Purse strings in Washington are tighter than they have been in years meaning funds for some defense projects are harder to get.
The Senate has voted for an amendment to the annual defense authorization bill that could eventually block the proposed second engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: the F136 from General Electric/Rolls-Royce. Aviation Week reports that Congress has earmarked unrequested funds for the F136, but the Senate adopted the amendment on July 23 that would require proof that the F136 engine would cut costs for the program overall. The program currently relies on the F135 engine from Pratt & Whitney.
The amendment was written by Sen. Joseph Lieberman from Connecticut who said, "The Department of Defense has long said that it neither wants nor intends to use an engine other than the one currently produced by Pratt & Whitney."
AviationWeek reports that Lieberman's claims are not entirely accurate. The Pentagon and Air force Leadership have been rejecting calls for the F136 alternative engine, but program leaders for the JSF have stressed that an alternative engine isn’t a bad idea. The bill will have to be amended in the House version if the F136 engine is to continue to be an option. Money for the F136 has been earmarked already in the House's defense appropriations bill.
GE spokesman Rick Kennedy said, "The funding battle over the GE Rolls-Royce F136 fighter engine for the JSF is far from over. The argument for an engine competition for the JSF, the largest fighter program in US history, is simply too compelling."
President Obama has threatened to veto a bill that comes to him promoting a second engine with a chance of disrupting the program. The Senate has already voted against more funds for the F-22 Raptor program.
quote: well what are not telling you is these companies are very very greedy.
quote: They keep uping the price to build these machines all the time. This is one way of letting them know that the gov. is tired of getting ripped off. they can build as many jets and engines as the country allows with the current money they have.
quote: America has always been willing to die for other countries just so they can be or remain free of tyranny or oppression.
quote: The Military is a thankless job. :-| I'll just use this posting space to say: "Thank you!" to all our brave men and women. I thanked a guy in the airport the other day coming home from Iraq. They need to hear it.
quote: What I find hilarious is that for all of this spending and protection that we provide, we hardly are ever appreciated for it.
quote: Maybe it's about time we let those countries' taxpayers foot the full bill for their defense?
quote: When you are protecting Britan, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Poland, Japan, South Korea, Saudi Arabi, and Kuwait, it's really not that hard to spend a lot of money on defense.
quote: The really sad thing is that the all of Europe spends less then half of what we spend of what we do, so they can lean on us whenever they need to.
quote: The US government's military spending is about 50% of the world's military spending.
quote: USA on the other hand have a military that could defend half the globe. Not really needed and it makes USA look more like an aggressor.
quote: Fx. it is pretty clear the US needs the Middle East for it's oil and with a desire to also be friends with Israel that requires a big stick to pull off.
quote: I do not think it is the US allies as much as it is the US itself!
quote: Maintaining a military is one of the few things our government does that it is actually constitutionally obligated to do
quote: The original contract for the F-22 was somewhere around 400 (enough to replace the F-15). Now they're stopping production at 162. So you can see how the price keeps going up. Northrop Grumman didn't spend less on R&D because the production run was less than expected. That cost is static and already spent. The F-22 was especially frustrating, because congress reduced the production run multiple times. Each time they used the excuse that the plane cost too much. And each time they cut the numbers the cost per unit went up. Imagine that!
quote: Investing hundreds of billions in cutting edge aircraft is a complete waste at this point considering the kind of wars that are being fought.
quote: If the choice is between overkill and underkill, I'll take overkill.
quote: You guys are missing his point. Of course the airforce is crucial to recent wars like Iraq and Afghanistan. But we could have used WW2 planes for that and it wouldn't make a difference. These countries are not even challenging our airforce, effectively reducing the role of our planes to transports for our bombs. The guidance technology in the bombs themselves is much more important then the planes.
quote: AviationWeek reports that Lieberman's claims are not entirely accurate. The Pentagon and Air force Leadership have been rejecting calls for the F136 alternative engine, but program leaders for the JSF have stressed that an alternative engine isn’t a bad idea.
quote: We are defenseless? When did that happen?