Print 91 comment(s) - last by zzdinko.. on Aug 1 at 9:34 AM

Apple says its iPhone 3G S is "ready for business", however one leading hacker calls it "useless" for business users, thanks to its woefully poor encryption and security. He says the phones pose a serious threat to companies adopting them. Still, some companies say it's worth the risk.  (Source: The iPhone Blog)
The iPhone yet again experiencing criticism over poor security

Jonathan Zdziarski, an iPhone developer and a hacker who teaches forensics courses on recovering data from iPhones, hasn't been very impressed with the iPhone's security -- or lack thereof.  Mr. Zdziarski has indicated that iPhone OS v3.0 is a bit better when it comes to security, but he says with only a few pieces of readily available freeware you can easily crack it in under two minutes.  That news must be concerning for the corporations and government agencies that support the hundreds of thousands of business iPhones Apple says it has sold.

Mr. Zdziarski says the iPhone's security woes are entirely unnecessary and are the result of incompetence.  He states, "It is kind of like storing all your secret messages right next to the secret decoder ring.  I don’t think any of us [developers] have ever seen encryption implemented so poorly before, which is why it’s hard to describe why it’s such a big threat to security."

His statements stand in stark contrast with Apple Chief Operating Officer Tim Cook's cheerful news that 20 percent of Fortune 100 companies have purchased 10,000 or more iPhones apiece and that multiple government organizations had purchased 25,000 iPhones apiece.  Mr. Cook had bragged, "We’re seeing growing interest with the release of iPhone 3.0 and the iPhone 3GS due in part to the new hardware encryption and improved security policies.  The phone is particularly doing well with small businesses and large organizations."

Mr. Zdziarski says these entities might be in trouble as the encryption on the phone is so poorly implemented a simple software tool makes it as easy to view encrypted files as unencrypted ones.  Thieves could extract live encrypted data from the phone in a mere 2 minutes, and have an entire raw disk image in about 45 minutes.  Interestingly, the iPhone itself helps with these tasks – it begins to decrypt data on its own automatically after the extraction process has started.

Corporate users often edit finance spreadsheets and other corporate documents on their phone, as well as using the phone to make transactions with corporate credit cards.  All of this information is easy pickings for hackers thanks to the phone's woeful security.  Mr. Zdziarski surmises, "If (companies are) relying on Apple’s security, then their application is going to be terribly insecure.  Apple may be technically correct that [the iPhone 3GS] has an encryption piece in it, but it’s entirely useless toward security.  We’re going to have to go with the old imperative of ‘Trust no one'.  And unfortunately part of that is, don’t trust Apple."

Still, some companies say that the risks of deployments are worth it.  States Lance Kidd, chief information officer of Halton Company, an industrial equipment provider, which lets its employees use iPhones, "Your organization has to be culturally ready to accept a certain degree of risk.  I can say we’ve secured everything as tight as a button, but that won’t be true…. Our culture is such that our general manager is saying, ‘I’m willing to take the risk for the value of the applications.’  It’s like business continuity.  You prepare for disasters. You prepare for if there’s an earthquake and the building breaks down, and you prepare for if there’s a crack in [information] security."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Gone...
By callmeroy on 7/27/2009 8:39:57 AM , Rating: 2
As later posts in the thread point out I think firing him on that alone is a bit over the top, especially considering it appears its the GM, not the CIO who really has the decision making authority in that particular organization.

Plus I can sympathize with that CIO -- I worked, for nearly 10 years, in IT for a small 150 user business where even though I was for several years the only trained IT employee in the business or knew anything about security at all - I was over-ruled many times by the CEO, the VP or the Finance guy. It my situation it was almost always over the issue of spending vs. not spending. One case was I was over - ruled on the fact the company was using MS Office, of which they were sharing about 30 copies of it and only had 1 license. Company felt it was "silly" to pay money for software they "already bought". They got dinged on that, a disgruntled employee reported them to the BSA - they paid a tens of thousands in fines.

Sometimes you just have no say in what your company does even if you are the subject matter expert on the staff. Its either that or you are in the unemployment line.

RE: Gone...
By MrPoletski on 7/27/2009 10:51:49 AM , Rating: 1
a) would you want to work for a company like that?
b) will a company with an attitude like that survive in the long term?
c) what the hell is wrong with openoffice anwyays?

no, no, nothing.

RE: Gone...
By callmeroy on 7/27/2009 12:53:02 PM , Rating: 2
Like most things people write or say -- talking about something is one thing, reality is another.

a) I *did* work for a company like that through most of my 20's actually. Money is money -- when the job market is tough and you have bills to pay its amazing what we'll put up with.

b) I agree with you -- but they did very well while I was there, don't know how they are doing today -- its been 5 years since I left there. I do know they were scamming some of thier customers by marking up services exponentially so I hope that catches up with them. (ie. a job would cost $2500 bucks , to some clients that job would be billed at $3500 - 4500 bucks, other clients same scope and service -- they'd charge $10,000 - $12,000 for that same $2500 job).

c) Well I'm not gonna delve into that -- I use open office at home because I'm dabbling in some fictional novel writing here and there, however for the work place I think valid arguments could be made that Office is better for a business environment. To be honest I'd BUY office rather than use OpenOffice if MS didn't price it so insanely high.

"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson

Latest Headlines

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki