Print 77 comment(s) - last by HrilL.. on Aug 6 at 9:51 PM

AT&T has no qualms about blaming partner Apple for app rejections

Under investigation by the Federal Communications Commission, AT&T has passed the blame for the Google Voice application rejection on to partner Apple.  According to AT&T's spokesperson, "AT&T does not manage or approve applications for the App Store. We have received the letter and will, of course, respond to it."

The FCC has demanded that Apple and AT&T explain the process by which applications are rejected.  In particular its asking what contractual conditions or non-contractual understandings with AT&T influence app store rejections. 

The government also asked, "Does AT&T have any role in the approval of iPhone applications generally (or in certain cases)? If so, under what circumstances, and what role does it play? What roles are specified in the contractual provisions between Apple and AT&T (or any non-contractual understandings) regarding the consideration of particular iPhone applications?"

The insinuation by AT&T, though, that it plays no part in app store policing and that regulation is solely the work of Apple is flat out false, though.  AT&T previously ordered Apple to force Slingbox to operate over WiFi only.  AT&T had stated:
Slingbox, which would use large amounts of wireless network capacity, could create congestion and potentially prevent other customers from using the network. The application does not run on our 3G wireless network. Applications like this, which redirect a TV signal to a personal computer, are specifically prohibited under our terms of service. We consider smartphones like the iPhone to be personal computers in that they have the same hardware and software attributes as PCs.
Steve Jobs also noted during a Q&A session that AT&T is actively policing voice-over-IP apps.  He stated that AT&T is the reason why apps like Skype are WiFi only.  In the end it appears that despite its claims of innocence, AT&T may play more of a role in iPhone app policing than it admits.

The finger pointing by AT&T does illustrate increasing tension between the two companies.  Apple took a number of apparent snipes at AT&T during its Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) keynote address, where it introduced the new iPhone 3G S.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Apple is finally...
By phatboye on 8/4/2009 11:04:19 AM , Rating: 4
reaping the true benefits of this ridiculous exclusivity deal with at&t.

RE: Apple is finally...
By ExarKun333 on 8/4/2009 11:25:04 AM , Rating: 2
Remember that AT&T wasn't the first carrier (IIRC, third or so?) Apple shopped the iPhone to. The honeymoon in Vegas is over, and the companies are at each other's throats now...

RE: Apple is finally...
By smegz on 8/6/2009 2:37:34 PM , Rating: 2
But unfortunately, AT&T was the logical choice. CDMA has limited worldwide coverage (nearly none in Europe.) Going with Verizon would mean Apple would have to support 2 hardware sets for GSM and CDMA if they desired any European market share. Deciding to stick with GSM only gave Apple wider coverage on a single hardware set. Once 4G comes out, the point will be moot since AT&T and Verizon will be using the same tech.

"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki