Print 59 comment(s) - last by SiliconDoc.. on Aug 14 at 11:09 AM

A new FDA study finds that e-cigarettes contain many carcinogens and toxins, like their smoking counterparts. Manufacturers' claims that they make for "healthy" use appear blatantly incorrect.  (Source: Sean O'Key/
Proof yet again that things that sound to good to be true really are

They are billed as affordable and safe ways to enjoy the experience of smoking without the health risks.  Every day thousands of customers across the country "light up" e-cigarettes, a new product that is taking the online world by storm.  E-cigarettes consist of cartridges filled with nicotine and other chemicals, spiced with flavors such as chocolate, cola or bubble gum.  The "cigarette" typically lights up as it vaporizes the nicotine-chemical cocktail, which it delivers as steam to the user.

As sales for the devices, market as a healthy-living product, have skyrocketed, the Food and Drug Administration became concerned.  Exactly how "healthy" were these cigarette substitutes? 

The FDA began testing them and it quickly discovered that the e-cigarettes, like their smoking counterparts, are hazardous to the health.  The samples from various manufacturers contained dangerous carcinogens.  Further, at least one manufacturer's mix contained diethylene glycol -- a chemical used in antifreeze, and a toxin to humans.

Dr. Jonathan Samet, director of the Institute for Global Health at the University of Southern California comments, "We know very little about these devices, but to say they are healthy -- that's highly doubtful."

Dr. Margaret A. Hamburg, commissioner of the FDA adds, "The FDA is concerned about the safety of these products and how they are marketed to the public."

One of the largest manufacturers of the devices, Florida-based Smoking Everywhere has remained mum on the reports.  The devices do appear, thus-far to be legal as a combination drug-device product under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Dr. Jonathan Winickoff, chairman of the American Academy of Pediatrics Tobacco Consortium urges people to think of the children, commenting, "It is very important that parents let their children know these are not safe and to make recommendations, or even enforce rules that they not be used."

Dr. Matthew McKenna, director of the Office of Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention adds, "Children who use these products may also be using other tobacco products.  It's a good idea to make sure the child is aware of the dangers of tobacco in products in general."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: wasnt it obvious?
By SiliconDoc on 8/14/2009 9:23:56 AM , Rating: 2
Murst, then we should also ban public healthcvare dollars for all the x-sporters, they engage in highly dangerous activities, and if they break an ankle, it was their choice.
Then we can include anyone who didn't have their seatbelt clicked and got in an accident.
Drunken drivers, too.
Skiers - that's very dangerous.
Anyone who sucks down a twinkie or meals over the FDA 4-4-3-2 prescribed balanced dietary meals chart.
Soda drinkers and candy bar lovers.
Health nuts like Arnold the governator, whose heart blew from the massive iron pumping.
Marathon runners who get shin splints, ankle and foot trouble, and have heart explosions too from the giant throbbing over-pump they developed in their chests.
On and on and on....
I'm certain the liberal lefty freaks will develope and enforce a quite arbitrary and unfair politcally correct list of OK dangers and NOT OK dangers, and then force society into compliance through manipulation of their nazi-like Dr. Mengala "choose the worthy" and murder the unworthy "national healthcare plan" that "doesn't cost anyone a dime and in fact saves money"....
I say the first ones we line up for the dollar saving deth knell are the kookballs who support the tyrrany to begin with. Let's see just how dedicated they are.

"Paying an extra $500 for a computer in this environment -- same piece of hardware -- paying $500 more to get a logo on it? I think that's a more challenging proposition for the average person than it used to be." -- Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki