backtop


Print 77 comment(s) - last by HrilL.. on Aug 6 at 9:51 PM

AT&T has no qualms about blaming partner Apple for app rejections

Under investigation by the Federal Communications Commission, AT&T has passed the blame for the Google Voice application rejection on to partner Apple.  According to AT&T's spokesperson, "AT&T does not manage or approve applications for the App Store. We have received the letter and will, of course, respond to it."

The FCC has demanded that Apple and AT&T explain the process by which applications are rejected.  In particular its asking what contractual conditions or non-contractual understandings with AT&T influence app store rejections. 

The government also asked, "Does AT&T have any role in the approval of iPhone applications generally (or in certain cases)? If so, under what circumstances, and what role does it play? What roles are specified in the contractual provisions between Apple and AT&T (or any non-contractual understandings) regarding the consideration of particular iPhone applications?"

The insinuation by AT&T, though, that it plays no part in app store policing and that regulation is solely the work of Apple is flat out false, though.  AT&T previously ordered Apple to force Slingbox to operate over WiFi only.  AT&T had stated:
Slingbox, which would use large amounts of wireless network capacity, could create congestion and potentially prevent other customers from using the network. The application does not run on our 3G wireless network. Applications like this, which redirect a TV signal to a personal computer, are specifically prohibited under our terms of service. We consider smartphones like the iPhone to be personal computers in that they have the same hardware and software attributes as PCs.
Steve Jobs also noted during a Q&A session that AT&T is actively policing voice-over-IP apps.  He stated that AT&T is the reason why apps like Skype are WiFi only.  In the end it appears that despite its claims of innocence, AT&T may play more of a role in iPhone app policing than it admits.

The finger pointing by AT&T does illustrate increasing tension between the two companies.  Apple took a number of apparent snipes at AT&T during its Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) keynote address, where it introduced the new iPhone 3G S.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Ruh Roh.
By monomer on 8/4/2009 12:25:14 PM , Rating: 3
Apple doesn't care about the customer BS. The only factor that determined which carrier got the iPhone was money.


RE: Ruh Roh.
By gstrickler on 8/4/2009 2:54:34 PM , Rating: 1
Actually the major factor that influenced which carrier got the iPhone was the technology, specifically GSM. In the US, that means AT&T or T-Mobile (a division of Deutsche Telekom).

GSM is the standard in most countries, which makes it the natural choice for a first product. Verizon and Sprint use CDMA, which has higher licensing costs, fewer customers, and very limited support outside the US and Asia. And if you think Apple is bad, just try dealing with Qualcomm.


RE: Ruh Roh.
By teldar on 8/4/2009 3:48:46 PM , Rating: 1
Actually, I believe that the iPhone was pitched to Verizon, but Verizon said "We need to control the software." To this, Apple said "Bite me. We'll take it to AT&T. Bitches." And so the iPhone became GSM instead of CDMA.


"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki