Print 112 comment(s) - last by Cr0nJ0b.. on Jul 28 at 6:24 PM

The National Highway Safety Administration has suggested that state and local governments ban all cell phone activities from the road, including the use of hands-free headsets.  (Source:
Hands free devices also too risky, administration says

California made headlines when it began enforcing legislation that enacted pricey fines for those caught talking without hands free headsets or texting on their cell phone while driving.  The provision and similar ones across the country seem reasonable, considering that some studies found cell phones to impair driving more than even commonly abused drugs like alcohol or marijuana.  Many drivers in California did the seemingly logical thing -- switch to hand-free headsets.  However, some research indicated that even conversations on hands-free headsets can still be distracting and dangerous.

Now an unprecedented suggestion by the U.S. Highway Safety Administration has been revealed -- ban all cell phones on U.S. streets.  The suggestion was actually first made in 2002, but has only now been revealed, thanks to The Center for Auto Safety and Public Citizen, which filed a lawsuit to obtain documents from the agency under the Freedom of Information Act.

The NHTSA draft on cell phone policy states, “We recommend that drivers not use these devices when driving, except in an emergency.  Moreover, we are convinced that legislation forbidding the use of handheld cell phones while driving may not be effective in improving highway safety since it will not address the problem. In fact, such legislation may erroneously imply that hands-free phones are safe to use while driving."

The agency's request was reportedly shared with state traffic departments and select lawmakers, but was kept from even the majority of national lawmakers.  The agency feared that both members of Congress and the public would be upset at the report.

At the time when the report was made, there were 170 million cell phone subscribers in America, "more than half of the U.S. population".  There are now 270 million subscribers -- 87 percent of the population -- according to CTIA-The Wireless Association, the cell phone industry trade group.  According to the NHTSA report, "Driver distraction contributes to about 25 percent of all police-reported traffic crashes. Though all distractions are a concern, we have seen the growth of a particular distraction, namely cell phone use while driving. While the precise impact cannot be quantified, we nevertheless have concluded that the use of cell phones while driving has contributed to an increasing number of crashes, injuries and fatalities."

The agency comments that in the research it has reviewed, hands free headsets were shown to provide "little, if any, difference between the use of hand-held and hands-free phones in contributing to the risk of a crash while driving distracted. Hands-free or hand-held, we have found that the cognitive distraction is significant enough to degrade a driver's performance."

The agency says that legislation against using cell phones while driving is a decision for states and local governments to make.  It urges them to consider bans and points out that "at least 42 countries restrict or prohibit use of cell phones and other wireless technology in motor vehicles, and several more are considering legislation."

Even if cell phones are not outright banned, many places across the country increase traffic fines if a violation is committed while the offender is on their cell phone.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: As bad as DUI
By FangedRabbit on 7/24/2009 1:13:49 PM , Rating: 2

I call BS. The problem is that cell phone use is often cited in an accident but isn't nescessarily the cause. They just tack it onto the data saying that a cell phone was involved.

I've personally had 2 such instances; once while sitting at a red light in heavy traffic and somone rear ended me. I had been sitting there for some time and while I was on my phone, it was in now way involved in the incident. I was rear ended another time because the other driver was trying to pick his phone up off the floor of his car and wasn't watching the road. It could have been anything he was trying to pick up, but they try to cite cell phone involvement when they throw around statistics. If they started tracking and citing all sources of distraction causing accidents, I'm sure they would find that cell phones only account for a small fraction of incidences.

The reality is that taking your attention off the road for any reason is the danger. Kids, passengers, billboards, radios, GPS, the hot chick in the car next to you...they all cause you to take your attention off the road. It isn't feasible to try to remove the distractions, instead they should focus on distraction management.

What about smart phones? Someone might not be talking on their phone, they could be reading an email or fiddling with the music player. I've seen people reading books while driving so WTF. The cellphone is just a scapegoat because someone in NHTSA got cut off by a teenage girl with a phone glued to her ear.

As for hands free devices, they make things even worse! How long do you have to take your attention off the road to find and use a hands free device VS just answering the call?

NHTSA needs to pull their heads out of their asses and grow up. This is stupid.


"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki