Print 119 comment(s) - last by MrPoletski.. on Aug 6 at 9:14 AM

GE/Rolls-Royce F136 JSF engine in jeopardy

Purse strings in Washington are tighter than they have been in years meaning funds for some defense projects are harder to get.

The Senate has voted for an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill that could eventually block the proposed second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: the F136 from General Electric/Rolls-Royce. Aviation Week reports that Congress has earmarked unrequested funds for the F136, but the Senate adopted the amendment on July 23 that would require proof that the F136 engine would cut costs for the program overall. The program currently relies on the F135 engine from Pratt & Whitney.

The amendment was written by Sen. Joseph Lieberman from Connecticut who said, "The Department of Defense has long said that it neither wants nor intends to use an engine other than the one currently produced by Pratt & Whitney."

AviationWeek reports that Lieberman's claims are not entirely accurate. The Pentagon and Air force Leadership have been rejecting calls for the F136 alternative engine, but program leaders for the JSF have stressed that an alternative engine isn’t a bad idea. The bill will have to be amended in the House version if the F136 engine is to continue to be an option. Money for the F136 has been earmarked already in the House's defense appropriations bill.

GE spokesman Rick Kennedy said, "The funding battle over the GE Rolls-Royce F136 fighter engine for the JSF is far from over. The argument for an engine competition for the JSF, the largest fighter program in US history, is simply too compelling."

President Obama has threatened to veto a bill that comes to him promoting a second engine with a chance of disrupting the program. The Senate has already voted against more funds for the F-22 Raptor program.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Gee
By GaryJohnson on 7/27/2009 7:23:31 PM , Rating: 2
That would be fair and logical if they were requiring you or me or every other U.S. citizen to use it, but they're not.

RE: Gee
By MrBlastman on 7/27/2009 7:38:13 PM , Rating: 2
Then they shouldn't try and cram it down our throats and make us foot the bill for it. We pay their salaries, if they feel so darned righteous they should be willing to suck it up and take one for the team.

RE: Gee
By FITCamaro on 7/28/2009 6:26:14 AM , Rating: 2
You, like most of congress, apparently haven't read the bill. Should try it sometime. While not immediately, it DOES kill off private health care in 5 years. After 5 years all private plans have to match the government's. And immediately once its signed, private insurance companies can no longer accept new customers. So even if the first thing weren't true, that would slowly kill off private health care since if you change jobs or lose your job, you're on the private system and can never go back.

Read the freakin bill. Maybe then you won't be such a drone who blindly believes everything Obama tells you.

"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki