backtop


Print 119 comment(s) - last by MrPoletski.. on Aug 6 at 9:14 AM

GE/Rolls-Royce F136 JSF engine in jeopardy

Purse strings in Washington are tighter than they have been in years meaning funds for some defense projects are harder to get.

The Senate has voted for an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill that could eventually block the proposed second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: the F136 from General Electric/Rolls-Royce. Aviation Week reports that Congress has earmarked unrequested funds for the F136, but the Senate adopted the amendment on July 23 that would require proof that the F136 engine would cut costs for the program overall. The program currently relies on the F135 engine from Pratt & Whitney.

The amendment was written by Sen. Joseph Lieberman from Connecticut who said, "The Department of Defense has long said that it neither wants nor intends to use an engine other than the one currently produced by Pratt & Whitney."

AviationWeek reports that Lieberman's claims are not entirely accurate. The Pentagon and Air force Leadership have been rejecting calls for the F136 alternative engine, but program leaders for the JSF have stressed that an alternative engine isn’t a bad idea. The bill will have to be amended in the House version if the F136 engine is to continue to be an option. Money for the F136 has been earmarked already in the House's defense appropriations bill.

GE spokesman Rick Kennedy said, "The funding battle over the GE Rolls-Royce F136 fighter engine for the JSF is far from over. The argument for an engine competition for the JSF, the largest fighter program in US history, is simply too compelling."

President Obama has threatened to veto a bill that comes to him promoting a second engine with a chance of disrupting the program. The Senate has already voted against more funds for the F-22 Raptor program.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What's that sound I hear?
By ImEmmittSmith on 7/27/2009 4:28:41 PM , Rating: 1
+1 if I could! Right on the money. America has always been willing to die for other countries just so they can be or remain free of tyranny or oppression. America does more good than the media gives us credit for. Just talk to any soldier that has come back from IRAQ who has been around civilians. The people really like what we are doing and have done for them, but the power mongers want us out!


RE: What's that sound I hear?
By MrPoletski on 8/6/2009 8:54:40 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
America has always been willing to die for other countries just so they can be or remain free of tyranny or oppression.


Just like in 1953 when Britain and the USA organised a military coup to overthrow the democraticly elected Iranian government in favour of military style dictatorship responsible for numerous atrocious human rights violations?

Your claim is laughable given even a small amount of historical reading. I feel sorry for the troops being used as pawns in a big game of chess.

You think the USA acts benevolent like you say because you believe the rubbish the politicians cite as the reasoning for their military intervention.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki