Print 119 comment(s) - last by MrPoletski.. on Aug 6 at 9:14 AM

GE/Rolls-Royce F136 JSF engine in jeopardy

Purse strings in Washington are tighter than they have been in years meaning funds for some defense projects are harder to get.

The Senate has voted for an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill that could eventually block the proposed second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: the F136 from General Electric/Rolls-Royce. Aviation Week reports that Congress has earmarked unrequested funds for the F136, but the Senate adopted the amendment on July 23 that would require proof that the F136 engine would cut costs for the program overall. The program currently relies on the F135 engine from Pratt & Whitney.

The amendment was written by Sen. Joseph Lieberman from Connecticut who said, "The Department of Defense has long said that it neither wants nor intends to use an engine other than the one currently produced by Pratt & Whitney."

AviationWeek reports that Lieberman's claims are not entirely accurate. The Pentagon and Air force Leadership have been rejecting calls for the F136 alternative engine, but program leaders for the JSF have stressed that an alternative engine isn’t a bad idea. The bill will have to be amended in the House version if the F136 engine is to continue to be an option. Money for the F136 has been earmarked already in the House's defense appropriations bill.

GE spokesman Rick Kennedy said, "The funding battle over the GE Rolls-Royce F136 fighter engine for the JSF is far from over. The argument for an engine competition for the JSF, the largest fighter program in US history, is simply too compelling."

President Obama has threatened to veto a bill that comes to him promoting a second engine with a chance of disrupting the program. The Senate has already voted against more funds for the F-22 Raptor program.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What's that sound I hear?
By FITCamaro on 7/27/2009 11:54:26 AM , Rating: 4
This doesn't really hurt our air superiority. What it does is potentially stifle international interest in the plane. The idea behind developing the 2nd engine is that some international customers for the jet might want a European designed engine in the plane. The two engines are completely swappable without any modification needed. It doesn't increase or decrease the performance of the plane.

The international cooperation and interest in the plane is what is supposed to make it cheaper. That could be partly in jeopardy now.

RE: What's that sound I hear?
By TSS on 7/27/2009 9:58:12 PM , Rating: 2
i hardly think so. our dutch kabinet has been pouring money into this thing as well while everybody knew from the start it would seriously go overbudget. they've been using the "in for a penny in for a pound" excuse for quite a time so i don't expect this time to be any different. nor for any of the other countries that signed on.

you guys best finish this thing before 2012 though. we have our next elections then, things are looking to be shaken up quite a bit. so i wouldn't count on those funds much longer.

RE: What's that sound I hear?
By FITCamaro on 7/28/2009 6:21:13 AM , Rating: 1
Well if the current trend in Europe continues, more conservatives will get elected.

"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki