backtop


Print 59 comment(s) - last by Tripmasta.. on Aug 10 at 3:44 PM


Rupert Murdoch
Murdoch plans to work with hardware and software providers to reach his goals

Print magazines and newspapers are fighting a battle today against free content that is readily available online and the need to charge for their content. Many in the newspaper industry say that quality content is not cheap and that it shouldn't be offered for free.

One of the loudest voices in the newspaper world is News Corp's Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch said Wednesday that, "We intend to charge for all our news websites. We will go down in journalism history as either the seminal moment when the industry came back from the internet abyss or this century's version of into the valley of death, rode the six hundred."

Murdoch says that the entity that is able to find a new method of recouping the cost of producing content will not only see its own profits soar, but will allow the entire industry to profit as well.

Murdoch said, "The digital revolution has opened up many new and inexpensive methods of distribution but it has NOT made content free."

The Examiner reports that Murdoch is not looking for a White House commission or changes in copyright law to rescue the ailing print publication industry. It seems that Murdoch has a decent base to build a new business model on. He points out that since his company bought the Wall Street Journal, the publication has expanded both print and online subscriptions, showing that there is still an audience that is willing to pay for content.

The WSJ is the only U.S. paper according to Murdoch that has been able to grow online and print business during the recession. Murdoch is looking to more than simply charging people to read online content as a way to boost profits. He said, "Right now we're working with software, hardware, and other publishers within the industry to develop a model that works for consumer. Beyond the economics, it is crucial we maintain a direct relationship with our customers."

Part of this plan is the introduction of an eReader that could possibly be sold along with a subscription based on contract of a specific length in a similar fashion to how mobile phones are sold. The idea of charging for content isn't a new thought for Murdoch; he has called for all newspapers to charge for content before. There are twinges of Murdoch trying to make nice with readers though, perhaps he took Google's Eric Schmidt's advice when Schmidt said don't "piss off" readers.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: The market will pay what the market will bear.
By mofo3k on 8/6/2009 10:48:57 AM , Rating: 0
The AP is NOT state run, it's a co-op of news agencies. The point of me saying that any real news comes from the AP is because any news organization will usually either have AP reports, or editorials(which they usually mask as news).

As for seeing the news for myself, eye witnesses are hardly reliable or credible either. 10 people can witness something and you may have 3 different stories of what happened.


RE: The market will pay what the market will bear.
By mdogs444 on 8/6/09, Rating: -1
RE: The market will pay what the market will bear.
By mofo3k on 8/6/2009 11:05:35 AM , Rating: 2
And you've never thought that you saw or heard something only to be wrong? Your eyes and mind can play tricks on you as well. Everyone has an imagination and you should question what you and everyone else perceives as truth.

I do normally trust myself more than anyone else, but I also realize that I'm not without any faults either. Plus, I not a god <yet>. I can't be everywhere at once. Sometimes you have to hear someone else's story and decide if it's truthful or not.


By ClownPuncher on 8/6/2009 1:58:30 PM , Rating: 4
Tricksy hobbitses


By soloman02 on 8/6/2009 11:17:36 AM , Rating: 3
While the AP is not officially state run, it effectively is. There are more pro big government articles than any other news organization. The AP refuses to run any unbiased articles on the people in this country who are protesting. When they do, they claim a handful of people showed up at the Columbus protest on August 1. There were around TEN THOUSAND people there. Hardly "a handful." Just ask Judge Andrew Napolitano, he spoke there. Or that the people who are attending the town hall meetings are "angry mobs."

The AP is so infatuated with Obama that they have ceased to be a news organization and are now just a parrot copying his talking points.


By GaryJohnson on 8/6/2009 11:48:17 AM , Rating: 3
The AP article I've seen say "thousands"...


By mofo3k on 8/6/2009 12:45:44 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah the only story I've seen about any "handfuls" is from like March and it says "handful of protests". Not sure what the OP was referencing.


By FITCamaro on 8/7/2009 6:32:47 AM , Rating: 2
It's making me sick the way the "news" is reporting on people protesting about government run health care. I forget what the topic was of the speech, but I recall people who were against it marching into a speech, holding a banner in front of the podium, and not allowing the guy who was there to speak. It was lauded as activism and the guy speaking was criticized for tearing their banner. Because he was a Republican.

When people go criticize the BS that's going on now they're reported as "mobs" and "bought off by insurance companies". Pelosi lies completely by saying they're wearing swastikas.

There's a huge rally happening in DC September 12th. I intend to go. Let's see how that's reported by the media. If they cover it at all.

There is no news anymore. It's propaganda pure and simple. I'm even losing faith in Fox.


By Tripmasta on 8/10/2009 3:13:37 PM , Rating: 3
Hahaha Fox News!?! A reliable source? It seems to me that Fox tends to run more biased, sensationalist stories than any other news organization I can find, aside from the ones who openly embrace one political stance or another. I feel low every time I read one of thier questionable articles.

Fox News - that explains so much about you FIT.

- Justin


“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki