
CUDA would matter just as much as CG or whatever it was called mattered before.

OpenCL might matter because it will offer cross-vendor compatibility but CUDA - no way!


By StevoLincolnite on 8/26/2009 2:29:35 PM , Rating: 2
Cuda is Great and all, but like PhysX it hasn't really been an "Industry wide adoption" of the technology.

Why? nVidia only owns a fraction of the market, most of it is dominated by Intel as well as AMD/ATI, so developers generally choose not to support the technology in order to maximize there customers user base.


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By NicodemusMM on 8/26/2009 2:41:13 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed... CUDA could be a serious factor.
I don't know if Folding uses CUDA, but it seems that nVidia hardware performs better and has less issues when using multiple GPU's.

I've used ATI since the 9800 Pro, including 2x 4870's now. It bugs me when I see AMD flailing around in the mud with regards to GPGPU applications. I'm not into programming, so I have no idea if it's just poor implementation or nVidia's solution is really that much better.



RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By Amiga500 on 8/26/2009 3:26:21 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Agreed... CUDA could be a serious factor.


OpenCL will kill it. Stone dead.

CUDA is already becoming a dinosaur in the world of accelerated computing.

Why develop for one GPU segment (Nvidia), when you could develop for all three* (+ATi & Intel)? Makes no sense whatsoever. Watch CUDA die a slow death over the next 2 years.

*neglecting the smaller brands


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By stmok on 8/27/2009 4:02:22 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
OpenCL will kill it. Stone dead.

CUDA is already becoming a dinosaur in the world of accelerated computing.

Why develop for one GPU segment (Nvidia), when you could develop for all three* (+ATi & Intel)? Makes no sense whatsoever. Watch CUDA die a slow death over the next 2 years.

*neglecting the smaller brands


Could you be any more ignorant?

(1) CUDA is a framework that allows you directly access Nvidia GPUs; You can also call OpenCL or DirectCompute APIs with it. Seriously dude, download the CUDA SDK and you'll see they teach you how to use OpenCL with CUDA...OpenCL sits on top of CUDA and provides an alternative way to access the GPU.

(2) If you know CUDA, you have a bit of a head start when using OpenCL. Hell, you can port CUDA code to OpenCL.

(3) CUDA calls on GPUs. OpenCL calls for all sorts of processors. This could be CPU, GPU, Cell processor, DSPs, etc.


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By inighthawki on 8/27/2009 1:40:53 AM , Rating: 2
Ati has includes gpgpu support in its 'stream' technology, which of course is different from cuda, but performs the same basic tasks. I haven't really seen adoption of either technology from anyone other than ati and nvidia themselves, but it still exists. Also i thin opencl and directx11 are going to completely kill off cuda and stream in the gpgpu technology, seeing as both of them probably support a much larger user base than nvidia and ati together, let alone either or.


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By FITCamaro on 8/26/2009 2:52:59 PM , Rating: 2
If Nvidia wants CUDA to ever really be used, they're going to have to make it officially supported on ATI GPUs as well. No one is going to make a game using it which then drastically reduces performance on ATI cards.


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By monomer on 8/26/2009 4:51:03 PM , Rating: 2
I agree. Unless Nvidia somehow makes CUDA into an industry-wide standard, it will quickly be going the way of Glide.


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By just4U on 8/26/2009 11:14:22 PM , Rating: 2
Nvidia went to Ati to try and get them to adopt it. For whatever reason they didn't come on board. Maybe it had to do with not having enough say in it.. who know! Someone else might remember more about it then I do.


RE: Why Would You Buy NVidia?
By bobvodka on 8/27/2009 4:23:43 AM , Rating: 2
Probably because they had no intrest in pushing the technology of a rivial when they had their own initative which better suited their hardware (CTM as it was called originaly, back in/around 2006)


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki